Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Meghan's old interview with Craig Ferguson. What a lovely, smart woman!
The issue with the BRF is that they are all uneducated hicks, in essence, certainly have they have no clue about CRT or what racism is today. They are all like your old gramps or uncle who "are not racist, they just see it for what it is!" And what it is is a bunch of Black people not knowing their place!
Sadly, most of dcum is also nothing but a bunch of hicks, who are so racist but think they are "just seeing it for what it is!"

+1. There’s a lot of trash on here who identify with the brf.

The BRF is more relatable than Otumfuo Osei Tutu II of Ghana or King Mohammed VI.

Its not that they're the most relatable. Its that Americans are un(der)educated and the only language you need to understand to get the scandals of the BRF is English.

The few-and-the-proud remaining other monarchies require Spanish, Swedish, Norwegian, French (Monégasque), Japanese, Arabic, Thai, or Twi.

The British royals are simultaneously the most visible and the easiest understood - you can blame that on their colonization tactics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

+1

I have worked in PR and this was obvious orchestrated by Meghan's PR camp to send a message to the BRF.

It clearly also speaks to her grand delusions and self importance. The BRF wasn't nice to Megs so they will be obliterated?

Yep. The British are clearly a people who want their royal family toppled because a D list American actress is annoyed.

Seems like they are pretty unmoved by them. A consort of 70 years died and people are mad their programs were interrupted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Meghan's old interview with Craig Ferguson. What a lovely, smart woman!
The issue with the BRF is that they are all uneducated hicks, in essence, certainly have they have no clue about CRT or what racism is today. They are all like your old gramps or uncle who "are not racist, they just see it for what it is!" And what it is is a bunch of Black people not knowing their place!
Sadly, most of dcum is also nothing but a bunch of hicks, who are so racist but think they are "just seeing it for what it is!"

+1. There’s a lot of trash on here who identify with the brf.

The BRF is more relatable than Otumfuo Osei Tutu II of Ghana or King Mohammed VI.

Its not that they're the most relatable. Its that Americans are un(der)educated and the only language you need to understand to get the scandals of the BRF is English.

The few-and-the-proud remaining other monarchies require Spanish, Swedish, Norwegian, French (Monégasque), Japanese, Arabic, Thai, or Twi.

The British royals are simultaneously the most visible and the easiest understood - you can blame that on their colonization tactics.

The current Thai king is a complete embarrassment to himself, his country and the memory of his late father.

[Anonymous]

She is toxic. He is a victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Meghan's old interview with Craig Ferguson. What a lovely, smart woman!
The issue with the BRF is that they are all uneducated hicks, in essence, certainly have they have no clue about CRT or what racism is today. They are all like your old gramps or uncle who "are not racist, they just see it for what it is!" And what it is is a bunch of Black people not knowing their place!
Sadly, most of dcum is also nothing but a bunch of hicks, who are so racist but think they are "just seeing it for what it is!"

+1. There’s a lot of trash on here who identify with the brf.

The BRF is more relatable than Otumfuo Osei Tutu II of Ghana or King Mohammed VI.

Its not that they're the most relatable. Its that Americans are un(der)educated and the only language you need to understand to get the scandals of the BRF is English.

The few-and-the-proud remaining other monarchies require Spanish, Swedish, Norwegian, French (Monégasque), Japanese, Arabic, Thai, or Twi.

The British royals are simultaneously the most visible and the easiest understood - you can blame that on their colonization tactics.

The current Thai king is a complete embarrassment to himself, his country and the memory of his late father.

Yep. I know. You think most of the American public is aware of that...or even where Thailand is frankly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is toxic. He is a victim.

What a brilliantly incisive, uniquely insightful, well supported, detailed comment!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is toxic. He is a victim.

What a brilliantly incisive, uniquely insightful, well supported, detailed comment!!!!!!

Hahahaha. +1

These people are way too invested and projecting their weird insecurities on this lady.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is toxic. He is a victim.

What a brilliantly incisive, uniquely insightful, well supported, detailed comment!!!!!!

Hahahaha. +1

These people are way too invested and projecting their weird insecurities on this lady.

Uh, you are posting here too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is toxic. He is a victim.

What a brilliantly incisive, uniquely insightful, well supported, detailed comment!!!!!!

Hahahaha. +1

These people are way too invested and projecting their weird insecurities on this lady.

Uh, you are posting here too.

You guys are entertaining. You have moved on from tearing down Britney Spears. Now it’s Meghan Markle. Gossip is the new blood sport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Meghan's old interview with Craig Ferguson. What a lovely, smart woman!
The issue with the BRF is that they are all uneducated hicks, in essence, certainly have they have no clue about CRT or what racism is today. They are all like your old gramps or uncle who "are not racist, they just see it for what it is!" And what it is is a bunch of Black people not knowing their place!
Sadly, most of dcum is also nothing but a bunch of hicks, who are so racist but think they are "just seeing it for what it is!"

+1. There’s a lot of trash on here who identify with the brf.

The BRF is more relatable than Otumfuo Osei Tutu II of Ghana or King Mohammed VI.

