So what happens when the Federal government can’t issue Nov Food Stamps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that there is no criticism at all of the things that farmers spend their farm subsidy money on. In fact, they appear to have no restrictions at all on their spending of that taxpayer money. Odd how this doesn't bother the MAGAs who are so so concerned about what food poor people buy.

Because they are lying about what this is really about for them. It's not even really about hating poor people. It's about hating Black people. Never mind that most SNAP beneficiaries are White. And never mind that their tired tropes were literally crafted by racist previous presidents, trying to manipulate White voters. When will you fools wise up?

Only 8% are White

Sorry, no. According to USDA:

White: 37%
African American: 25.7%
Hispanic: 15.6%
Asian: 3.9%
Native American: 1.3%
Multiracial: 1%
Race unknown: 17%

Wrong.

Sorry, but this is extremely wrong, and has been debunked.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/oct/27/food-stamps-SNAP-ethnicity-chart/

You fail. Do better.

Even if it were true, the OP is still wrong because Afghans are considered white on government forms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that there is no criticism at all of the things that farmers spend their farm subsidy money on. In fact, they appear to have no restrictions at all on their spending of that taxpayer money. Odd how this doesn't bother the MAGAs who are so so concerned about what food poor people buy.

Because they are lying about what this is really about for them. It's not even really about hating poor people. It's about hating Black people. Never mind that most SNAP beneficiaries are White. And never mind that their tired tropes were literally crafted by racist previous presidents, trying to manipulate White voters. When will you fools wise up?

Only 8% are White

Sorry, no. According to USDA:

White: 37%
African American: 25.7%
Hispanic: 15.6%
Asian: 3.9%
Native American: 1.3%
Multiracial: 1%
Race unknown: 17%

Wrong.

These numbers aren’t showing what you think they are. (Hint: add up all the percentages. Is the total over 100?)

Good lord, don't take any financial advice from whoever those self proclaimed "financial wizards" are. I think the only financial wizarding they can do is to make money disappear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, and they have parents. If you are capable of making a baby, you are capable of making a sandwich.

Best line of the thread.

What's the minimum IQ for getting pregnant, or getting someone pregnant?

Which mental illnesses prevent you from getting pregnant, or getting someone pregnant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7 of those are crap. Candy? JFC, I never got candy as a kid and my parents were loaded.

And 13 things are regular staples. I’d be fine blocking candy and soft drinks from purchases. I don’t have a problem with frozen novelties or snacks or cookies.

You should care. 24% of low income kids are obese, not just overweight, but obese. Compared to 10% obesity rate of kids not low income. It’s because they are and they are over consuming junk food, by a lot. Snap is given specifically to buy heathy foods and it’s being used to purchase junk.

This is an old article. Obesity rate has increased from 20% to 24% since 2015

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2015/december/gap-in-obesity-rates-between-low-and-high-income-children-widens-with-age

This thread is about SNAP being cut off. Can you stop? Do you think people should starve because they aren't buying food you approve?

You think people consuming 200% of the calories their body needs are at risk for starving?

Fat people still have to eat, and yes they can starve. What is wrong with you?

Of course, but less food. You think people receiving snap can buy zero food at all without snap?

And they be even more likely to buy crap food because it is cheap! They’re not going to buy ground beef or milk like they do now.

They’re going to buy ramen packs and other cheap crap.

There are many, many heathy options that are cheap, if not cheaper than junk. People buy the junk because of convenience and preference, not price.

Yep, this. We’ve gone over and over this. A 10 pound bag of potatoes is $5 at Aldi. Loaded Baked potatoes make a great meal, and you can make a ton of other sides. Or potato soup. These are all things I eat btw. Dry beans and rice are cheap. You can make all kind of meals with that and various fixing. A family pack of chicken thighs is $6 at Aldi. A pork roast is around 12 and makes a ton of meat.

And how should a family living out of their car prepare those things? Or maybe in a motel room with just a microwave? Do you have any idea how many thousands of people are in exactly those circumstance or that car living is on the rise in America?

It's willful ignorance. They want to believe people on SNAP don't work, sit around in their free apartments, playing on their Obama phones, popping out kids, paying for manicures and tattoos, and eating junk food all day living it up on government assistance.

Idk how many times it has to be said that this welfare queen image you have is not real. It was made up to manipulate you. The Nixon and Reagan administration's are on record admitting they made it up.

There are no people on SNAP who don’t want to work, buy or rent a stable home, better themselves, etc. They are desperate for it in fact.

They have all, along with their kids, simply fallen on hard times or there are no suitable jobs available to them in their area. That’s all.

So, NBC4 DC just did a story on people on SNAP considering giving up their pets. One woman interviewed estimated she spends nearly $400 on her dog. Seriously?

I feel sorry for those who really need these benefits but something is terribly wrong when people on SNAP can afford to take on the expense of pets when you consider food, worming, flea meds, yearly vaccinations & care in case something goes wrong.

People have physical and emotional needs. Being poor sucks and it's lonely and isolating. Many poor people have pets for various reasons, including for their emotional health. Why do you begrudge these people any speck of happiness they may have?

No sodas, no candy, no chips, no TV, no cell phones, no car, no self care, no kids, no pets. They should just work, eat rice and beans in the dark, and die.

I am not rich, but I am I guess middle class and a pet is really not in my budget right now. So we don’t have one. I would also love a weekly massage for self care, but I can’t afford it. Why should I subsidize someone else having a pet??

You aren't. You pay taxes to be part of our society. You don't have a pet because you've chosen to prioritize other things. Do you honestly want to trade places with the person on SNAP whose pound puppy is the only source of love and companionship they have? You people are like toddlers, whining about the little bit someone has, when you already have everything you need.

DP

So I disagree with this perspective completely and I'm a liberal and have a lot of sympathy for those less fortunate. I donate all the time. I'm for universal healthcare and believe in contributing to the whole of society in making my community a healthy and happy one.

However..

There is such a thing called decision making and some are better than others in this skill set. So I get that everyone wants to feel loved and appreciated and love animals but if I'm on SNAP, my first priority should NOT be relying on SNAP till the end of time! At some point I'm responsible for my own needs. If I need help that's one thing, if I am simply making decisions to make my self feel good and use govt funds to sustain myself then I'm failing at prioritizing correctly and at decision making in general.

