This proposal is not unreasonable. Middle school - fully open. High school - fully open. PK-2nd - fully open. 3rd-5th - virtual is an option until a vaccine is available, which will help to keep the school population low to make it safer for PK-2nd. After vaccine for this age group is available - fully open. |
absolutely not. go cower in the basement. My 4th grader needs to be in school and I would 100% file a lawsuit against this plan. |
Yes, it is unreasonable to subject elementary schoolers of any grade to any more DL. Enough. They need school. Rising 3rd graders were second graders last year, and missed that important year of social growth and learning. They cannot take another year of this. Nor can anyone else. |
If your 4th grader wants in person, opt for in person. What would you be suing for? Let folks with kids in 3rd-5th who have concerns about delta do virtual up until a vaccine is available. |
This is a joke, right? |
Who is saying a year? |
DP. And who do you envision would be teaching them? You already have the option to enroll in virtual, although it may not be (hopefully won’t be) provided by your IB school. |
It will be nearly a year until the vaccine is available and kids are fully vaccinated. |
Who is saying this??? |
Virtual is already an option. And I doubt it will keep the school population low, at least not at schools with a lot of UMC families, because they understand that kids need real school. |
FDA recently said they want until mid winter to decide on EUA. |
DCPS’s fundamental purpose is a jobs program. Educating children, to the extent it happens, is just an incidental byproduct. |
That's more than a bit mean. I don't agree at all. DCPS actually does decent work for kids who need a lot of help. |
So you meant kids cannot take the rest of 2021 off because September to January or February will not be a whole year of remote learning. |
Yes, but their special snowflake is the only one that matters, so they don't care about other kids. |