Pelosi’s husband assaulted during breakin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

+1
I found it odd that he didn’t just say YES when the operator asked if he needed assistance. Was he on speaker phone?

Clearly Depape could hear what the operator was saying because when she asked Pelosi what the man's name was Depape answered and said his name was David.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

+1
I found it odd that he didn’t just say YES when the operator asked if he needed assistance. Was he on speaker phone?

Clearly Depape could hear what the operator was saying because when she asked Pelosi what the man's name was Depape answered and said his name was David.

I think Pelosi could clearly tell DePape was mentally off and I think he was probably trying to see if he could get DePape to tell the dispatcher that he needed mental health intervention. Pelosi was telling the dispatcher that he (Pelosi) thought there was a problem and was trying to see if he could get DePape to acknowledge he was having a mental meltdown to get the right kind of help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

+1
I found it odd that he didn’t just say YES when the operator asked if he needed assistance. Was he on speaker phone?

I think yes because I wondered the same and that is what I decide. Must have been on speaker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

Funny how the Fox News talking points are repeated in this thread even after the video was leased - drink in his hand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

DP. Note that the FOX hosts are calling him out on it? I do hope you noticed that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

DP. Note that the FOX hosts are calling him out on it? I do hope you noticed that.

Yes I did, that’s why I posted it. Even Fox News hosts and Mark Levin have given up lying about this incident and yet people on this thread persist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

DP. Note that the FOX hosts are calling him out on it? I do hope you noticed that.

Yes I did, that’s why I posted it. Even Fox News hosts and Mark Levin have given up lying about this incident and yet people on this thread persist.

Except NO ONE is "persisting" - what are you even talking about?

There are still people here saying Pelosi’s reactions were weird, that the 911 call wasn’t normal and on and on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

DP. Note that the FOX hosts are calling him out on it? I do hope you noticed that.

Yes I did, that’s why I posted it. Even Fox News hosts and Mark Levin have given up lying about this incident and yet people on this thread persist.

Except NO ONE is "persisting" - what are you even talking about?

There are still people here saying Pelosi’s reactions were weird, that the 911 call wasn’t normal and on and on.

They are allowed to make those observations. Maybe you need to stop taking it so personally?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

DP. Note that the FOX hosts are calling him out on it? I do hope you noticed that.

Yes I did, that’s why I posted it. Even Fox News hosts and Mark Levin have given up lying about this incident and yet people on this thread persist.

Except NO ONE is "persisting" - what are you even talking about?

There are still people here saying Pelosi’s reactions were weird, that the 911 call wasn’t normal and on and on.

They are allowed to make those observations. Maybe you need to stop taking it so personally?

I’m not taking it personally. It’s just amazing when even these cretins get it and there are still people here who don’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, saw the video, listened to the 911 call.

Was wrong about this.

This was clearly attempted murder by a crazy guy. Video should’ve been released within days of it happening to dispel all the appearance of conspiracy.

Also, the 911 call taker needs to be fired. Unforgivably horrible job on her part.

Hope Mr Pelosi recovers fully. He’s lucky to be alive.

surely you know there is a reason the law works slowly. they absolutely have to get it right. maybe people need to learn how to be patient, reasonable citizens, not children who need instant gratification.

The video has absolutely nothing to do with how slowly the wheels of the courts turn. The video is the video. It doesn’t change a thing.

well... I hope someday you find yourself in the position where the police have a video of you and rush it out without careful procedures.

If I ever find myself in that position, I hope so to. Then there will be no rumors or speculation about whatever happened.

since you seem quite childish, I imagine there will be lots of rumors. Everybody knows not to jump to conclusions when these things happen, except you. only children listen to rumors or speculation after things like this.

DP. Wow. So you didn’t just “rush to conclusions” after the substation attack in NC? How about when Rand Paul was attacked? Steele dossier/pee pee tape? Kavanaugh allegations? Covington Catholic boy? Dobbs leak? And so so many more instances. Get off your high and mighty horse and spare us all your sanctimony.

How are any of these remotely the same as the husband of the Speaker of the House suffering a home invasion by a fringe loon, then near-murder with a hammer, followed by partisans spewing total made-up lies to attempt to displace blame? I think the only reasonable comparison would be if the man who shot Scalise had been theorized by prominent lefties to actually be his jealous ex-lover rather than someone with political motives.