I fear many have an inherent prob with SNAP because so many abuse their privileges. When you have a public system in a Democracy as rich as ours, people are going to mess up a lot and waste a lot of safety nets financially. It's a different culture elsewhere but there is such a streak of entitlement culturally here that I'm not sure SNAP should not be completely overhauled.

I believe some will impact tragically without SNAP but a lot will be just fine. Thankfully many states are able to provide. We really do have a prob in US of inequality but also of waste and useless govt overreach - not everything is right with govt even as I disagree with Trump and Rep approach in managing govt functionality.

here's a list from a group serving people with limited ability to cook who also rely on SNAP. It's all highly processed cheap food. This is the reality for alot of people.

Shelf-stable milk cartons (chocolate preferred)‬
‭Individual Cup of Noodles (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Individual Mac & Cheese cups (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Cheese or peanut butter cracker packs‬
‭Fruit cups (100% juice preferred)‬
‭Bars (granola, fruit, cereal, breakfast, protein)‬
‭Individual cups of instant oatmeal‬
‭Individual cups of cereal‬
‭100% juice boxes/pouches (no glass bottles; no soft drinks)‬
‭Prego Ready Meals, Barilla pasta entrees, Hormel Compleats‬
Chicken or tuna snack packs with crackers‬
Packets of trail mix or nuts‬
Individual beef sticks/beef jerky‬

I grew up blue collar/working class and we ate a lot of this (not necessarily the individual packs because those cost more, but still) plus hamburger helper, progresso, campbells and honestly it was fine. I’m thankful to not need to rely on these sorts of foods any more but it also doesn’t bother me to occasionally serve my kids instant oatmeal or boxed mac and cheese or tuna.

Same. People on this thread would ban most of this.

They want people to buy potatoes and cook dried beans. Food banks like potatoes but they don’t like dried beans because their clients don’t know what to do with them.

They also don’t like hamburger helper because it needs meat and they don’t like boxed Mac and cheese because it needs milk and butter.

They want cans with pop lids because clients don’t have can openers and they need easy to open things for people with dexterity issues like the elderly.

99% of people on food stamps have kitchens, have jobs, and are capable of making food. You’re acting like everyone on food stamps is dead, blind, immobile and living in a tree stump

Care to cite the source for this statistic?

According to USDA, 70% have full time employment. The remaining 30% are retirees and the disabled.

That doesn’t support 99% of people on snap have kitchens. Give us a cite for that.

There are a few million people living in cars and motel rooms. More than a million and half kids in were homeless as of 2018 and probably more now.

There are elderly and disabled people who have mobility and dexterity issues even if they have kitchens.

That’s why food banks request lots of easy to eat crap.

These people deserve to eat too.

Most retirees have refrigerators and microwaves, at least. As do the 70% of people working full time. And “disabled” is a very vague term that encompasses many abilities. Disabled people capable of living in independently can cook simple meals.

According to government data. 99.8% of US households have a fridge, 95% have a microwave, and 99.7% have either a cooktop, stove or range.

NP. What's your link? I'm curious as to how they define "household" -- e.g., does a temporary stay in a fleabag motel count as a "household" for these purposes, or are they not counted?

Multiple sources but primarily the Census Bureau. I used ChatGPT and then double checked the source

So you are unwilling to list what you double-checked as a link. Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7 of those are crap. Candy? JFC, I never got candy as a kid and my parents were loaded.

And 13 things are regular staples. I’d be fine blocking candy and soft drinks from purchases. I don’t have a problem with frozen novelties or snacks or cookies.

You should care. 24% of low income kids are obese, not just overweight, but obese. Compared to 10% obesity rate of kids not low income. It’s because they are and they are over consuming junk food, by a lot. Snap is given specifically to buy heathy foods and it’s being used to purchase junk.

This is an old article. Obesity rate has increased from 20% to 24% since 2015

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2015/december/gap-in-obesity-rates-between-low-and-high-income-children-widens-with-age

This thread is about SNAP being cut off. Can you stop? Do you think people should starve because they aren't buying food you approve?

You think people consuming 200% of the calories their body needs are at risk for starving?

Fat people still have to eat, and yes they can starve. What is wrong with you?

Of course, but less food. You think people receiving snap can buy zero food at all without snap?

And they be even more likely to buy crap food because it is cheap! They’re not going to buy ground beef or milk like they do now.

They’re going to buy ramen packs and other cheap crap.

There are many, many heathy options that are cheap, if not cheaper than junk. People buy the junk because of convenience and preference, not price.

Yep, this. We’ve gone over and over this. A 10 pound bag of potatoes is $5 at Aldi. Loaded Baked potatoes make a great meal, and you can make a ton of other sides. Or potato soup. These are all things I eat btw. Dry beans and rice are cheap. You can make all kind of meals with that and various fixing. A family pack of chicken thighs is $6 at Aldi. A pork roast is around 12 and makes a ton of meat.

And how should a family living out of their car prepare those things? Or maybe in a motel room with just a microwave? Do you have any idea how many thousands of people are in exactly those circumstance or that car living is on the rise in America?

It's willful ignorance. They want to believe people on SNAP don't work, sit around in their free apartments, playing on their Obama phones, popping out kids, paying for manicures and tattoos, and eating junk food all day living it up on government assistance.

Idk how many times it has to be said that this welfare queen image you have is not real. It was made up to manipulate you. The Nixon and Reagan administration's are on record admitting they made it up.

There are no people on SNAP who don’t want to work, buy or rent a stable home, better themselves, etc. They are desperate for it in fact.

They have all, along with their kids, simply fallen on hard times or there are no suitable jobs available to them in their area. That’s all.

So, NBC4 DC just did a story on people on SNAP considering giving up their pets. One woman interviewed estimated she spends nearly $400 on her dog. Seriously?

I feel sorry for those who really need these benefits but something is terribly wrong when people on SNAP can afford to take on the expense of pets when you consider food, worming, flea meds, yearly vaccinations & care in case something goes wrong.

People have physical and emotional needs. Being poor sucks and it's lonely and isolating. Many poor people have pets for various reasons, including for their emotional health. Why do you begrudge these people any speck of happiness they may have?

