Or more You could pocket the cost of your private health insurance, private school tuition, 529 savings, vacation more |
Translation: I am wealthy and screw the poorer people in society. Their kids may have higher rates of infant mortality due to lack of maternity leave but I need that luxury minivan! |
| European countries have generous parental leave policies for a reason. Demographics. Their populations are aging. Society needs people to make the "lifestyle choice" to have children. |
You took what I said the wrong way - I'd rather pay for it in taxes so that everyone can reap the benefits and not just me. You sound pretty disgusting. Let me guess, you voted for MAGA? |
|
Everyone is not an upper income family. Everyone will need hospital services at some time
Every pregnancy will end in a birth, parental leave is a necessity to recover from birth. Infant is not a lifestyle choice. They have to have a lot of care. Children are born into all kinds of circumstances. We are in this world together A few weeks of parental leave is not much to ask for. You will work a lifetime, society provides your kid with 12 years of public schooling anyway. |
Having kids is a choice. If you can’t afford to have kids and maintain the lifestyle you want, then don’t have kids. You don’t have the right to have everyone else pay for your choices. Grow up. |
+1 it’s amazing that people get so huffy about funding a few weeks of maternity leave and forget that we as a society fund an extensive system of free public school. Kids are at their most vulnerable and needy as infants. |
The previous poster reflects the prevailing attitude in the US, at least when it comes to those who control the levers of power. And this is why nothing will ever change. Truly, we are on our own. But hey, tax credit! |
Every other major decision in life involves (or should involve) a consideration of cost. I don't understand why some women seem to think the decision to have kids should not involve this type of analysis. |
Nobody asks to be born Maternity leave is for the benefit of the baby |
+ 1 I would be embarrassed to be some of these other posters in here asking (no DEMANDING) other people to pay for my lifestyle. It's so tacky and low class. Get a better job. Go back to school. Don't have kids before you are financially prepared for them! Abortion exists so don't @me about unplanned pregnancies. |
THIS |
I'm not sure what bubble you live in to think that the US Sarah's experience was "extreme" and a "worst case scenario". I've read DCUM long enough to know it's not, and that there's plenty of working women who save, plan, research in advance, and are still knocked flat by the lack of support due to pure circumstance. I got 10 weeks of paid leave with my first, 16 weeks paid leave with my second, we had a good experience with our daycare, and I returned to a decent work environment. It was still so hard, and between keeping up with work, not sleeping, catching constant illness, and just plain missing my babies - we were burnt out. Yet my company's policies are considered generous, and the (minimum humane) amount of flexibility and accommodation I was offered in returning to work is held up as a shining example. So if I'm representative of a relatively positive experience, it's easy to extrapolate how shitty it can get for those who didn't manage to align all the stars of career, company policy, money, partner, care, health, timing etc. And yet people in this thread seem to think that's a character flaw as opposed to a cultural and systemic problem. It's f*cked up. |
FYI More women work in Sweden than here Women do get jobs and are employed Babies are born into all kinds of circumstances. You cannot change that. Get over it Maternity leave is to recover from birth. Sick leave to recover from a broken leg, heart surgery, lung cancer is covered What is the big deal? How is birth lifestyle? |
You can take the time off but don't expect your income to be covered by other people (i.e. taxpayers). Save in advance so you can still pay your bills. |