Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is back in the states with his baby and expecting wife. I find it interesting how Harpers Bazaar emphasizes he's 'safe' in the first line.

The U.S. has Harry's back and I'm thinking more than a few people were worried something would 'mysteriously' happen to the Prince while in the UK.

The person who has Harry's back is his father and his dead mum. That's where the money comes from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is back in the states with his baby and expecting wife. I find it interesting how Harpers Bazaar emphasizes he's 'safe' in the first line.

The U.S. has Harry's back and I'm thinking more than a few people were worried something would 'mysteriously' happen to the Prince while in the UK.

You sound overly dramatic. What was going to befall Harry in the UK?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is back in the states with his baby and expecting wife. I find it interesting how Harpers Bazaar emphasizes he's 'safe' in the first line.

The U.S. has Harry's back and I'm thinking more than a few people were worried something would 'mysteriously' happen to the Prince while in the UK.

The person who has Harry's back is his father and his dead mum. That's where the money comes from.

You’re correct on Diana. Charles not so much - cutting someone’s security when you’re sitting on a billion-dollar Duchy which you’ve controlled for 50-years is not having your son’s back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

+1

I have worked in PR and this was obvious orchestrated by Meghan's PR camp to send a message to the BRF.

It clearly also speaks to her grand delusions and self importance. The BRF wasn't nice to Megs so they will be obliterated?

Images from Will and Kate's wedding below:






Yep. The British are clearly a people who want their royal family toppled because a D list American actress is annoyed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

Sorry you married a toad, or thinks that your husband is a toad. George Clooney is one man. He is special to his wife and obviously you, but not everyone thinks he is the be all to end all. I would never denigrate my husband as not worthy to GC, or any other man. Damn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince Harry is back in the states with his baby and expecting wife. I find it interesting how Harpers Bazaar emphasizes he's 'safe' in the first line.

The U.S. has Harry's back and I'm thinking more than a few people were worried something would 'mysteriously' happen to the Prince while in the UK.

The person who has Harry's back is his father and his dead mum. That's where the money comes from.

You’re correct on Diana. Charles not so much - cutting someone’s security when you’re sitting on a billion-dollar Duchy which you’ve controlled for 50-years is not having your son’s back.

Didn’t Harry and Meghan make tens of millions of dollars since Megxit ? They wanted to be independent, why can’t they pay for their own security instead of mooching off dad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

Sorry you married a toad, or thinks that your husband is a toad. George Clooney is one man. He is special to his wife and obviously you, but not everyone thinks he is the be all to end all. I would never denigrate my husband as not worthy to GC, or any other man. Damn.

Seriously. These people are something else.

I've worked in PR and currently work for comms for a F500. The idea that this was somehow written up by Meghan's team and sent to VF is bizarre wishful thinking. It's also deeply offensive to the woman who wrote this story, Michelle Ruiz. Camilla Tominey, this isn't.

I put the Meghan conspiracy nuts on the same level as flat-earthers. Truly strange strain of obsessive illogic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

Sorry you married a toad, or thinks that your husband is a toad. George Clooney is one man. He is special to his wife and obviously you, but not everyone thinks he is the be all to end all. I would never denigrate my husband as not worthy to GC, or any other man. Damn.

Seriously. These people are something else.

I've worked in PR and currently work for comms for a F500. The idea that this was somehow written up by Meghan's team and sent to VF is bizarre wishful thinking. It's also deeply offensive to the woman who wrote this story, Michelle Ruiz. Camilla Tominey, this isn't.

I put the Meghan conspiracy nuts on the same level as flat-earthers. Truly strange strain of obsessive illogic.

Insulting your own husband to stick it to Meghan!

It's like the meme about "owning the libs" -- these people will do absolutely anything just to prove a point, even if it means harming themselves.

Very clever lot, uh huh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

Sorry you married a toad, or thinks that your husband is a toad. George Clooney is one man. He is special to his wife and obviously you, but not everyone thinks he is the be all to end all. I would never denigrate my husband as not worthy to GC, or any other man. Damn.

Seriously. These people are something else.

I've worked in PR and currently work for comms for a F500. The idea that this was somehow written up by Meghan's team and sent to VF is bizarre wishful thinking. It's also deeply offensive to the woman who wrote this story, Michelle Ruiz. Camilla Tominey, this isn't.

I put the Meghan conspiracy nuts on the same level as flat-earthers. Truly strange strain of obsessive illogic.

you are ill-informed. this Vanity Fair article was snarky and agenda driven - written with the full cooperation of the sussex team. the quotes are cherry picked, there are the same little digs at Kate and the same crap sources (for ex: Anna Pasternak, Jessica Mulroneys sister in law.

the saddest part about all this is they knew Prince Phillip was dying - but needed to get their side out SO badly that they trashed the institution he spent his whole life serving. Again, this is the person who threw a tantrum because she couldnt wear the exact tiara she wanted. my sympathy for her is nil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Seriously. These people are something else.

I've worked in PR and currently work for comms for a F500. The idea that this was somehow written up by Meghan's team and sent to VF is bizarre wishful thinking. It's also deeply offensive to the woman who wrote this story, Michelle Ruiz. Camilla Tominey, this isn't.

I put the Meghan conspiracy nuts on the same level as flat-earthers. Truly strange strain of obsessive illogic.

LOL you say you work in PR yet you seem to be utterly unaware of how articles are pitched, sourced and quoted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

Sorry you married a toad, or thinks that your husband is a toad. George Clooney is one man. He is special to his wife and obviously you, but not everyone thinks he is the be all to end all. I would never denigrate my husband as not worthy to GC, or any other man. Damn.

OK. So you're saying she declined major blockbuster parts to work in international development?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

Sorry you married a toad, or thinks that your husband is a toad. George Clooney is one man. He is special to his wife and obviously you, but not everyone thinks he is the be all to end all. I would never denigrate my husband as not worthy to GC, or any other man. Damn.

This, children, is a good example of someone not understanding metaphors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Meghan's old interview with Craig Ferguson. What a lovely, smart woman!
The issue with the BRF is that they are all uneducated hicks, in essence, certainly have they have no clue about CRT or what racism is today. They are all like your old gramps or uncle who "are not racist, they just see it for what it is!" And what it is is a bunch of Black people not knowing their place!
Sadly, most of dcum is also nothing but a bunch of hicks, who are so racist but think they are "just seeing it for what it is!"

+1. There’s a lot of trash on here who identify with the brf.

The BRF is more relatable than Otumfuo Osei Tutu II of Ghana or King Mohammed VI.

[Anonymous]

harry is a bit of a plonker these days

the money from Diana - where do you think that came from...? Her divorce settlement from Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:harry is a bit of a plonker these days

the money from Diana - where do you think that came from...? Her divorce settlement from Charles.

You think he willing gave that up? Charles was furious. He wanted to do to Diana what Andrew did to Fergie - give her $1 million and a kick out the door. He couldn't.

Though he tried. There's a quote that in the last year of their divorce, Charles came to see Diana on her birthday and Diana asked 'What do you want now? The chairs?'

In other words - you've stripped me of my security, HRH, finances etc - now what?

At least he's consistent.