No sodas, no candy, no chips, no TV, no cell phones, no car, no self care, no kids, no pets. They should just work, eat rice and beans in the dark, and die.

I am not rich, but I am I guess middle class and a pet is really not in my budget right now. So we don’t have one. I would also love a weekly massage for self care, but I can’t afford it. Why should I subsidize someone else having a pet??

You aren't. You pay taxes to be part of our society. You don't have a pet because you've chosen to prioritize other things. Do you honestly want to trade places with the person on SNAP whose pound puppy is the only source of love and companionship they have? You people are like toddlers, whining about the little bit someone has, when you already have everything you need.

DP

So I disagree with this perspective completely and I'm a liberal and have a lot of sympathy for those less fortunate. I donate all the time. I'm for universal healthcare and believe in contributing to the whole of society in making my community a healthy and happy one.

However..

There is such a thing called decision making and some are better than others in this skill set. So I get that everyone wants to feel loved and appreciated and love animals but if I'm on SNAP, my first priority should NOT be relying on SNAP till the end of time! At some point I'm responsible for my own needs. If I need help that's one thing, if I am simply making decisions to make my self feel good and use govt funds to sustain myself then I'm failing at prioritizing correctly and at decision making in general.

I fear many have an inherent prob with SNAP because so many abuse their privileges. When you have a public system in a Democracy as rich as ours, people are going to mess up a lot and waste a lot of safety nets financially. It's a different culture elsewhere but there is such a streak of entitlement culturally here that I'm not sure SNAP should not be completely overhauled.

I believe some will impact tragically without SNAP but a lot will be just fine. Thankfully many states are able to provide. We really do have a prob in US of inequality but also of waste and useless govt overreach - not everything is right with govt even as I disagree with Trump and Rep approach in managing govt functionality.

here's a list from a group serving people with limited ability to cook who also rely on SNAP. It's all highly processed cheap food. This is the reality for alot of people.

Shelf-stable milk cartons (chocolate preferred)‬
‭Individual Cup of Noodles (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Individual Mac & Cheese cups (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Cheese or peanut butter cracker packs‬
‭Fruit cups (100% juice preferred)‬
‭Bars (granola, fruit, cereal, breakfast, protein)‬
‭Individual cups of instant oatmeal‬
‭Individual cups of cereal‬
‭100% juice boxes/pouches (no glass bottles; no soft drinks)‬
‭Prego Ready Meals, Barilla pasta entrees, Hormel Compleats‬
Chicken or tuna snack packs with crackers‬
Packets of trail mix or nuts‬
Individual beef sticks/beef jerky‬

I grew up blue collar/working class and we ate a lot of this (not necessarily the individual packs because those cost more, but still) plus hamburger helper, progresso, campbells and honestly it was fine. I’m thankful to not need to rely on these sorts of foods any more but it also doesn’t bother me to occasionally serve my kids instant oatmeal or boxed mac and cheese or tuna.

Same. People on this thread would ban most of this.

They want people to buy potatoes and cook dried beans. Food banks like potatoes but they don’t like dried beans because their clients don’t know what to do with them.

They also don’t like hamburger helper because it needs meat and they don’t like boxed Mac and cheese because it needs milk and butter.

They want cans with pop lids because clients don’t have can openers and they need easy to open things for people with dexterity issues like the elderly.

99% of people on food stamps have kitchens, have jobs, and are capable of making food. You’re acting like everyone on food stamps is dead, blind, immobile and living in a tree stump

Care to cite the source for this statistic?

According to USDA, 70% have full time employment. The remaining 30% are retirees and the disabled.

That doesn’t support 99% of people on snap have kitchens. Give us a cite for that.

There are a few million people living in cars and motel rooms. More than a million and half kids in were homeless as of 2018 and probably more now.

There are elderly and disabled people who have mobility and dexterity issues even if they have kitchens.

That’s why food banks request lots of easy to eat crap.

These people deserve to eat too.

Most retirees have refrigerators and microwaves, at least. As do the 70% of people working full time. And “disabled” is a very vague term that encompasses many abilities. Disabled people capable of living in independently can cook simple meals.

According to government data. 99.8% of US households have a fridge, 95% have a microwave, and 99.7% have either a cooktop, stove or range.

By definition, this excludes the homeless. Who are more likely to be on SNAP.

Of which there are about 780,000. No where near the millions claimed earlier.

https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2025/who-is-homeless-in-the-united-states-a-2025-update

Again they deserve to eat too. And I don’t buy the BS that you are magically ok with them getting to drink soda and eat fast food on the taxpayer dime if you begrudge them cup noodles.

[Anonymous]

From ages 8- 15 or so, my daughter and I did volunteer service feeding others. One place we worked at, the person in charge said something I will never forget: if you judge a person as you hand them food, you are doing it wrong. When we feed others, we don't concern ourselves with anything except handing them the food. (Of course if they are a criminal on a nearby wanted poster we'd call 911, but you know what he meant! Saying this because I know how this forum works.)

A few years later, I found myself suddenly a broke single mother. My daughter and I went to the food bank for a few years. Later, after she left home, she and her husband, a kind man that experienced homelessness as a child, held several events to feed the hungry in their city.

If a system needs fixing, work on it, but judging everyone that is in it while you sit in your warm home with health insurance, a car and good food is not helping anyone, nor is cutting off food to folks while shaking a finger instead of tackling the true problems of this country. Punching down is incredibly easy as opposed to reaching out with compassion.

And yeh, I know how it feels to work 4 or 5 jobs and cook and clean and try and survive. It's been over a decade and my body is damaged from it, permanently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7 of those are crap. Candy? JFC, I never got candy as a kid and my parents were loaded.

And 13 things are regular staples. I’d be fine blocking candy and soft drinks from purchases. I don’t have a problem with frozen novelties or snacks or cookies.

You should care. 24% of low income kids are obese, not just overweight, but obese. Compared to 10% obesity rate of kids not low income. It’s because they are and they are over consuming junk food, by a lot. Snap is given specifically to buy heathy foods and it’s being used to purchase junk.

This is an old article. Obesity rate has increased from 20% to 24% since 2015

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2015/december/gap-in-obesity-rates-between-low-and-high-income-children-widens-with-age

This thread is about SNAP being cut off. Can you stop? Do you think people should starve because they aren't buying food you approve?

