So what happens when the Federal government can’t issue Nov Food Stamps?

Anonymous
Any unrest because people are hungry and desperate will be videoed, edited, and pundits will say it's Antifa and 30% of the country will believe it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Wake up, Republicans. This shit ain't a good look.


You are aware that the ballroom was privately funded, right? Private funds means no taxpayer money. You cannot expect them to divert funds donated to the ballroom, and redistribute the money to random Americans.

Was the east wing that they ripped down also privately funded?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They'll have to get a job. Stop mooching.


Actually, most people I know who use this already have jobs. Walmart doesn't pay well, and their employees are some of the largest users of social services benefits.

There will just be more theft of food.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They'll have to get a job. Stop mooching.



People on food stamps largely have jobs (others are retired, or students, or disabled). Remember Wal-mart hands out forms for food stamps to employees because their jobs don’t pay enough to live.


It will mostly be red states rubes, so the joke’s about on them.


Yes, let's go with this! Let's cut food stamps and stick it to red states.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Any unrest because people are hungry and desperate will be videoed, edited, and pundits will say it's Antifa and 30% of the country will believe it.


I don’t think so, maybe people living in wealthy areas, but people connected to the working class and living in low income neighborhoods are going to know that something is wrong quite quickly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They'll have to get a job. Stop mooching.


Actually, most people I know who use this already have jobs. Walmart doesn't pay well, and their employees are some of the largest users of social services benefits.

There will just be more theft of food.


And the cost of this is going to be passed right back to the paying consumers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They'll have to get a job. Stop mooching.



People on food stamps largely have jobs (others are retired, or students, or disabled). Remember Wal-mart hands out forms for food stamps to employees because their jobs don’t pay enough to live.


It will mostly be red states rubes, so the joke’s about on them.

Well then maybe it’s for the best because maybe MAGA will see what they are voting for.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Wake up, Republicans. This shit ain't a good look.


You are aware that the ballroom was privately funded, right? Private funds means no taxpayer money. You cannot expect them to divert funds donated to the ballroom, and redistribute the money to random Americans.


Nope. Trump himself said it would be funded “in part” by donors. The rest will be taxpayers, just like the airplane he plans to keep for himself. Trump has also said that he now expects the cost of the ballroom will be about $300 million.

The optics are terrible though and Trump may be immune, but the GOP is not.


I’ve been told that donations will be tax deductible. Also, Trump is suing the DOJ for 230 million dollars — which he supposedly will use for the ballroom if he wins. ( Since he’s now the boss of the DOJ, there’s a good chance that he’ll win, no?)

Either way, the financing will depend on taxpayer dollars.
Anonymous
Farmers benefit from the SNAP program. So they will lose on this too.

FAFO.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Any unrest because people are hungry and desperate will be videoed, edited, and pundits will say it's Antifa and 30% of the country will believe it.

I worry about this.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Wake up, Republicans. This shit ain't a good look.


You are aware that the ballroom was privately funded, right? Private funds means no taxpayer money. You cannot expect them to divert funds donated to the ballroom, and redistribute the money to random Americans.


Yes. Let them eat cake.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Any unrest because people are hungry and desperate will be videoed, edited, and pundits will say it's Antifa and 30% of the country will believe it.

I worry about this.



That won’t work because a good amount of conservatives are also on food stamps.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Food Stamps (SNAP benefits) can’t be paid out if Congress does not appropriate funds for November.

What will happen if 40+ million people don’t get food stamps about 10 days from now? Total monthly benefits are just under $8 billlion.


People will starve because of Epstein and the men who wanted to __ little girls.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They'll have to get a job. Stop mooching.


Tell me how a senior who poops their pants will get hired. And I don’t mean Trump even though he is a known pants pooper.



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Wake up, Republicans. This shit ain't a good look.


You are aware that the ballroom was privately funded, right? Private funds means no taxpayer money. You cannot expect them to divert funds donated to the ballroom, and redistribute the money to random Americans.


Bribes. Funded by bribes, I bet.

Yes, I can expect the money be used to feed people. Why not?

The people sending bribes DGAF about a ballroom or where the money goes. Get real.


post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: