Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Meanwhile, at today’s bail hearing:

“Lock Me Up in My New York Mansion, Jeffrey Epstein Says”

https://www.courthousenews.com/lock-me-up-in-my-new-york-mansion-jeffrey-epstein-says/

How about if he lets them physically castrate him he can sit eunuchlike in his mansion. Otherwise no go.

Sexual predators will use their hands, tongue, lips, and objects to predate. Chemical Castration only limits them slightly.

Death penalty it is!

Agree. Every man or woman convicted of abusing a child or children should be put to death. Immediately after conviction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: Meanwhile, at today’s bail hearing:

“Lock Me Up in My New York Mansion, Jeffrey Epstein Says”

https://www.courthousenews.com/lock-me-up-in-my-new-york-mansion-jeffrey-epstein-says/

And then there’s the part that his lawyers tried to argue that not locking him up in his mansion would be discrimination...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Meanwhile, at today’s bail hearing:

“Lock Me Up in My New York Mansion, Jeffrey Epstein Says”

https://www.courthousenews.com/lock-me-up-in-my-new-york-mansion-jeffrey-epstein-says/

How about if he lets them physically castrate him he can sit eunuchlike in his mansion. Otherwise no go.

Sexual predators will use their hands, tongue, lips, and objects to predate. Chemical Castration only limits them slightly.

I agree. In the old Arab world eunuchs guarded the harem. Castrating adult post pubescent men makes them angry and more aggressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can I just say that having read through this thread - We are talking about our President! My skin is crawling.

God I miss the good ole' Obama days.

That he squats in the White House is bad enough, but it’s the full throated defense of that pervert that’s worse.

The woman claiming to be raped as a 13 year old by Trump is a complete liar.

So sayeth the devils handmaiden

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

Vox article is the devil’s handmaiden?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump Rape Accusers Turn On Each Other

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-rape-accusers-turn-on-each-other

“The accuser—who used the name Katie Johnson to file a lawsuit in Manhattan Federal Court—alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her in the summer of 1994, when she was 13, while attending a sex party at the New York City mansion of notorious pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. The claim was basically a repeat of her earlier lawsuit, filed in California in May without legal representation, which was dismissed on procedural grounds for failing to make a claim under an applicable statute.”

So far, so good. Sort of.


“This time around, Johnson had a team of supporters behind her—a motley crew that included anti-abortion conservative donor Steve Baer and a man who calls himself “Al Taylor,” a mysterious foul-mouthed ex-producer of The Jerry Springer Show, the two unified by one common passion: a blinding hatred for Donald Trump.

For a time, it seemed like a perfect marriage between a #NeverTrump Republican with money to spend and a penniless woman and her handler who allegedly had the ammunition to sink the Republican nominee.”

Jerry Springer producer? SIGN ME UP!


“Baer and Taylor, both eccentric in their own right, have turned on each other in a war of escalating all-caps emails. Baer now claims he is withholding additional financial support for Johnson. He and Taylor are threatening to sue one another. And Baer’s antics—which include delivering an unpixelated tape, of a woman he claims to be Katie Johnson, to GOP presidential hopefuls and House Speaker Paul Ryan—allegedly brought the FBI and the police to his door.“

Financial support withdrawn? Shits about to get real up in here.

“Taylor says he met Katie Johnson a few years ago at a party, where she allegedly told him that she had been raped as a teen by Trump. (The Guardian has convincingly reported that “Taylor” is actually a publicity-loving conspiracy peddler named Norm Lubow, a theory that Taylor has fervently denied: “AL TAYLOR, BORN AL TAYLOR, ALWAYS BEEN AL TAYLOR AND ALWAYS WILL BE AL TAYLOR,” he signed a recent email.)“

So the Guardian found out the guy was using a fake name/persona? Excellent!

“In February 2016, when it seemed possible that Trump could clinch the GOP nomination, Johnson, with Taylor’s help, decided to make what Taylor called a “murder insurance” video where she—disguised in a wig–would offer details of her alleged attack. They hired a videographer, Jonathann Launer, and agreed to pay him with a 20 percent stake in whatever money the tape might bring in from tabloids willing to purchase it.“

Bingo! Get that paper whoever you all are!