You think people consuming 200% of the calories their body needs are at risk for starving?

Fat people still have to eat, and yes they can starve. What is wrong with you?

Of course, but less food. You think people receiving snap can buy zero food at all without snap?

And they be even more likely to buy crap food because it is cheap! They’re not going to buy ground beef or milk like they do now.

They’re going to buy ramen packs and other cheap crap.

There are many, many heathy options that are cheap, if not cheaper than junk. People buy the junk because of convenience and preference, not price.

Yep, this. We’ve gone over and over this. A 10 pound bag of potatoes is $5 at Aldi. Loaded Baked potatoes make a great meal, and you can make a ton of other sides. Or potato soup. These are all things I eat btw. Dry beans and rice are cheap. You can make all kind of meals with that and various fixing. A family pack of chicken thighs is $6 at Aldi. A pork roast is around 12 and makes a ton of meat.

And how should a family living out of their car prepare those things? Or maybe in a motel room with just a microwave? Do you have any idea how many thousands of people are in exactly those circumstance or that car living is on the rise in America?

It's willful ignorance. They want to believe people on SNAP don't work, sit around in their free apartments, playing on their Obama phones, popping out kids, paying for manicures and tattoos, and eating junk food all day living it up on government assistance.

Idk how many times it has to be said that this welfare queen image you have is not real. It was made up to manipulate you. The Nixon and Reagan administration's are on record admitting they made it up.

There are no people on SNAP who don’t want to work, buy or rent a stable home, better themselves, etc. They are desperate for it in fact.

They have all, along with their kids, simply fallen on hard times or there are no suitable jobs available to them in their area. That’s all.

So, NBC4 DC just did a story on people on SNAP considering giving up their pets. One woman interviewed estimated she spends nearly $400 on her dog. Seriously?

I feel sorry for those who really need these benefits but something is terribly wrong when people on SNAP can afford to take on the expense of pets when you consider food, worming, flea meds, yearly vaccinations & care in case something goes wrong.

People have physical and emotional needs. Being poor sucks and it's lonely and isolating. Many poor people have pets for various reasons, including for their emotional health. Why do you begrudge these people any speck of happiness they may have?

No sodas, no candy, no chips, no TV, no cell phones, no car, no self care, no kids, no pets. They should just work, eat rice and beans in the dark, and die.

I am not rich, but I am I guess middle class and a pet is really not in my budget right now. So we don’t have one. I would also love a weekly massage for self care, but I can’t afford it. Why should I subsidize someone else having a pet??

You aren't. You pay taxes to be part of our society. You don't have a pet because you've chosen to prioritize other things. Do you honestly want to trade places with the person on SNAP whose pound puppy is the only source of love and companionship they have? You people are like toddlers, whining about the little bit someone has, when you already have everything you need.

DP

So I disagree with this perspective completely and I'm a liberal and have a lot of sympathy for those less fortunate. I donate all the time. I'm for universal healthcare and believe in contributing to the whole of society in making my community a healthy and happy one.

However..

There is such a thing called decision making and some are better than others in this skill set. So I get that everyone wants to feel loved and appreciated and love animals but if I'm on SNAP, my first priority should NOT be relying on SNAP till the end of time! At some point I'm responsible for my own needs. If I need help that's one thing, if I am simply making decisions to make my self feel good and use govt funds to sustain myself then I'm failing at prioritizing correctly and at decision making in general.

I fear many have an inherent prob with SNAP because so many abuse their privileges. When you have a public system in a Democracy as rich as ours, people are going to mess up a lot and waste a lot of safety nets financially. It's a different culture elsewhere but there is such a streak of entitlement culturally here that I'm not sure SNAP should not be completely overhauled.

I believe some will impact tragically without SNAP but a lot will be just fine. Thankfully many states are able to provide. We really do have a prob in US of inequality but also of waste and useless govt overreach - not everything is right with govt even as I disagree with Trump and Rep approach in managing govt functionality.

here's a list from a group serving people with limited ability to cook who also rely on SNAP. It's all highly processed cheap food. This is the reality for alot of people.

Shelf-stable milk cartons (chocolate preferred)‬
‭Individual Cup of Noodles (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Individual Mac & Cheese cups (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Cheese or peanut butter cracker packs‬
‭Fruit cups (100% juice preferred)‬
‭Bars (granola, fruit, cereal, breakfast, protein)‬
‭Individual cups of instant oatmeal‬
‭Individual cups of cereal‬
‭100% juice boxes/pouches (no glass bottles; no soft drinks)‬
‭Prego Ready Meals, Barilla pasta entrees, Hormel Compleats‬
Chicken or tuna snack packs with crackers‬
Packets of trail mix or nuts‬
Individual beef sticks/beef jerky‬

I grew up blue collar/working class and we ate a lot of this (not necessarily the individual packs because those cost more, but still) plus hamburger helper, progresso, campbells and honestly it was fine. I’m thankful to not need to rely on these sorts of foods any more but it also doesn’t bother me to occasionally serve my kids instant oatmeal or boxed mac and cheese or tuna.

Same. People on this thread would ban most of this.

They want people to buy potatoes and cook dried beans. Food banks like potatoes but they don’t like dried beans because their clients don’t know what to do with them.

They also don’t like hamburger helper because it needs meat and they don’t like boxed Mac and cheese because it needs milk and butter.

They want cans with pop lids because clients don’t have can openers and they need easy to open things for people with dexterity issues like the elderly.

99% of people on food stamps have kitchens, have jobs, and are capable of making food. You’re acting like everyone on food stamps is dead, blind, immobile and living in a tree stump

Care to cite the source for this statistic?

According to USDA, 70% have full time employment. The remaining 30% are retirees and the disabled.

That doesn’t support 99% of people on snap have kitchens. Give us a cite for that.

There are a few million people living in cars and motel rooms. More than a million and half kids in were homeless as of 2018 and probably more now.

There are elderly and disabled people who have mobility and dexterity issues even if they have kitchens.

That’s why food banks request lots of easy to eat crap.

These people deserve to eat too.

Most retirees have refrigerators and microwaves, at least. As do the 70% of people working full time. And “disabled” is a very vague term that encompasses many abilities. Disabled people capable of living in independently can cook simple meals.

