Plan B if Elrich wins tomorrow...

[Anonymous]

If he wins, we need to go for plan B and that means drafting someone to either run an independent campaign or, run as a Republican against him in the general.

[Anonymous]

Hans Riemer has backing from major money groups, so please encourage him to keep running.

[Anonymous]

It was tried (Floreen) in the last election. Too many peopel blindly vote for the "(D)" person without even reading the name.

Even a super-moderate Republicn doesn't stand a chance.

The best long-term solution is open primaries. Youd' then end up with 2 D's in the general and at least one would be relatively normal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was tried (Floreen) in the last election. Too many peopel blindly vote for the "(D)" person without even reading the name.

Even a super-moderate Republicn doesn't stand a chance.

The best long-term solution is open primaries. Youd' then end up with 2 D's in the general and at least one would be relatively normal.

Floreen was late to the ballot and didn’t have the funding and organization that Riemer does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was tried (Floreen) in the last election. Too many peopel blindly vote for the "(D)" person without even reading the name.

Even a super-moderate Republicn doesn't stand a chance.

The best long-term solution is open primaries. Youd' then end up with 2 D's in the general and at least one would be relatively normal.

Floreen was late to the ballot and didn’t have the funding and organization that Riemer does.

Floreen's PAC was funded better than Elrich's PAC as I recall. She was late to the race, but her numbers were pretty low regardless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was tried (Floreen) in the last election. Too many peopel blindly vote for the "(D)" person without even reading the name.

Even a super-moderate Republicn doesn't stand a chance.

The best long-term solution is open primaries. Youd' then end up with 2 D's in the general and at least one would be relatively normal.

Floreen was late to the ballot and didn’t have the funding and organization that Riemer does.

Floreen's PAC was funded better than Elrich's PAC as I recall. She was late to the race, but her numbers were pretty low regardless.

Riemer is a different candidate with a different brand. He inspires a lot of people and has developed a following. He has the opportunity to really do this. The question is whether he’s committed enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he wins, we need to go for plan B and that means drafting someone to either run an independent campaign or, run as a Republican against him in the general.

Isn't Robin Ficker running on the republican primary tomorrow like he does every 4 years?

[Anonymous]

But I like Elrich...

[Anonymous]

Any R or I here MUST vote for the Independent candidate. Don't vote for a R. Your vote is a throw away here, and we will end up with Elrich again.

If you want a moderate and not Elrich, then hold your nose and vote for the moderate D who hopefully will run as an Independent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he wins, we need to go for plan B and that means drafting someone to either run an independent campaign or, run as a Republican against him in the general.

Isn't Robin Ficker running on the republican primary tomorrow like he does every 4 years?

Yes but this time it’s the Republican primary for Governor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was tried (Floreen) in the last election. Too many peopel blindly vote for the "(D)" person without even reading the name.

Even a super-moderate Republicn doesn't stand a chance.

The best long-term solution is open primaries. Youd' then end up with 2 D's in the general and at least one would be relatively normal.

Floreen was late to the ballot and didn’t have the funding and organization that Riemer does.

Floreen's PAC was funded better than Elrich's PAC as I recall. She was late to the race, but her numbers were pretty low regardless.

Riemer is a different candidate with a different brand. He inspires a lot of people and has developed a following. He has the opportunity to really do this. The question is whether he’s committed enough.

I already have very little respect for Riemer. I’d have even less if he did this. His negativity and misguided views certainly aren’t inspiring.

[Anonymous]

Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was tried (Floreen) in the last election. Too many peopel blindly vote for the "(D)" person without even reading the name.

Even a super-moderate Republicn doesn't stand a chance.

The best long-term solution is open primaries. Youd' then end up with 2 D's in the general and at least one would be relatively normal.

Floreen was late to the ballot and didn’t have the funding and organization that Riemer does.

Floreen's PAC was funded better than Elrich's PAC as I recall. She was late to the race, but her numbers were pretty low regardless.

Riemer is a different candidate with a different brand. He inspires a lot of people and has developed a following. He has the opportunity to really do this. The question is whether he’s committed enough.

I already have very little respect for Riemer. I’d have even less if he did this. His negativity and misguided views certainly aren’t inspiring.

There are a lot of people in this county that like and support Riemer and I hope he’s drafted to run in the general. He will be a formidable candidate and will likely win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was tried (Floreen) in the last election. Too many peopel blindly vote for the "(D)" person without even reading the name.

Even a super-moderate Republicn doesn't stand a chance.

The best long-term solution is open primaries. Youd' then end up with 2 D's in the general and at least one would be relatively normal.

Floreen was late to the ballot and didn’t have the funding and organization that Riemer does.

Floreen's PAC was funded better than Elrich's PAC as I recall. She was late to the race, but her numbers were pretty low regardless.

Riemer is a different candidate with a different brand. He inspires a lot of people and has developed a following. He has the opportunity to really do this. The question is whether he’s committed enough.

I already have very little respect for Riemer. I’d have even less if he did this. His negativity and misguided views certainly aren’t inspiring.

There are a lot of people in this county that like and support Riemer and I hope he’s drafted to run in the general. He will be a formidable candidate and will likely win.

You are underestimating the many people he has alienated. There is a sentiment that he only listens to people in his closed bubble of shared beliefs / experiences. I suspect you must be in that bubble. I’m not in it and I see him as hostile and duplicitous.

[Anonymous]

Much prefer Elrich to Blair. Really I prefer Reimer, but will vote for Elrich tomorrow