Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: The FBI strategized about getting him to commit a crime so that they could prosecute him. Fact: They couched the interview so that it would like it was just an informal meeting. Fact: They told him he didn't need counsel.

That, in itself, should be enough for this case to be thrown out.

Fact, you are taking someone else's interpretation of the notes. The person who wrote the notes has commented on them and has said their words were being mischaracterized.

Yeah right. The strategy that was written in those notes, was indeed carried out as planned. What else could those notes have meant?

The FBI never got an explanation for Flynn's lies about the phone calls. Neither he nor KT MacFarlane remember. And the transcript for the calls haven't been released, although one person who saw them said they were very bad.

The FBI's strategy of asking Flynn about the calls wasn't successful, since he lied to them and has never told anyone the truth about them.

This statement makes no sense. The FBI strategy about the interview was carried out to a tee. They did exactly as they planned, and got the result that they wanted. They ALREADY KNEW what was in the phone calls, before the meeting.

[Anonymous]

Why haven't we heard from the FBI agent who took the notes?
I wouldn't trust anything that Strozk did. And, it was illegal for Page to be touching the 302.

Please answer those questions.

[Anonymous]

As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn didn't know not to lie to the FBI.

He's not as smart as he thinks he is, is he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn didn't know not to lie to the FBI.

He's not as smart as he thinks he is, is he?

Wrong again. Forgetting the date and time happens to the best of us, including Obama saying his Muslim faith.

Flynn gave up and admitted to forgetting (lying) about a date and time had everything to do with protecting his son from the wrath of Andrew Weissman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn didn't know not to lie to the FBI.

He's not as smart as he thinks he is, is he?

Wrong again. Forgetting the date and time happens to the best of us, including Obama saying his Muslim faith.

Flynn gave up and admitted to forgetting (lying) about a date and time had everything to do with protecting his son from the wrath of Andrew Weissman.

Oh please. He didn't forget the subject of those conversations. He chose to lie about them.

His omissions weren't "date and time", which anyone could misstated or forget. He lied about the entirety of the phone calls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: The FBI strategized about getting him to commit a crime so that they could prosecute him. Fact: They couched the interview so that it would like it was just an informal meeting. Fact: They told him he didn't need counsel.

That, in itself, should be enough for this case to be thrown out.

Fact, you are taking someone else's interpretation of the notes. The person who wrote the notes has commented on them and has said their words were being mischaracterized.

Yeah right. The strategy that was written in those notes, was indeed carried out as planned. What else could those notes have meant?

The FBI never got an explanation for Flynn's lies about the phone calls. Neither he nor KT MacFarlane remember. And the transcript for the calls haven't been released, although one person who saw them said they were very bad.

The FBI's strategy of asking Flynn about the calls wasn't successful, since he lied to them and has never told anyone the truth about them.

This statement makes no sense. The FBI strategy about the interview was carried out to a tee. They did exactly as they planned, and got the result that they wanted. They ALREADY KNEW what was in the phone calls, before the meeting.

Then, why did they need to ask him about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: The FBI strategized about getting him to commit a crime so that they could prosecute him. Fact: They couched the interview so that it would like it was just an informal meeting. Fact: They told him he didn't need counsel.

That, in itself, should be enough for this case to be thrown out.

Fact, you are taking someone else's interpretation of the notes. The person who wrote the notes has commented on them and has said their words were being mischaracterized.

Yeah right. The strategy that was written in those notes, was indeed carried out as planned. What else could those notes have meant?

The FBI never got an explanation for Flynn's lies about the phone calls. Neither he nor KT MacFarlane remember. And the transcript for the calls haven't been released, although one person who saw them said they were very bad.

The FBI's strategy of asking Flynn about the calls wasn't successful, since he lied to them and has never told anyone the truth about them.

This statement makes no sense. The FBI strategy about the interview was carried out to a tee. They did exactly as they planned, and got the result that they wanted. They ALREADY KNEW what was in the phone calls, before the meeting.

Then, why did they need to ask him about it?

They didn't. That is the whole point. The "need to ask him about it" was a pretext for having the meeting, so they could get him to lie. If they just wanted to "ask him about it", they could have shown him the transcript and ask him to explain.

[Anonymous]

"Determined he [Flynn] wasn't being straight with the Vice President and others."

Is Reince Preibus lying in this interview from February 2017?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMWE2Hlb9ZU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: The FBI strategized about getting him to commit a crime so that they could prosecute him. Fact: They couched the interview so that it would like it was just an informal meeting. Fact: They told him he didn't need counsel.

That, in itself, should be enough for this case to be thrown out.

Fact, you are taking someone else's interpretation of the notes. The person who wrote the notes has commented on them and has said their words were being mischaracterized.

Yeah right. The strategy that was written in those notes, was indeed carried out as planned. What else could those notes have meant?

The FBI never got an explanation for Flynn's lies about the phone calls. Neither he nor KT MacFarlane remember. And the transcript for the calls haven't been released, although one person who saw them said they were very bad.

The FBI's strategy of asking Flynn about the calls wasn't successful, since he lied to them and has never told anyone the truth about them.

This statement makes no sense. The FBI strategy about the interview was carried out to a tee. They did exactly as they planned, and got the result that they wanted. They ALREADY KNEW what was in the phone calls, before the meeting.

Then, why did they need to ask him about it?

They didn't. That is the whole point. The "need to ask him about it" was a pretext for having the meeting, so they could get him to lie. If they just wanted to "ask him about it", they could have shown him the transcript and ask him to explain.

BINGO!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Determined he [Flynn] wasn't being straight with the Vice President and others."

Is Reince Preibus lying in this interview from February 2017?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMWE2Hlb9ZU

I am waiting to hear what comes out in terms of what he said to the FBI and to the VP before I form an opinion on whether he lied to anybody.
At this point, I am not trusting the FBI to be truthful to the defense, the court, or the administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

Look at the GOP carrying Russia’s water for them again, just like the woman you’re smearing said you would!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/17/russia-is-interfering-our-elections-again-trump-supporters-are-emulating-russian-tactics/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: The FBI strategized about getting him to commit a crime so that they could prosecute him. Fact: They couched the interview so that it would like it was just an informal meeting. Fact: They told him he didn't need counsel.

That, in itself, should be enough for this case to be thrown out.

Fact, you are taking someone else's interpretation of the notes. The person who wrote the notes has commented on them and has said their words were being mischaracterized.

Yeah right. The strategy that was written in those notes, was indeed carried out as planned. What else could those notes have meant?

The FBI never got an explanation for Flynn's lies about the phone calls. Neither he nor KT MacFarlane remember. And the transcript for the calls haven't been released, although one person who saw them said they were very bad.

The FBI's strategy of asking Flynn about the calls wasn't successful, since he lied to them and has never told anyone the truth about them.

This statement makes no sense. The FBI strategy about the interview was carried out to a tee. They did exactly as they planned, and got the result that they wanted. They ALREADY KNEW what was in the phone calls, before the meeting.

Then, why did they need to ask him about it?

They didn't. That is the whole point. The "need to ask him about it" was a pretext for having the meeting, so they could get him to lie. If they just wanted to "ask him about it", they could have shown him the transcript and ask him to explain.

They knew what the phone calls were about. They wanted his explanation for why Pence and Spicer had it wrong.

He didn't give them any explanation, only lies.