According to government data. 99.8% of US households have a fridge, 95% have a microwave, and 99.7% have either a cooktop, stove or range.

NP. What's your link? I'm curious as to how they define "household" -- e.g., does a temporary stay in a fleabag motel count as a "household" for these purposes, or are they not counted?

Multiple sources but primarily the Census Bureau. I used ChatGPT and then double checked the source

So you are unwilling to list what you double-checked as a link. Why?

Because i didn't save them. JFC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7 of those are crap. Candy? JFC, I never got candy as a kid and my parents were loaded.

And 13 things are regular staples. I’d be fine blocking candy and soft drinks from purchases. I don’t have a problem with frozen novelties or snacks or cookies.

You should care. 24% of low income kids are obese, not just overweight, but obese. Compared to 10% obesity rate of kids not low income. It’s because they are and they are over consuming junk food, by a lot. Snap is given specifically to buy heathy foods and it’s being used to purchase junk.

This is an old article. Obesity rate has increased from 20% to 24% since 2015

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2015/december/gap-in-obesity-rates-between-low-and-high-income-children-widens-with-age

This thread is about SNAP being cut off. Can you stop? Do you think people should starve because they aren't buying food you approve?

You think people consuming 200% of the calories their body needs are at risk for starving?

Fat people still have to eat, and yes they can starve. What is wrong with you?

Of course, but less food. You think people receiving snap can buy zero food at all without snap?

And they be even more likely to buy crap food because it is cheap! They’re not going to buy ground beef or milk like they do now.

They’re going to buy ramen packs and other cheap crap.

There are many, many heathy options that are cheap, if not cheaper than junk. People buy the junk because of convenience and preference, not price.

Yep, this. We’ve gone over and over this. A 10 pound bag of potatoes is $5 at Aldi. Loaded Baked potatoes make a great meal, and you can make a ton of other sides. Or potato soup. These are all things I eat btw. Dry beans and rice are cheap. You can make all kind of meals with that and various fixing. A family pack of chicken thighs is $6 at Aldi. A pork roast is around 12 and makes a ton of meat.

And how should a family living out of their car prepare those things? Or maybe in a motel room with just a microwave? Do you have any idea how many thousands of people are in exactly those circumstance or that car living is on the rise in America?

It's willful ignorance. They want to believe people on SNAP don't work, sit around in their free apartments, playing on their Obama phones, popping out kids, paying for manicures and tattoos, and eating junk food all day living it up on government assistance.

Idk how many times it has to be said that this welfare queen image you have is not real. It was made up to manipulate you. The Nixon and Reagan administration's are on record admitting they made it up.

There are no people on SNAP who don’t want to work, buy or rent a stable home, better themselves, etc. They are desperate for it in fact.

They have all, along with their kids, simply fallen on hard times or there are no suitable jobs available to them in their area. That’s all.

So, NBC4 DC just did a story on people on SNAP considering giving up their pets. One woman interviewed estimated she spends nearly $400 on her dog. Seriously?

I feel sorry for those who really need these benefits but something is terribly wrong when people on SNAP can afford to take on the expense of pets when you consider food, worming, flea meds, yearly vaccinations & care in case something goes wrong.

People have physical and emotional needs. Being poor sucks and it's lonely and isolating. Many poor people have pets for various reasons, including for their emotional health. Why do you begrudge these people any speck of happiness they may have?

No sodas, no candy, no chips, no TV, no cell phones, no car, no self care, no kids, no pets. They should just work, eat rice and beans in the dark, and die.

I am not rich, but I am I guess middle class and a pet is really not in my budget right now. So we don’t have one. I would also love a weekly massage for self care, but I can’t afford it. Why should I subsidize someone else having a pet??

You aren't. You pay taxes to be part of our society. You don't have a pet because you've chosen to prioritize other things. Do you honestly want to trade places with the person on SNAP whose pound puppy is the only source of love and companionship they have? You people are like toddlers, whining about the little bit someone has, when you already have everything you need.

DP

So I disagree with this perspective completely and I'm a liberal and have a lot of sympathy for those less fortunate. I donate all the time. I'm for universal healthcare and believe in contributing to the whole of society in making my community a healthy and happy one.

However..

There is such a thing called decision making and some are better than others in this skill set. So I get that everyone wants to feel loved and appreciated and love animals but if I'm on SNAP, my first priority should NOT be relying on SNAP till the end of time! At some point I'm responsible for my own needs. If I need help that's one thing, if I am simply making decisions to make my self feel good and use govt funds to sustain myself then I'm failing at prioritizing correctly and at decision making in general.

I fear many have an inherent prob with SNAP because so many abuse their privileges. When you have a public system in a Democracy as rich as ours, people are going to mess up a lot and waste a lot of safety nets financially. It's a different culture elsewhere but there is such a streak of entitlement culturally here that I'm not sure SNAP should not be completely overhauled.

I believe some will impact tragically without SNAP but a lot will be just fine. Thankfully many states are able to provide. We really do have a prob in US of inequality but also of waste and useless govt overreach - not everything is right with govt even as I disagree with Trump and Rep approach in managing govt functionality.

here's a list from a group serving people with limited ability to cook who also rely on SNAP. It's all highly processed cheap food. This is the reality for alot of people.

Shelf-stable milk cartons (chocolate preferred)‬
‭Individual Cup of Noodles (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Individual Mac & Cheese cups (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Cheese or peanut butter cracker packs‬
‭Fruit cups (100% juice preferred)‬
‭Bars (granola, fruit, cereal, breakfast, protein)‬
‭Individual cups of instant oatmeal‬
‭Individual cups of cereal‬
‭100% juice boxes/pouches (no glass bottles; no soft drinks)‬
‭Prego Ready Meals, Barilla pasta entrees, Hormel Compleats‬
Chicken or tuna snack packs with crackers‬
Packets of trail mix or nuts‬
Individual beef sticks/beef jerky‬

I grew up blue collar/working class and we ate a lot of this (not necessarily the individual packs because those cost more, but still) plus hamburger helper, progresso, campbells and honestly it was fine. I’m thankful to not need to rely on these sorts of foods any more but it also doesn’t bother me to occasionally serve my kids instant oatmeal or boxed mac and cheese or tuna.

Same. People on this thread would ban most of this.