“Despite numerous attempts to meet with Katie Johnson—and repeated promises from Meagher to produce her for an interview—The Daily Beast has never spoken with Trump’s accuser.”

Nice try, Daily Beast. We know you are actually not reporters but MURDERERS! Good thing there’s the murder insurance YouTube video. Amateurs.

“Though Baer says he has never actually seen Katie Johnson, he claims he has spoken to her on the phone and watched her 48-minute video. And with sworn affidavits and a pending federal case, Bear viewed Johnson’s allegations against Trump as a “slam dunk.”

“I believe her,” Baer told The Daily Beast.”

Ok, who has seen Katie Johnson? Anyone?

So on May 20, Baer says, he wired $19,000 to California.

A portion of that money, $13,000, was sent to Taylor, ostensibly for Johnson, to cover a move to her own apartment, where only Taylor would know her whereabouts. “Well, that’s what I was told,” Baer said, “They could have gone and partied.”

“The remaining cash was sent to Jonathann Launer, in exchange for his stake in the video’s potential earnings. (Launer did not return a request for comment, but both Taylor and Baer confirmed this account.) Meanwhile, Taylor was shopping the video of Johnson to outlets like Gawker, with a suggested price tag of $1 million, and a promise to spend any funds on Johnson’s protection—to keep her safe from Trump and Epstein, whom Taylor contends will have her killed if they can find her. As of this writing, no one has purchased it.“

Totally aboveboard. Honest. Believable.

“Baer also maintains the website JusticeforKatie.org, a repository for documents related to Johnson’s case and a place to donate to the Justice for Katie Legal Fund and Trust. “Armed personal security, private detectives, researchers, transport, safe housing, lawyers, polygraph experts and paralegals are needed now,” the website claims. Baer says that so far, he has been the only contributor to the trust, which technically owns Launer’s share of Johnson’s video, and that the fund holds $4.50.“

I cant even pretend this is real anymore. It’s bizzare.

“Several of the clips from that video, with Katie’s face pixelated, are available online, posted by one “Bianca Manix.” A person using the same name has posted the videos along with a “Trump Victims Unite” Facebook page, to other anti-Trump Facebook pages. And a Twitter account belonging to Bianca Manix has six tweets.”

Uhhhhhh thank you Daily Beast, for that magical ride into an episode of whatever the hell that is, but sure isn’t anything that democrats will read and understand that their “Trump raped a 13 year old” hysteria is based on grifters, lies, an invisible victim, and a YouTube video shopped around for $100k.

And the Daily Beast? Both have in depth analysis of the woman and her support and the case; it’s not true.

[Anonymous]

FOX News' Judge Napoliatano predicts Acosta will resign by Friday. Can we place our bets now? Put me down for 3:30 p.m. #ETTD https://thehill.com/homenews/media/452583-foxs-napolitano-predicts-acosta-will-be-out-as-labor-secretary-by-end-of-week

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FOX News' Judge Napoliatano predicts Acosta will resign by Friday. Can we place our bets now? Put me down for 3:30 p.m. #ETTD https://thehill.com/homenews/media/452583-foxs-napolitano-predicts-acosta-will-be-out-as-labor-secretary-by-end-of-week

4:55pm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did Epstein make so much money?

Wail street financier

Not true. This was investigated by journalists. No one on Wall Street does business with his company; he doesn't have prime brokerage accounts with any of them. So he's definitely not buying/selling/trading securities or in the derivative markets. This area is supposed to be his expertise, but he's not participating in it.

Journalists discovered that Epstein - somehow - controls and manages the wealth of Les Wexler, the billionaire owner of Limited clothing brands. But it's not clear what he does with that wealth. Further, Wexler is "only" worth $2-3bn so that wouldn't make Epstein a billionaire.

My guess is that Epstein is like Trump: he pretends he has more money than he does. He collects dirt on others, sells that dirt, and stiffs people to whom he owes money. My guess is that Epstein collects blackmail against wealthy individuals, shakes them down for money, and sells the blackmail to the mafia and foreign intelligence agencies. That would explain his hidden cameras found in his homes.

Epstein wants to keep the info on his finances under seal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

Vox article is the devil’s handmaiden?