Its not that they're the most relatable. Its that Americans are un(der)educated and the only language you need to understand to get the scandals of the BRF is English.

The few-and-the-proud remaining other monarchies require Spanish, Swedish, Norwegian, French (Monégasque), Japanese, Arabic, Thai, or Twi.

The British royals are simultaneously the most visible and the easiest understood - you can blame that on their colonization tactics.

+100

Very true. I think the Spanish royal family should get more coverage. The women are so much more fashionable. And the current king looks way better than any of QEII’s kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/04/may-cover...story-a-continental-royal-rift

Wow so this is what Meghan and her team were working on while Harry was away in the UK. Its incredible how selfish and self absorbshed she is. Topple the monarchy? HA.

If a Vanity Fair article by a woman who can’t stand Meghan is all it takes to topple the BRF then they weren’t long for this world.

It's crazy how Meghan detractors think that literally every piece of news and information (barring the actually crazy conspiracies) that mention Meghan is somehow manufactured straight by Meghan herself. These people genuinely have no idea how the media or PR actually works.

If you think a front page feature article in Vanity Fair that offers analysis, not news, and is extremely biased toward one party in the conflict, JUST happens, then it's you who has no idea.

The first few paragraphs of the article are pure cringe:

BEFORE SHE WAS Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle referred to herself as “Rango’s mermaid.” The phrase comes from French-Cuban writer Anaïs Nin’s autobiographical novel The Four-Chambered Heart, which Meghan quoted often in her Suits era: “I must be a mermaid, Rango. I have no fear of depths and a great fear of shallow living.”

Oh no a mermaid again. A grown woman comparing herself to a mermaid.

Meghan wanted more than middling cable TV success. Elizabeth Tuke, her publicist from 2014 to 2016, encouraged her to go out for blockbusters. “You could be the next Megan Fox,” Tuke told her. Instead, she embarked on a USO tour to Afghanistan, Spain, Italy, Turkey, and England; traveled to Rwanda to build wells for clean water; and campaigned against menstrual poverty among schoolgirls in India.

She didn't embark on a tour INSTEAD of blockbusters. Blockbusters didn't want her. It's like me saying instead of marrying George Clooney, I went for my dear old husband. The truth is Clooney would never propose!

“She is this superambitious woman,” Tuke added, which shouldn’t be a dirty word. Meghan did press Q&As in her car on the way to set at four in the morning and affirmed her respect for Tuke’s role in their written agreement, with language that declared Meghan would “never minimize me as a person or my prowess in the field.”

You think this information JUST came up? Like in a journalistic investigation? Or was it that Meghan's people likely marshaled her up?

+1

I have worked in PR and this was obvious orchestrated by Meghan's PR camp to send a message to the BRF.

It clearly also speaks to her grand delusions and self importance. The BRF wasn't nice to Megs so they will be obliterated?

Images from Will and Kate's wedding below:






Yep. The British are clearly a people who want their royal family toppled because a D list American actress is annoyed.

You are conflating two different things. Meghan believing she can topple the royal family and actual societal changes endangering their long-term viability. Progressivism is definitely having a moment right now and there is nothing less progressive than one family of white Europeans having a ton of wealth because....???? You also have the fact that the royal family is not popular with younger Britons (under 24). And that at least one former colony elected to leave the commonwealth this year. Meghan did not do any of those things. Meghan’s biggest skill is seizing on larger movements and trends for her own purposes. The reason why her racism claims worked was because the BRF has done a lot to make that quite believable. They have no POC from Commonwealth countries in positions of prominence on their staff. Despite the fact that they clearly don’t only hire Britons (Jason Knauf for example is a random white guy from America). And of course there were all of Philip’s racist gaffes (“slitty eyes” ring a bell), Princess Michael’s blackface brooch and telling a group of African Americans to “go back to the colonies” (revealing herself to be both racist and uneducated).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Meghan's old interview with Craig Ferguson. What a lovely, smart woman!
The issue with the BRF is that they are all uneducated hicks, in essence, certainly have they have no clue about CRT or what racism is today. They are all like your old gramps or uncle who "are not racist, they just see it for what it is!" And what it is is a bunch of Black people not knowing their place!
Sadly, most of dcum is also nothing but a bunch of hicks, who are so racist but think they are "just seeing it for what it is!"

+1. There’s a lot of trash on here who identify with the brf.

The BRF is more relatable than Otumfuo Osei Tutu II of Ghana or King Mohammed VI.

Its not that they're the most relatable. Its that Americans are un(der)educated and the only language you need to understand to get the scandals of the BRF is English.

The few-and-the-proud remaining other monarchies require Spanish, Swedish, Norwegian, French (Monégasque), Japanese, Arabic, Thai, or Twi.

The British royals are simultaneously the most visible and the easiest understood - you can blame that on their colonization tactics.

PP, here's one of your "few-and-the-proud" monarchies below.
I'd rather the BRF than that thing.

Emperor has no clothes!

[Anonymous]

How about neither?

[Anonymous]

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-archie-spoke-with-the-queen-ahead-of-prince-philips-funeral-says-source/

[Anonymous]

This one made me laugh