US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics - The Commision Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We still don't have explanations of how certain offices, that are virtually hidden, were exploited, and why the "panic buttons" of certain other offices, were disabled.

And how the mob knew which dozen windows out of hundreds had not been fortified.

I also haven’t heard of any charging documents that specify which criminals defiled the Capitol with feces. I want them named and shamed for that.

[Anonymous]

Burning documents in the fireplace at the White House seems obstructiony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Fascinating.

Here I am, walking and chewing gum at the same time, and this drops out of the sky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

1. Loudermilk says he had about a dozen people in his office the day before Jan 6. He said they were peaceful protesters who had already gathered at the Mall by the Capitol. He doesn’t say he gave a tour. I think I remember they were not allowing the public in?

You are correct. There were zero people allowed at the Capitol at the time who didn’t work there due to Covid.

Also didn’t he lie in the aftermath of the coup and deny any visitors? Now he admits a dozen Trump rally goers were there. But a couple of days ago it was a constituent family? I would think any of those people would be on security cameras and signed in. The thing about lying is the story constantly changes.

He already knew there were going to be consequences for MAGA crazies by the time he gave this interview. He made sure to mention that his visitors fled back to the mall when they realized what others were doing. How close are these visitors to him that they remained in contact after their visit? He said he met them at church. They sound like they have a deeper relationship than than just Representative/constituents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We still don't have explanations of how certain offices, that are virtually hidden, were exploited, and why the "panic buttons" of certain other offices, were disabled.

Early on, that made no sense. Now with all the information that has come out, plus the news about just the specific windows that could be exploited being exploited, it sounds like members of the Capitol Police were in on it from the beginning.

And like they were planning on murdering certain lawmakers or using rape as a method of torture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Fascinating.

Here I am, walking and chewing gum at the same time, and this drops out of the sky.

Pence is still a Republican though. Even though he got leopard spit sprayed in his face that day, he still supports the leopards eating faces party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We still don't have explanations of how certain offices, that are virtually hidden, were exploited, and why the "panic buttons" of certain other offices, were disabled.

Early on, that made no sense. Now with all the information that has come out, plus the news about just the specific windows that could be exploited being exploited, it sounds like members of the Capitol Police were in on it from the beginning.

And like they were planning on murdering certain lawmakers or using rape as a method of torture.

Why do you assume it was the Capitol Police? Were they the only ones who knew which windows weren't reinforced, and had access to the panic buttons? This is a real question. I would think that other people would know that, and I would think that not every Capitol Police person would know about a few non-reinforced windows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We still don't have explanations of how certain offices, that are virtually hidden, were exploited, and why the "panic buttons" of certain other offices, were disabled.

Early on, that made no sense. Now with all the information that has come out, plus the news about just the specific windows that could be exploited being exploited, it sounds like members of the Capitol Police were in on it from the beginning.

And like they were planning on murdering certain lawmakers or using rape as a method of torture.

Why do you assume it was the Capitol Police? Were they the only ones who knew which windows weren't reinforced, and had access to the panic buttons? This is a real question. I would think that other people would know that, and I would think that not every Capitol Police person would know about a few non-reinforced windows.

As I posted earlier in this thread or another one, I can’t imagine very many people having the info about the windows. It’s either people in the USCP or the AOC - the Architect of the Capitol. Perhaps the details of the years long renovation are public somewhere but I doubt it to that level of detail and compromising security.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We still don't have explanations of how certain offices, that are virtually hidden, were exploited, and why the "panic buttons" of certain other offices, were disabled.

Early on, that made no sense. Now with all the information that has come out, plus the news about just the specific windows that could be exploited being exploited, it sounds like members of the Capitol Police were in on it from the beginning.

And like they were planning on murdering certain lawmakers or using rape as a method of torture.

Why do you assume it was the Capitol Police? Were they the only ones who knew which windows weren't reinforced, and had access to the panic buttons? This is a real question. I would think that other people would know that, and I would think that not every Capitol Police person would know about a few non-reinforced windows.

I didn’t say every Capitol Police. Clearly several of them gave their lives in protecting democracy. But it’s obvious that there was organization and coordination among high level individuals. Including the wife of a Supreme Court Justice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Burning documents in the fireplace at the White House seems obstructiony.

You thinking burning documents in the fireplace seems obstructiony, but tearing them up and flushing them down a toilet was not?

That's a fine line to draw over obstruction of justice.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Burning documents in the fireplace at the White House seems obstructiony.

Sure does.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/26/meadows-burned-papers-meeting-scott-perry-00035411

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Burning documents in the fireplace at the White House seems obstructiony.

Sure does.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/26/meadows-burned-papers-meeting-scott-perry-00035411

Lock him up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Burning documents in the fireplace at the White House seems obstructiony.

How does it appear to be requesting the relevant documents ahead of your testimony?

[Anonymous]

So Peter Navarro is fighting a 1/6 committee subpoena and one from a grand jury. Representing himself.