So if liberal media is debunking her, but liberal media is fake, does that mean she's telling the truth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

Vox article is the devil’s handmaiden?

So if liberal media is debunking her, but liberal media is fake, does that mean she's telling the truth?

Most people don't believe that story pp but Donald has done plenty apart from that to warrant our disgust.

If you want to litigate Katie Johnson start your own thread. Jeffrey Epstein's guilt is not really in question. Stop questioning the accounts of victims in a thread that is primarily about a child sex trafficker, have some decency

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

Vox article is the devil’s handmaiden?

So if liberal media is debunking her, but liberal media is fake, does that mean she's telling the truth?

Most people don't believe that story pp but Donald has done plenty apart from that to warrant our disgust.

If you want to litigate Katie Johnson start your own thread. Jeffrey Epstein's guilt is not really in question. Stop questioning the accounts of victims in a thread that is primarily about a child sex trafficker, have some decency

A liberal started posting about the 13 year old rape victim that no journalist has ever seen or detective interviewed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

Vox article is the devil’s handmaiden?

So if liberal media is debunking her, but liberal media is fake, does that mean she's telling the truth?

Most people don't believe that story pp but Donald has done plenty apart from that to warrant our disgust.

If you want to litigate Katie Johnson start your own thread. Jeffrey Epstein's guilt is not really in question. Stop questioning the accounts of victims in a thread that is primarily about a child sex trafficker, have some decency

A liberal started posting about the 13 year old rape victim that no journalist has ever seen or detective interviewed.

Last time I checked two wrongs don't make a right. One of those foundational lessons we learn as children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most people don't believe that story pp but Donald has done plenty apart from that to warrant our disgust.

If you want to litigate Katie Johnson start your own thread. Jeffrey Epstein's guilt is not really in question. Stop questioning the accounts of victims in a thread that is primarily about a child sex trafficker, have some decency

+1
This attempt to smear all the many victims of Trump is off topic and frankly more than a little bit pathetic. By his own admission, Trump is a serial sexual assaulter. He has ties to Epstein and more than a few to Cindy Yang (as well as another Chinese national who got busted for trafficking, though I couldn’t find an article that said they were close). Trump’s personal attorney Barr recused, then unrecused. None of it suggests Donald’s innocence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Date this videotaped interview aired: Nov. 4, 2016. Days before the 2016 election.
Not curious at all, is it?

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality TV producer who calls himself “Al Taylor” and a “Never Trump” conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite. There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims. The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.

The lawsuit Johnson filed in New York was actually her second attempt to sue Trump and Epstein. The first was in California in April of this year, a claim Johnson filed herself that got thrown out on technical grounds — she’d filed a civil rights suit, but failed to actually state an applicable civil rights claim.

There were a couple of odd things about that lawsuit. The address listed on court documents as Johnson’s was actually a foreclosed, abandoned home, and the phone number was disconnected. Maybe Johnson was just using a fake address because she was homeless; she was, after all, also described as being indigent. But it’s fishy.

The lawsuit also described details that were so lurid — “almost cinematic in their depravity,” as Jezebel’s Anna Merlan put it — that they’re almost hard to believe. Some of those details were omitted from the second lawsuit, the New York Daily News reported:

Gone from the new lawsuit is an allegation that Trump threw money at the plaintiff for an abortion when she expressed fear about getting pregnant after being raped. Gone, too, is the allegation that Trump called co-defendant and accused pedophile and sex party host Jeffrey Epstein a “Jew bastard,” and her request for $100 million in damages.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

No it’s completely believable.

Thank you for posting this. The woman is a loon.

Vox article is the devil’s handmaiden?

So if liberal media is debunking her, but liberal media is fake, does that mean she's telling the truth?

Most people don't believe that story pp but Donald has done plenty apart from that to warrant our disgust.

If you want to litigate Katie Johnson start your own thread. Jeffrey Epstein's guilt is not really in question. Stop questioning the accounts of victims in a thread that is primarily about a child sex trafficker, have some decency

A liberal started posting about the 13 year old rape victim that no journalist has ever seen or detective interviewed.

Last time I checked two wrongs don't make a right. One of those foundational lessons we learn as children.

How about don’t bear false witness? Any lessons for people who lie about rape?

Save me from the stupidity.