DMV Preseason Rankings

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Does anyone have details on which colleges signed players from each club?

RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad! RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!RantingSoccerDad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, your statements become more moronic with each additional post.

I just can't bother to even engage you but will post this just to shut you up. The highest bracket in the oldest division is comprised of six ECNL teams out of 12 or 13. Some clubs are committed to JeffCup. Also notice that several ECNL teams were placed in the lower bracket. Notice that in most of the age groups, you have ECNL clubs placed in lower brackets, which should help you understand that some ECNL teams are not considered on the same level as certain non-ECNL/DA teams.

Certain clubs are committed to JeffCup and Bethesda Cup and will do them despite also doing ECNL showcases.

JeffCup 2019
OHIO ELITE ECNL (OS)
MCLEAN ECNL 01 GIRLS (VA)
RICHMOND UNITED ECNL U19 2000 (VA)
BETHESDA SC ECNL UNION 01 (MD)
CAROLINA ELITE SA ECNL (SC)
PSA NATIONAL '00 (NJ)
SAC SHOWCASE PREMIER G00 (MD)
BRYC ELITE ACADEMY ECNL U18-19 (VA)
LOWER MERION SC STORM (PAE)
NJ STALLIONS 00-01 STAMPEDE EDP-NL (NJ)
BEACH FC 01/00G RED (VA)
CENTURY 00 GOLD (PAW)

Yes, and far less attend and the competition becomes heavily skewed towards NPL and EDP level teams. At U16 only 5 of 11 teams in the top bracket were ECNL. Compared to U13 when 8 out of 12 teams were either DA or ECNL teams. The top bracket does a total flip in the prime showcasing years.

At the current ratio Pipeline would only play 1 ECNL team out 3 possible games when in years earlier it would have been 2 ECNL teams. The point isn't that ECNL teams don't continue to go to Jeff Cup or other tourneys like WAGS but that it is no longer a priority showcase for those teams and fewer of them attend over time.

I don't deny your point. ECNL showcases become the main priority for ECNL clubs. It is an issue for clubs like Pipeline and is increasingly becoming more of an issue. The point I continue to make is that there will always be non-DA/ECNL teams like Pipeline that are capable of competing with the top ECNL teams. Such clubs will have a more difficult job of getting exposure to the top DI programs. It is not impossible but is more challenging.

With two national platforms available for kids to play in these unicorn teams are becoming increasingly rare. The ability to retain the players is going to be a greater challenge moving forward. The 05 Pipeline team will likely lose its core players over the next two years as a result of dilution.

I don't know if that is accurate. Pipeline maintains elite teams at every age group and has for years. Even with access to DA, the club still features elite level non-DA/ECNL teams. I know Regionals are not the sane as ECNL Nationals but Pipeline is sending all of their girls teams to Regionals. The clubs players are going to top colleges and that was the case with ECNL and will be the case with DA. To its credit, Pipeline is know for its success producing quality teams and players. Even ECNL coaches will tell you as much. So although I agree that Pipeline might lose players to the DA program and has to maintain an intense travel program to play in showcases and national tournaments, the team is very bit as successful as any ECNL/DA team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, your statements become more moronic with each additional post.

I just can't bother to even engage you but will post this just to shut you up. The highest bracket in the oldest division is comprised of six ECNL teams out of 12 or 13. Some clubs are committed to JeffCup. Also notice that several ECNL teams were placed in the lower bracket. Notice that in most of the age groups, you have ECNL clubs placed in lower brackets, which should help you understand that some ECNL teams are not considered on the same level as certain non-ECNL/DA teams.

Certain clubs are committed to JeffCup and Bethesda Cup and will do them despite also doing ECNL showcases.

JeffCup 2019
OHIO ELITE ECNL (OS)
MCLEAN ECNL 01 GIRLS (VA)
RICHMOND UNITED ECNL U19 2000 (VA)
BETHESDA SC ECNL UNION 01 (MD)
CAROLINA ELITE SA ECNL (SC)
PSA NATIONAL '00 (NJ)
SAC SHOWCASE PREMIER G00 (MD)
BRYC ELITE ACADEMY ECNL U18-19 (VA)
LOWER MERION SC STORM (PAE)
NJ STALLIONS 00-01 STAMPEDE EDP-NL (NJ)
BEACH FC 01/00G RED (VA)
CENTURY 00 GOLD (PAW)

Yes, and far less attend and the competition becomes heavily skewed towards NPL and EDP level teams. At U16 only 5 of 11 teams in the top bracket were ECNL. Compared to U13 when 8 out of 12 teams were either DA or ECNL teams. The top bracket does a total flip in the prime showcasing years.

At the current ratio Pipeline would only play 1 ECNL team out 3 possible games when in years earlier it would have been 2 ECNL teams. The point isn't that ECNL teams don't continue to go to Jeff Cup or other tourneys like WAGS but that it is no longer a priority showcase for those teams and fewer of them attend over time.