I also seem to remember the nutjob who stopped short of murdering Kavanaugh - that whole situation was pooh-poohed by the usual Dems on this forum, completely dismissed as nothing. While he did not actually harm Kavanaugh, the intent was clear - he actually admitted his plans and was caught with weapons on him. But how did the left react? "Oh, who cares. He didn't actually go through with it. No biggie." I mean, are you people really this clueless or are you just excellent at playing dumb? Regardless - not a good look. So you can shut up about the same kind of reactions from the right. You do it yourselves, pretty much on the daily.
DP

Which elected Democratic politicians cracked jokes about Kavanaugh’s would be assault? And made innuendos that it was Kavanaugh’s lover?

Crickets.

Meanwhile…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, saw the video, listened to the 911 call.

Was wrong about this.

This was clearly attempted murder by a crazy guy. Video should’ve been released within days of it happening to dispel all the appearance of conspiracy.

Also, the 911 call taker needs to be fired. Unforgivably horrible job on her part.

Hope Mr Pelosi recovers fully. He’s lucky to be alive.

surely you know there is a reason the law works slowly. they absolutely have to get it right. maybe people need to learn how to be patient, reasonable citizens, not children who need instant gratification.

The video has absolutely nothing to do with how slowly the wheels of the courts turn. The video is the video. It doesn’t change a thing.

well... I hope someday you find yourself in the position where the police have a video of you and rush it out without careful procedures.

If I ever find myself in that position, I hope so to. Then there will be no rumors or speculation about whatever happened.

since you seem quite childish, I imagine there will be lots of rumors. Everybody knows not to jump to conclusions when these things happen, except you. only children listen to rumors or speculation after things like this.

DP. Wow. So you didn’t just “rush to conclusions” after the substation attack in NC? How about when Rand Paul was attacked? Steele dossier/pee pee tape? Kavanaugh allegations? Covington Catholic boy? Dobbs leak? And so so many more instances. Get off your high and mighty horse and spare us all your sanctimony.

How are any of these remotely the same as the husband of the Speaker of the House suffering a home invasion by a fringe loon, then near-murder with a hammer, followed by partisans spewing total made-up lies to attempt to displace blame? I think the only reasonable comparison would be if the man who shot Scalise had been theorized by prominent lefties to actually be his jealous ex-lover rather than someone with political motives.

I also seem to remember the nutjob who stopped short of murdering Kavanaugh - that whole situation was pooh-poohed by the usual Dems on this forum, completely dismissed as nothing. While he did not actually harm Kavanaugh, the intent was clear - he actually admitted his plans and was caught with weapons on him. But how did the left react? "Oh, who cares. He didn't actually go through with it. No biggie." I mean, are you people really this clueless or are you just excellent at playing dumb? Regardless - not a good look. So you can shut up about the same kind of reactions from the right. You do it yourselves, pretty much on the daily.
DP

Which elected Democratic politicians cracked jokes about Kavanaugh’s would be assault? And made innuendos that it was Kavanaugh’s lover?

Crickets.

Meanwhile…

Thanks for finding this.

The GOP is insane. Their elected officials are nuts, their talking heads are worse and their voters are willing to support anything if they think it “OwNs ThE dEmS.” Footage is now out and right wingers are on this thread are still trying to say that Pelosi was wrong or in on it or whatever. Sorry I’m not more articulate on whatever garbage conspiracies you right wingers have been pushing; it’s garbage and I see no point in treating it like it’s legitimate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

DP. Note that the FOX hosts are calling him out on it? I do hope you noticed that.

Yes I did, that’s why I posted it. Even Fox News hosts and Mark Levin have given up lying about this incident and yet people on this thread persist.

Except NO ONE is "persisting" - what are you even talking about?

There are still people here saying Pelosi’s reactions were weird, that the 911 call wasn’t normal and on and on.

They are allowed to make those observations. Maybe you need to stop taking it so personally?

How is it an "observation" when it was never supported by any of the of the police reports, official accounts, statements or anything else?
None of the accounts said they were both in their underwear or naked. None of them said DePape was in anything other than street clothes.
None of the accounts said anything about a gay relationship, or that DePape was a gay prostitute. None of them said anything about a lovers fight, let alone that they knew each other (they didn't). Nor "they both had hammers" et cetera.

THAT. WAS. ALL. MADE. UP. It wasn't "observations." All of that was made up. Completely fabricated from nothing, completely unsupported by any actual information. And then it was widely repeated and amplified all over social media, even though it was total and complete fiction, including by prominent Republican elected officials and news figures.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, the reactions of them both, in particularly PP looks extremely odd, like there is more there there.

Is this you, PP?

DP. Note that the FOX hosts are calling him out on it? I do hope you noticed that.

Yes I did, that’s why I posted it. Even Fox News hosts and Mark Levin have given up lying about this incident and yet people on this thread persist.

Except NO ONE is "persisting" - what are you even talking about?

There are still people here saying Pelosi’s reactions were weird, that the 911 call wasn’t normal and on and on.

They are allowed to make those observations. Maybe you need to stop taking it so personally?

I’m not taking it personally. It’s just amazing when even these cretins get it and there are still people here who don’t.

Amazing how minds are changed with more information. There was no need to delay release. The case, based on video and witnessed attack by police, also on video made the case open and shut. The information was held back seemingly due to politics and then only released when holding it back, backfired. I personally knew the attack was brutal and clear from the beginning, but I can also see how holding information back gave room for speculation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given the aftermath of Rand Paul’s brutal attack and how the media treated it/him and how DCUM STILL behaves regarding that attack, I’m surprised about how outraged people are here

Can you link to a long list of politicians who suggested it was male prostitution?
Can you link to national news stories pushing one (false) narrative while PLAYING THE CONTRADICTORY VIDEO?
Can you explain how a politically motivated stranger breaking into your house with a weapon because you are married to a politican is the same as an ongoing dispute between neighbors that crossed the line into violence?


I don't disagree with you - the Rand Paul attack was brutal and people mocking him is ahole behavior. Nevertheless I am not sure the two situations are exaatcly comparable. And a few jerks being mean is not the same as freaking Fox News - or any other national broadcast corp - trying to frame the victime despite clear contradictory evidence.

Both crappy but not the same.

There was an image posted above, which now seems to be broken. But here is a list with some:

Examples of elected officials and candidates who spread doubt, disinformation and conspiracy theories about the Pelosi attack:

Senator Ted Cruz
Republican of Texas
Amplified doubts that all facts were being disclosed.

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene
Republican of Georgia
Suggested Mr. Pelosi knew his attacker.

Representative Clay Higgins
Republican of Louisiana
Suggested the attack involved male prostitution.

Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson
Republican of North Carolina
Raised doubts about the details of the attack.

Mary Williams Benefield
Republican statehouse candidate of Georgia
Suggested the attack might have been staged.

State Senator Wendy Rogers
Republican of Arizona
Suggested the attack might have been staged.

State Representative Anthony Sabatini
Republican of Florida
Suggested that the Pelosis are hiding vital information.

Representative Claudia Tenney
Republican of New York
Amplified a conspiracy theory about an extramarital gay affair.

Other Prominent figures who spread doubt, disinformation and conspiracy theories about the Pelosi attack:

Glenn Beck
Conservative commentator
Raised doubts about the details of the attack.

Tucker Carlson
Fox News host
Raised doubts about the details of the attack.

Dinesh D’Souza
Conservative commentator
Claimed the attack involved an extramarital gay affair.

Ryan Fournier
Founder, Students for Trump
Claimed details about the attacker were fabricated.

Sebastian Gorka
Former Trump adviser and podcast host
Raised doubts about the details of the attack.

Pete Hegseth
Fox News host
Raised doubts that all facts were being disclosed.

Megyn Kelly
Talk show host
Raised doubts that all facts were being disclosed.

Elon Musk
Chief executive of Twitter and Tesla
Amplified a conspiracy theory about male prostitution.

Devin Nunes
Former representative of California
Repeated a false report that the attacker was in his underwear.

Michael Savage
Talk show host
Raised doubts that all facts were being disclosed.

Roger Stone
Trump associate
Suggested the attack was staged.

Donald J. Trump
Former president
Suggested the attack was staged.

Royce White
House candidate of Minnesota
Claimed the attack involved an extramarital gay affair.

And there are many, many more, including blue-check-marked conservatives on twitter with thousands of followers who are STILL, AS OF THIS WEEK trying to push those kinds of debunked smear and disinfo campaigns.