I can't help it - I want a Neverfull.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how many people who bash the Neverfull own a Longchamp tote.

I am bashing it. I don’t even own a purse. Just a backpack and some reusable grocery bags I’ve had for over 15 years…

Well I don’t even have grocery bags. I just have an old worn sock that I carry my money and DL in. And I’ve had it for 20 years.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how many people who bash the Neverfull own a Longchamp tote.

I am bashing it. I don’t even own a purse. Just a backpack and some reusable grocery bags I’ve had for over 15 years…

Well I don’t even have grocery bags. I just have an old worn sock that I carry my money and DL in. And I’ve had it for 20 years.

Oh Dobby you don’t still need the sock!

[Anonymous]

After my parents finished paying for college, my mother bought an LV bag. After 25 years ish a piece broke. And we went to their flagship store and they replaced that bit with no charge. If the quality and customer service still stand it might turn out to be a good value.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For the haters… what’s an equally splurgey but still high quality alternative? Goyard fades. balenciaga has totes… what else?

Burberry
Saint Laurent
Prada

.. all have totes at that price point that are stylish without screaming a logo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the haters… what’s an equally splurgey but still high quality alternative? Goyard fades. balenciaga has totes… what else?

Burberry
Saint Laurent
Prada

.. all have totes at that price point that are stylish without screaming a logo.

Faure le Page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the haters… what’s an equally splurgey but still high quality alternative? Goyard fades. balenciaga has totes… what else?

Burberry
Saint Laurent
Prada

.. all have totes at that price point that are stylish without screaming a logo.

The tote linked by OP doesn’t scream a logo. It’s not the mono print.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the haters… what’s an equally splurgey but still high quality alternative? Goyard fades. balenciaga has totes… what else?

Burberry
Saint Laurent
Prada

.. all have totes at that price point that are stylish without screaming a logo.

Are any of these as durable? I’ve never owned any of the above but I keep hearing the neverfull holds up better than anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the haters… what’s an equally splurgey but still high quality alternative? Goyard fades. balenciaga has totes… what else?

Burberry
Saint Laurent
Prada

.. all have totes at that price point that are stylish without screaming a logo.

Faure le Page

The Saint Laurent tote is leather and nice, but not durable. I can’t comment on the others/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can afford a $2000 bag but that doesn't mean I'd buy a Neverfull with it. Personally, I'm eyeing one of these for when I have to head back into the office.

Bottega? Those are gorgeous.

PP here, yup, my favorite!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how many people who bash the Neverfull own a Longchamp tote.

Bottega poster here. I had a Longchamp Le Pliage when I was about 25, and it's really not my taste anymore. Also, doesn't even compare, it's what, $150? I don't even remember, I bought mine in the airport in Paris, LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the haters… what’s an equally splurgey but still high quality alternative? Goyard fades. balenciaga has totes… what else?

Burberry
Saint Laurent
Prada

.. all have totes at that price point that are stylish without screaming a logo.

The tote linked by OP doesn’t scream a logo. It’s not the mono print.

I’m not a neverfull hater but, c’mon, that print is so well known it is pretty much a logo at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how many people who bash the Neverfull own a Longchamp tote.

Bottega poster here. I had a Longchamp Le Pliage when I was about 25, and it's really not my taste anymore. Also, doesn't even compare, it's what, $150? I don't even remember, I bought mine in the airport in Paris, LOL.

I think that’s what pp is saying; an owner of the equally basic but much cheaper longchamp can’t really knock its luxury counterpart.

[Anonymous]

It's the "mommy and daddy bought me this for my first job" tote to me so at 35 I think it would look desperate to the young 'uns I manage and like I was trying to look younger than I am, but if it fits with your style and you like it, go for it. I won't criticize the price, we like what we like and deserve to treat ourselves (reasonably) whatever we think that looks like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's the "mommy and daddy bought me this for my first job" tote to me so at 35 I think it would look desperate to the young 'uns I manage and like I was trying to look younger than I am, but if it fits with your style and you like it, go for it. I won't criticize the price, we like what we like and deserve to treat ourselves (reasonably) whatever we think that looks like.

Interesting. Where I live it’s very much the soccer mom bag, not something a younger woman in her early 20s would wear.