Am I Going to be Obscenely Old?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a weird thread. A handful (maybe just one?) of lunatics attempting to contradict all of current obstetric guidance.

I think there’s a lot of misinterpreting of posts going on here. Yes, fertility declines with age, but no, it’s not a precipitous drop at 35, and many women can get pregnant from 35-40, and some after 40 as well. Unfortunately, you won’t know if that’s true for you as an individual until you try. So, sure, if you can, start your family before 35, but at the same time, it’s not necessarily game over if you haven’t.

But the PPs in agreement with your statement aren't saying its 100% impossible. They're saying it's much more difficult and often impossible. That is true and indisputable. Yet you have one very dedicated lunatic claiming the difference in pregnancy chances for a 28 year old versus a 41 year old are negligible. That is demonstrably false. And a really weird claim to make because it's obviously false. It's akin to the posts claiming you can be morbidly obese and perfectly healthy at the same time.

Except for it's not indisputable. I find it really strange you are so invested in women's fertility and insistent that if you are 35 it's all downhill and you will struggle, Obstetricians don't even subscribe to that notion anymore.
I really feel you are an incel getting your jollies from trying to make women feel like they are junk after 30,The mother nature crap you all use is a dead give away

Found the lunatic. You're attacking everyone that disagrees with you. It's clear as day that many different people are posting that increased age mean increased odds. It's not one person. The language gives it away. Jeff knows this via IPs.

But there's just one you trying to shoot it down. What is that? Why do you hate men? Have they rejected you all your life?

That poster is just the only one still willing to engage with someone who is taking their data from, and posted an article about, fertility rates in Canada and France in the eighteenth century.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Half my gfs waited until after 35. They wanted to finish grad school and get settled. Well, guess what? Not a single one was able to conceive naturally and about a third couldn't carry a baby to term even after getting help conceiving.

I don't know the end game of you claiming its fine to wait but you're wrong.

Mother Nature doesn't want deformed kids so she prevents them from entering the populace. She accomplishes this through difficulty conceiving and the prevalence of miscarriages.

Don't fight her- she always wins.

Doubt you’re even a woman loser. If you are, you’re a disgrace to all women.

I am not only a woman but I'm a mother. I'd guess you're not, hence the saltiness about waiting too long.

Sad.

Lol, what’s sadder is an incel pretending to be a mother in a vain attempt to get a young woman to sleep with and have babies with him. Sorry bud, all the good ones are going for the hot, successful guys. If you’re actually a woman, stop posting bs about Mother Nature and deformed children and tend to your own defective spawn.