Metro United

[Anonymous]

ECNL parents are always so worried about DA teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well you are going to have to stay tuned. Thanks for checking on us. Kinda nice to know parents from other clubs care so much about my DD’s team.

I for one actually do. I know many, many parents and players over there from years of soccer. All of them are good players that chose MU for one reason or another.

I'd rather see one of the bad ECNL teams fold to help send the 1-2 decent players those teams have over to the DA side.

Oh, I'm a DA parent as well and my kid has played both. ECNL is a joke compared to the DA in the DMV.

I agree. The quality of training and coaching at DA versus ECNL is night and day. That’s why we picked MU versus ECNL.

You do realize it’s club by club? Do you think FCV practice looks like a metro practice? They probably differ. The same for Richmond an McLean. All of you get so wrapped up in what patch your kid is wearing. Worry about the team and coach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well you are going to have to stay tuned. Thanks for checking on us. Kinda nice to know parents from other clubs care so much about my DD’s team.

I for one actually do. I know many, many parents and players over there from years of soccer. All of them are good players that chose MU for one reason or another.

I'd rather see one of the bad ECNL teams fold to help send the 1-2 decent players those teams have over to the DA side.

Oh, I'm a DA parent as well and my kid has played both. ECNL is a joke compared to the DA in the DMV.

I agree. The quality of training and coaching at DA versus ECNL is night and day. That’s why we picked MU versus ECNL.

You do realize it’s club by club? Do you think FCV practice looks like a metro practice? They probably differ. The same for Richmond an McLean. All of you get so wrapped up in what patch your kid is wearing. Worry about the team and coach.

Only comparing what I have seen. DA intensity at practices is at another level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well you are going to have to stay tuned. Thanks for checking on us. Kinda nice to know parents from other clubs care so much about my DD’s team.

I for one actually do. I know many, many parents and players over there from years of soccer. All of them are good players that chose MU for one reason or another.

I'd rather see one of the bad ECNL teams fold to help send the 1-2 decent players those teams have over to the DA side.

Oh, I'm a DA parent as well and my kid has played both. ECNL is a joke compared to the DA in the DMV.

I agree. The quality of training and coaching at DA versus ECNL is night and day. That’s why we picked MU versus ECNL.

You do realize it’s club by club? Do you think FCV practice looks like a metro practice? They probably differ. The same for Richmond an McLean. All of you get so wrapped up in what patch your kid is wearing. Worry about the team and coach.

How would you say they differ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well you are going to have to stay tuned. Thanks for checking on us. Kinda nice to know parents from other clubs care so much about my DD’s team.

I for one actually do. I know many, many parents and players over there from years of soccer. All of them are good players that chose MU for one reason or another.

I'd rather see one of the bad ECNL teams fold to help send the 1-2 decent players those teams have over to the DA side.

Oh, I'm a DA parent as well and my kid has played both. ECNL is a joke compared to the DA in the DMV.

I agree. The quality of training and coaching at DA versus ECNL is night and day. That’s why we picked MU versus ECNL.

You do realize it’s club by club? Do you think FCV practice looks like a metro practice? They probably differ. The same for Richmond an McLean. All of you get so wrapped up in what patch your kid is wearing. Worry about the team and coach.

Only comparing what I have seen. DA intensity at practices is at another level.

Bawhaaaaaaaaaa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well you are going to have to stay tuned. Thanks for checking on us. Kinda nice to know parents from other clubs care so much about my DD’s team.

I for one actually do. I know many, many parents and players over there from years of soccer. All of them are good players that chose MU for one reason or another.

I'd rather see one of the bad ECNL teams fold to help send the 1-2 decent players those teams have over to the DA side.

Oh, I'm a DA parent as well and my kid has played both. ECNL is a joke compared to the DA in the DMV.

I agree. The quality of training and coaching at DA versus ECNL is night and day. That’s why we picked MU versus ECNL.

