APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?

[Anonymous]

Got the seats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also really impressed by Stengel talking openly about errors her office has made in the past with projections and how they’ve change process to avoid repeating them.

I had the same observation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Got the seats?

Yes

[Anonymous]

The guy with the glasses is one tough interrogator. I feel sorry for the people who have to face him.

[Anonymous]

I’m pretty sure McKrazy is there, I think I just recognized her laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The guy with the glasses is one tough interrogator. I feel sorry for the people who have to face him.

No, he’s an idiot. Anyone who understands a boundary process knows you can’t say for sure how many kids will move until the boundaries are done. He’s posturing and being difficult because that’s what he does. But he never actually does anything more than that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also really impressed by Stengel talking openly about errors her office has made in the past with projections and how they’ve change process to avoid repeating them.

I had the same observation.

In this meeting and at least one previous one, admission that mistakes have been made has been what triggered the nasty laughter in the crowd. I’m glad that TT called out the hecklers this time, and that the board has publicly spoken in support of staff.

[Anonymous]

Why can't they wait another year for the census data to come out to get more accurate projection data?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why can't they wait another year for the census data to come out to get more accurate projection data?

Because Reed is opening in Fall of 2021 and needs to have a boundary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy with the glasses is one tough interrogator. I feel sorry for the people who have to face him.

No, he’s an idiot. Anyone who understands a boundary process knows you can’t say for sure how many kids will move until the boundaries are done. He’s posturing and being difficult because that’s what he does. But he never actually does anything more than that.

He passed on very specific questions that were clearly posed to him by members of the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy with the glasses is one tough interrogator. I feel sorry for the people who have to face him.

No, he’s an idiot. Anyone who understands a boundary process knows you can’t say for sure how many kids will move until the boundaries are done. He’s posturing and being difficult because that’s what he does. But he never actually does anything more than that.

He passed on very specific questions that were clearly posed to him by members of the public.

Because he didn’t have the nerve to give them an answer they didn’t want to hear. Everyone else involved has shown strong leadership and a willingness to own their role in the process, but Goldstein just punts the hard work to someone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy with the glasses is one tough interrogator. I feel sorry for the people who have to face him.

No, he’s an idiot. Anyone who understands a boundary process knows you can’t say for sure how many kids will move until the boundaries are done. He’s posturing and being difficult because that’s what he does. But he never actually does anything more than that.

He passed on very specific questions that were clearly posed to him by members of the public.

yeah- he was trying to repeat the Key talking point, which only makes sense to those who are within the Key boundary- that somehow they will still need more seats in the Rosslyn neighborhood so thus the move is pointless. First part true- second part- uh no- it will give them 600 seats- that's a good start.

[Anonymous]

someone guffawed toward the end of the meeting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy with the glasses is one tough interrogator. I feel sorry for the people who have to face him.

No, he’s an idiot. Anyone who understands a boundary process knows you can’t say for sure how many kids will move until the boundaries are done. He’s posturing and being difficult because that’s what he does. But he never actually does anything more than that.

He passed on very specific questions that were clearly posed to him by members of the public.

yeah- he was trying to repeat the Key talking point, which only makes sense to those who are within the Key boundary- that somehow they will still need more seats in the Rosslyn neighborhood so thus the move is pointless. First part true- second part- uh no- it will give them 600 seats- that's a good start.

I continue to be baffled by this argument. “We can’t fix everything completely right now, so let’s make things even worse instead.” Huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:someone guffawed toward the end of the meeting.

Some people can’t help but be morons.