They want people to buy potatoes and cook dried beans. Food banks like potatoes but they don’t like dried beans because their clients don’t know what to do with them.

They also don’t like hamburger helper because it needs meat and they don’t like boxed Mac and cheese because it needs milk and butter.

They want cans with pop lids because clients don’t have can openers and they need easy to open things for people with dexterity issues like the elderly.

99% of people on food stamps have kitchens, have jobs, and are capable of making food. You’re acting like everyone on food stamps is dead, blind, immobile and living in a tree stump

Care to cite the source for this statistic?

According to USDA, 70% have full time employment. The remaining 30% are retirees and the disabled.

That doesn’t support 99% of people on snap have kitchens. Give us a cite for that.

There are a few million people living in cars and motel rooms. More than a million and half kids in were homeless as of 2018 and probably more now.

There are elderly and disabled people who have mobility and dexterity issues even if they have kitchens.

That’s why food banks request lots of easy to eat crap.

These people deserve to eat too.

Most retirees have refrigerators and microwaves, at least. As do the 70% of people working full time. And “disabled” is a very vague term that encompasses many abilities. Disabled people capable of living in independently can cook simple meals.

According to government data. 99.8% of US households have a fridge, 95% have a microwave, and 99.7% have either a cooktop, stove or range.

By definition, this excludes the homeless. Who are more likely to be on SNAP.

Of which there are about 780,000. No where near the millions claimed earlier.

https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2025/who-is-homeless-in-the-united-states-a-2025-update

Again they deserve to eat too. And I don’t buy the BS that you are magically ok with them getting to drink soda and eat fast food on the taxpayer dime if you begrudge them cup noodles.

Who said they didn't? Stop projecting your assumptions onto other people.

The person who sold there were millions is the person you should have a problem with.

[Anonymous]

Only American Citizens deserve to eat on the taxpayers dime. Illegals can search the garbage can or self deport and eat at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Only American Citizens deserve to eat on the taxpayers dime. Illegals can search the garbage can or self deport and eat at home.

People here illegally do not get snap benefits. That is already the law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only American Citizens deserve to eat on the taxpayers dime. Illegals can search the garbage can or self deport and eat at home.

People here illegally do not get snap benefits. That is already the law

Democrats don’t follow the law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7 of those are crap. Candy? JFC, I never got candy as a kid and my parents were loaded.

And 13 things are regular staples. I’d be fine blocking candy and soft drinks from purchases. I don’t have a problem with frozen novelties or snacks or cookies.

You should care. 24% of low income kids are obese, not just overweight, but obese. Compared to 10% obesity rate of kids not low income. It’s because they are and they are over consuming junk food, by a lot. Snap is given specifically to buy heathy foods and it’s being used to purchase junk.

This is an old article. Obesity rate has increased from 20% to 24% since 2015

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2015/december/gap-in-obesity-rates-between-low-and-high-income-children-widens-with-age

This thread is about SNAP being cut off. Can you stop? Do you think people should starve because they aren't buying food you approve?

You think people consuming 200% of the calories their body needs are at risk for starving?

Fat people still have to eat, and yes they can starve. What is wrong with you?

Of course, but less food. You think people receiving snap can buy zero food at all without snap?

And they be even more likely to buy crap food because it is cheap! They’re not going to buy ground beef or milk like they do now.

They’re going to buy ramen packs and other cheap crap.

There are many, many heathy options that are cheap, if not cheaper than junk. People buy the junk because of convenience and preference, not price.

Yep, this. We’ve gone over and over this. A 10 pound bag of potatoes is $5 at Aldi. Loaded Baked potatoes make a great meal, and you can make a ton of other sides. Or potato soup. These are all things I eat btw. Dry beans and rice are cheap. You can make all kind of meals with that and various fixing. A family pack of chicken thighs is $6 at Aldi. A pork roast is around 12 and makes a ton of meat.

And how should a family living out of their car prepare those things? Or maybe in a motel room with just a microwave? Do you have any idea how many thousands of people are in exactly those circumstance or that car living is on the rise in America?

It's willful ignorance. They want to believe people on SNAP don't work, sit around in their free apartments, playing on their Obama phones, popping out kids, paying for manicures and tattoos, and eating junk food all day living it up on government assistance.

Idk how many times it has to be said that this welfare queen image you have is not real. It was made up to manipulate you. The Nixon and Reagan administration's are on record admitting they made it up.

There are no people on SNAP who don’t want to work, buy or rent a stable home, better themselves, etc. They are desperate for it in fact.

They have all, along with their kids, simply fallen on hard times or there are no suitable jobs available to them in their area. That’s all.

So, NBC4 DC just did a story on people on SNAP considering giving up their pets. One woman interviewed estimated she spends nearly $400 on her dog. Seriously?

I feel sorry for those who really need these benefits but something is terribly wrong when people on SNAP can afford to take on the expense of pets when you consider food, worming, flea meds, yearly vaccinations & care in case something goes wrong.

People have physical and emotional needs. Being poor sucks and it's lonely and isolating. Many poor people have pets for various reasons, including for their emotional health. Why do you begrudge these people any speck of happiness they may have?

No sodas, no candy, no chips, no TV, no cell phones, no car, no self care, no kids, no pets. They should just work, eat rice and beans in the dark, and die.

I am not rich, but I am I guess middle class and a pet is really not in my budget right now. So we don’t have one. I would also love a weekly massage for self care, but I can’t afford it. Why should I subsidize someone else having a pet??

You aren't. You pay taxes to be part of our society. You don't have a pet because you've chosen to prioritize other things. Do you honestly want to trade places with the person on SNAP whose pound puppy is the only source of love and companionship they have? You people are like toddlers, whining about the little bit someone has, when you already have everything you need.

DP

So I disagree with this perspective completely and I'm a liberal and have a lot of sympathy for those less fortunate. I donate all the time. I'm for universal healthcare and believe in contributing to the whole of society in making my community a healthy and happy one.

However..

There is such a thing called decision making and some are better than others in this skill set. So I get that everyone wants to feel loved and appreciated and love animals but if I'm on SNAP, my first priority should NOT be relying on SNAP till the end of time! At some point I'm responsible for my own needs. If I need help that's one thing, if I am simply making decisions to make my self feel good and use govt funds to sustain myself then I'm failing at prioritizing correctly and at decision making in general.