You do realize it’s club by club? Do you think FCV practice looks like a metro practice? They probably differ. The same for Richmond an McLean. All of you get so wrapped up in what patch your kid is wearing. Worry about the team and coach.

Only comparing what I have seen. DA intensity at practices is at another level.

Bawhaaaaaaaaaa.

So you have no answer for how they differ. Didn’t think so.

[Anonymous]

My DD has played both and trained in both environments. I would agree that the DA training she is receiving is more intense and more beneficial to her development than the ECNL training.

I won't say which clubs so don't ask.

But excellent coaches at both. I'd just give the nod to the DA as the better training environment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My DD has played both and trained in both environments. I would agree that the DA training she is receiving is more intense and more beneficial to her development than the ECNL training.

I won't say which clubs so don't ask.

But excellent coaches at both. I'd just give the nod to the DA as the better training environment.

McLean to MU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My DD has played both and trained in both environments. I would agree that the DA training she is receiving is more intense and more beneficial to her development than the ECNL training.

I won't say which clubs so don't ask.

But excellent coaches at both. I'd just give the nod to the DA as the better training environment.

Absoulty absurd to equate training enviroment with league affiliation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My DD has played both and trained in both environments. I would agree that the DA training she is receiving is more intense and more beneficial to her development than the ECNL training.

I won't say which clubs so don't ask.

But excellent coaches at both. I'd just give the nod to the DA as the better training environment.

McLean to MU.

or MU to VDA
or MU to BRYC
or MU to Loudoun
or FCV to Loudoun
or McLean to FCV
or Maryland United to Baltimore Armour
or ...

Nice try though

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My DD has played both and trained in both environments. I would agree that the DA training she is receiving is more intense and more beneficial to her development than the ECNL training.

I won't say which clubs so don't ask.

But excellent coaches at both. I'd just give the nod to the DA as the better training environment.

McLean to MU.

or MU to VDA
or MU to BRYC
or MU to Loudoun
or FCV to Loudoun
or McLean to FCV
or Maryland United to Baltimore Armour
or ...

Nice try though

Could be...but it's not

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My DD has played both and trained in both environments. I would agree that the DA training she is receiving is more intense and more beneficial to her development than the ECNL training.

I won't say which clubs so don't ask.

But excellent coaches at both. I'd just give the nod to the DA as the better training environment.

McLean to MU.

or MU to VDA
or MU to BRYC
or MU to Loudoun
or FCV to Loudoun
or McLean to FCV
or Maryland United to Baltimore Armour
or ...

Nice try though

Could be...but it's not

Actually, it is one of the ...

I didn't list it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My DD has played both and trained in both environments. I would agree that the DA training she is receiving is more intense and more beneficial to her development than the ECNL training.

I won't say which clubs so don't ask.

But excellent coaches at both. I'd just give the nod to the DA as the better training environment.

McLean to MU.

or MU to VDA
or MU to BRYC
or MU to Loudoun
or FCV to Loudoun
or McLean to FCV
or Maryland United to Baltimore Armour
or ...

Nice try though

Could be...but it's not

Actually, it is one of the ...

I didn't list it!

McLean to Arlington?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well you are going to have to stay tuned. Thanks for checking on us. Kinda nice to know parents from other clubs care so much about my DD’s team.

I for one actually do. I know many, many parents and players over there from years of soccer. All of them are good players that chose MU for one reason or another.

I'd rather see one of the bad ECNL teams fold to help send the 1-2 decent players those teams have over to the DA side.

Oh, I'm a DA parent as well and my kid has played both. ECNL is a joke compared to the DA in the DMV.

I agree. The quality of training and coaching at DA versus ECNL is night and day. That’s why we picked MU versus ECNL.

You do realize it’s club by club? Do you think FCV practice looks like a metro practice? They probably differ. The same for Richmond an McLean. All of you get so wrapped up in what patch your kid is wearing. Worry about the team and coach.

Only comparing what I have seen. DA intensity at practices is at another level.

LOL. Watching loudoun vs fcv maybe.

[Anonymous]

Not just watching, but past participation as well.