I fear many have an inherent prob with SNAP because so many abuse their privileges. When you have a public system in a Democracy as rich as ours, people are going to mess up a lot and waste a lot of safety nets financially. It's a different culture elsewhere but there is such a streak of entitlement culturally here that I'm not sure SNAP should not be completely overhauled.

I believe some will impact tragically without SNAP but a lot will be just fine. Thankfully many states are able to provide. We really do have a prob in US of inequality but also of waste and useless govt overreach - not everything is right with govt even as I disagree with Trump and Rep approach in managing govt functionality.

here's a list from a group serving people with limited ability to cook who also rely on SNAP. It's all highly processed cheap food. This is the reality for alot of people.

Shelf-stable milk cartons (chocolate preferred)‬
‭Individual Cup of Noodles (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Individual Mac & Cheese cups (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Cheese or peanut butter cracker packs‬
‭Fruit cups (100% juice preferred)‬
‭Bars (granola, fruit, cereal, breakfast, protein)‬
‭Individual cups of instant oatmeal‬
‭Individual cups of cereal‬
‭100% juice boxes/pouches (no glass bottles; no soft drinks)‬
‭Prego Ready Meals, Barilla pasta entrees, Hormel Compleats‬
Chicken or tuna snack packs with crackers‬
Packets of trail mix or nuts‬
Individual beef sticks/beef jerky‬

I grew up blue collar/working class and we ate a lot of this (not necessarily the individual packs because those cost more, but still) plus hamburger helper, progresso, campbells and honestly it was fine. I’m thankful to not need to rely on these sorts of foods any more but it also doesn’t bother me to occasionally serve my kids instant oatmeal or boxed mac and cheese or tuna.

Same. People on this thread would ban most of this.

They want people to buy potatoes and cook dried beans. Food banks like potatoes but they don’t like dried beans because their clients don’t know what to do with them.

They also don’t like hamburger helper because it needs meat and they don’t like boxed Mac and cheese because it needs milk and butter.

They want cans with pop lids because clients don’t have can openers and they need easy to open things for people with dexterity issues like the elderly.

99% of people on food stamps have kitchens, have jobs, and are capable of making food. You’re acting like everyone on food stamps is dead, blind, immobile and living in a tree stump

Care to cite the source for this statistic?

According to USDA, 70% have full time employment. The remaining 30% are retirees and the disabled.

That doesn’t support 99% of people on snap have kitchens. Give us a cite for that.

There are a few million people living in cars and motel rooms. More than a million and half kids in were homeless as of 2018 and probably more now.

There are elderly and disabled people who have mobility and dexterity issues even if they have kitchens.

That’s why food banks request lots of easy to eat crap.

These people deserve to eat too.

Most retirees have refrigerators and microwaves, at least. As do the 70% of people working full time. And “disabled” is a very vague term that encompasses many abilities. Disabled people capable of living in independently can cook simple meals.

According to government data. 99.8% of US households have a fridge, 95% have a microwave, and 99.7% have either a cooktop, stove or range.

By definition, this excludes the homeless. Who are more likely to be on SNAP.

Of which there are about 780,000. No where near the millions claimed earlier.

https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2025/who-is-homeless-in-the-united-states-a-2025-update

Again they deserve to eat too. And I don’t buy the BS that you are magically ok with them getting to drink soda and eat fast food on the taxpayer dime if you begrudge them cup noodles.

Typical Republicans. They begrudge a struggling single mom getting some packs of instant Ramen noodles but have NO PROBLEM with billionaires buying 14 year old girls for their private islands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only American Citizens deserve to eat on the taxpayers dime. Illegals can search the garbage can or self deport and eat at home.

People here illegally do not get snap benefits. That is already the law

Democrats don’t follow the law

Cis was involved in the creation of project 2025

Stop posting trash

You have any actual gov. Data?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only American Citizens deserve to eat on the taxpayers dime. Illegals can search the garbage can or self deport and eat at home.

People here illegally do not get snap benefits. That is already the law

Democrats don’t follow the law

This is from a 2021 CIS study which was heavily criticized - it made a lot of assumptions and estimations in calculating "undocumented" - CIS is known to be heavily anti-immigrant.

CATO Institute did a much more recent analysis https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2025-02/Briefing-Paper-184.pdf and has some very different conclusions, that illegal aliens are consuming significantly less benefits than what CIS claims, that at most they only consume around 3.5% of welfare and other entitlement benefits.

And even if it were true, since 2021 there have been numerous policy shifts that tightened access to benefits, such as HHS redefining programs adding 13 additional programs to the restricted list, the OBBB Act, which modified access to SNAP, Medicaid, and housing, and EOs which also tightened access. Not to mention, isn't the Trump administration touting how many illegals they've deported? So how can they be both deported AND consuming all these benefits? Schoedinger's illegal alien?

As usual, MAGA doesn't do any cross checking of information or any critical thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7 of those are crap. Candy? JFC, I never got candy as a kid and my parents were loaded.

And 13 things are regular staples. I’d be fine blocking candy and soft drinks from purchases. I don’t have a problem with frozen novelties or snacks or cookies.

You should care. 24% of low income kids are obese, not just overweight, but obese. Compared to 10% obesity rate of kids not low income. It’s because they are and they are over consuming junk food, by a lot. Snap is given specifically to buy heathy foods and it’s being used to purchase junk.

This is an old article. Obesity rate has increased from 20% to 24% since 2015

https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2015/december/gap-in-obesity-rates-between-low-and-high-income-children-widens-with-age

This thread is about SNAP being cut off. Can you stop? Do you think people should starve because they aren't buying food you approve?

You think people consuming 200% of the calories their body needs are at risk for starving?

Fat people still have to eat, and yes they can starve. What is wrong with you?

Of course, but less food. You think people receiving snap can buy zero food at all without snap?

And they be even more likely to buy crap food because it is cheap! They’re not going to buy ground beef or milk like they do now.

They’re going to buy ramen packs and other cheap crap.

There are many, many heathy options that are cheap, if not cheaper than junk. People buy the junk because of convenience and preference, not price.

Yep, this. We’ve gone over and over this. A 10 pound bag of potatoes is $5 at Aldi. Loaded Baked potatoes make a great meal, and you can make a ton of other sides. Or potato soup. These are all things I eat btw. Dry beans and rice are cheap. You can make all kind of meals with that and various fixing. A family pack of chicken thighs is $6 at Aldi. A pork roast is around 12 and makes a ton of meat.

And how should a family living out of their car prepare those things? Or maybe in a motel room with just a microwave? Do you have any idea how many thousands of people are in exactly those circumstance or that car living is on the rise in America?

It's willful ignorance. They want to believe people on SNAP don't work, sit around in their free apartments, playing on their Obama phones, popping out kids, paying for manicures and tattoos, and eating junk food all day living it up on government assistance.

Idk how many times it has to be said that this welfare queen image you have is not real. It was made up to manipulate you. The Nixon and Reagan administration's are on record admitting they made it up.

There are no people on SNAP who don’t want to work, buy or rent a stable home, better themselves, etc. They are desperate for it in fact.

They have all, along with their kids, simply fallen on hard times or there are no suitable jobs available to them in their area. That’s all.

So, NBC4 DC just did a story on people on SNAP considering giving up their pets. One woman interviewed estimated she spends nearly $400 on her dog. Seriously?

I feel sorry for those who really need these benefits but something is terribly wrong when people on SNAP can afford to take on the expense of pets when you consider food, worming, flea meds, yearly vaccinations & care in case something goes wrong.

People have physical and emotional needs. Being poor sucks and it's lonely and isolating. Many poor people have pets for various reasons, including for their emotional health. Why do you begrudge these people any speck of happiness they may have?

No sodas, no candy, no chips, no TV, no cell phones, no car, no self care, no kids, no pets. They should just work, eat rice and beans in the dark, and die.

I am not rich, but I am I guess middle class and a pet is really not in my budget right now. So we don’t have one. I would also love a weekly massage for self care, but I can’t afford it. Why should I subsidize someone else having a pet??

You aren't. You pay taxes to be part of our society. You don't have a pet because you've chosen to prioritize other things. Do you honestly want to trade places with the person on SNAP whose pound puppy is the only source of love and companionship they have? You people are like toddlers, whining about the little bit someone has, when you already have everything you need.

DP

So I disagree with this perspective completely and I'm a liberal and have a lot of sympathy for those less fortunate. I donate all the time. I'm for universal healthcare and believe in contributing to the whole of society in making my community a healthy and happy one.

However..

There is such a thing called decision making and some are better than others in this skill set. So I get that everyone wants to feel loved and appreciated and love animals but if I'm on SNAP, my first priority should NOT be relying on SNAP till the end of time! At some point I'm responsible for my own needs. If I need help that's one thing, if I am simply making decisions to make my self feel good and use govt funds to sustain myself then I'm failing at prioritizing correctly and at decision making in general.

I fear many have an inherent prob with SNAP because so many abuse their privileges. When you have a public system in a Democracy as rich as ours, people are going to mess up a lot and waste a lot of safety nets financially. It's a different culture elsewhere but there is such a streak of entitlement culturally here that I'm not sure SNAP should not be completely overhauled.

I believe some will impact tragically without SNAP but a lot will be just fine. Thankfully many states are able to provide. We really do have a prob in US of inequality but also of waste and useless govt overreach - not everything is right with govt even as I disagree with Trump and Rep approach in managing govt functionality.

here's a list from a group serving people with limited ability to cook who also rely on SNAP. It's all highly processed cheap food. This is the reality for alot of people.

Shelf-stable milk cartons (chocolate preferred)‬
‭Individual Cup of Noodles (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Individual Mac & Cheese cups (water is only added ingredient)‬
‭Cheese or peanut butter cracker packs‬
‭Fruit cups (100% juice preferred)‬
‭Bars (granola, fruit, cereal, breakfast, protein)‬
‭Individual cups of instant oatmeal‬
‭Individual cups of cereal‬
‭100% juice boxes/pouches (no glass bottles; no soft drinks)‬
‭Prego Ready Meals, Barilla pasta entrees, Hormel Compleats‬
Chicken or tuna snack packs with crackers‬
Packets of trail mix or nuts‬
Individual beef sticks/beef jerky‬

I grew up blue collar/working class and we ate a lot of this (not necessarily the individual packs because those cost more, but still) plus hamburger helper, progresso, campbells and honestly it was fine. I’m thankful to not need to rely on these sorts of foods any more but it also doesn’t bother me to occasionally serve my kids instant oatmeal or boxed mac and cheese or tuna.

Same. People on this thread would ban most of this.

They want people to buy potatoes and cook dried beans. Food banks like potatoes but they don’t like dried beans because their clients don’t know what to do with them.

They also don’t like hamburger helper because it needs meat and they don’t like boxed Mac and cheese because it needs milk and butter.

They want cans with pop lids because clients don’t have can openers and they need easy to open things for people with dexterity issues like the elderly.

99% of people on food stamps have kitchens, have jobs, and are capable of making food. You’re acting like everyone on food stamps is dead, blind, immobile and living in a tree stump

Care to cite the source for this statistic?

According to USDA, 70% have full time employment. The remaining 30% are retirees and the disabled.

That doesn’t support 99% of people on snap have kitchens. Give us a cite for that.

There are a few million people living in cars and motel rooms. More than a million and half kids in were homeless as of 2018 and probably more now.

There are elderly and disabled people who have mobility and dexterity issues even if they have kitchens.

That’s why food banks request lots of easy to eat crap.

These people deserve to eat too.

Most retirees have refrigerators and microwaves, at least. As do the 70% of people working full time. And “disabled” is a very vague term that encompasses many abilities. Disabled people capable of living in independently can cook simple meals.

According to government data. 99.8% of US households have a fridge, 95% have a microwave, and 99.7% have either a cooktop, stove or range.

By definition, this excludes the homeless. Who are more likely to be on SNAP.

Of which there are about 780,000. No where near the millions claimed earlier.

https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2025/who-is-homeless-in-the-united-states-a-2025-update

Again they deserve to eat too. And I don’t buy the BS that you are magically ok with them getting to drink soda and eat fast food on the taxpayer dime if you begrudge them cup noodles.

Typical Republicans. They begrudge a struggling single mom getting some packs of instant Ramen noodles but have NO PROBLEM with billionaires buying 14 year old girls for their private islands.

This.