I don't deny your point. ECNL showcases become the main priority for ECNL clubs. It is an issue for clubs like Pipeline and is increasingly becoming more of an issue. The point I continue to make is that there will always be non-DA/ECNL teams like Pipeline that are capable of competing with the top ECNL teams. Such clubs will have a more difficult job of getting exposure to the top DI programs. It is not impossible but is more challenging.

With two national platforms available for kids to play in these unicorn teams are becoming increasingly rare. The ability to retain the players is going to be a greater challenge moving forward. The 05 Pipeline team will likely lose its core players over the next two years as a result of dilution.

I don't know if that is accurate. Pipeline maintains elite teams at every age group and has for years. Even with access to DA, the club still features elite level non-DA/ECNL teams. I know Regionals are not the sane as ECNL Nationals but Pipeline is sending all of their girls teams to Regionals. The clubs players are going to top colleges and that was the case with ECNL and will be the case with DA. To its credit, Pipeline is know for its success producing quality teams and players. Even ECNL coaches will tell you as much. So although I agree that Pipeline might lose players to the DA program and has to maintain an intense travel program to play in showcases and national tournaments, the team is very bit as successful as any ECNL/DA team.

Thanks pipeline dad for killing the thread. Congrats on all of those gotsoccer points though.

[Anonymous]

Let's get back to ranking the local teams NOT pipeline that are SO dominant in EDP and GotSoccer.

[Anonymous]

1. 05 Fcv da
2. 05 metro United da
3. 05 Arlington da
4. 05 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
5. 05 McLean ecnl
6. 05 Maryland ecnl

[Anonymous]

1. 04 Fcv da
2. 04 Arlington da
3. 04 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
4. 04 metro United da
5. 04 McLean ecnl
6. 04 Maryland ecnl

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. 04 Fcv da
2. 04 Arlington da
3. 04 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
4. 04 metro United da
5. 04 McLean ecnl
6. 04 Maryland ecnl

What TF are your drinking? Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. 05 Fcv da
2. 05 metro United da
3. 05 Arlington da
4. 05 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
5. 05 McLean ecnl
6. 05 Maryland ecnl

MU 05 DAD RIGHT BACK AT IT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. 05 Fcv da
2. 05 metro United da
3. 05 Arlington da
4. 05 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
5. 05 McLean ecnl
6. 05 Maryland ecnl

MU 05 DAD RIGHT BACK AT IT.

At least fcv YouTube dad is with a team that wins. Same with pipeline dad. Spirit/mu dad is the worst.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. 05 Fcv da
2. 05 metro United da
3. 05 Arlington da
4. 05 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
5. 05 McLean ecnl
6. 05 Maryland ecnl

MU 05 DAD RIGHT BACK AT IT.

At least fcv YouTube dad is with a team that wins. Same with pipeline dad. Spirit/mu dad is the worst.

Sorry but MU DA and Arlington DA are not top 5. Maryland ECNL is struggling. You folks need to look beyond DA/ECNL.

FCV, McLean and Bethesda are the only teams that I would consider worthy of top 5 status. VDA should get some consideration as should. Sadly, I think if Baltimore teams are not eligible, you don't don't have more than four teams worthy of elite status.

[Anonymous]

VDA and McLean will be lucky to finish 3rd in their ECNL brackets!

Hard to tell with DA...they group teams based upon quality, so weaker teams face weaker opponents. Not random.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. 05 Fcv da
2. 05 metro United da
3. 05 Arlington da
4. 05 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
5. 05 McLean ecnl
6. 05 Maryland ecnl

MU 05 DAD RIGHT BACK AT IT.

At least fcv YouTube dad is with a team that wins. Same with pipeline dad. Spirit/mu dad is the worst.

Sorry but MU DA and Arlington DA are not top 5. Maryland ECNL is struggling. You folks need to look beyond DA/ECNL.

FCV, McLean and Bethesda are the only teams that I would consider worthy of top 5 status. VDA should get some consideration as should. Sadly, I think if Baltimore teams are not eligible, you don't don't have more than four teams worthy of elite status.

VDA 05 manhandled Bethesda 05 two weeks ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. 05 Fcv da
2. 05 metro United da
3. 05 Arlington da
4. 05 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
5. 05 McLean ecnl
6. 05 Maryland ecnl

MU 05 DAD RIGHT BACK AT IT.

At least fcv YouTube dad is with a team that wins. Same with pipeline dad. Spirit/mu dad is the worst.

Sorry but MU DA and Arlington DA are not top 5. Maryland ECNL is struggling. You folks need to look beyond DA/ECNL.

FCV, McLean and Bethesda are the only teams that I would consider worthy of top 5 status. VDA should get some consideration as should. Sadly, I think if Baltimore teams are not eligible, you don't don't have more than four teams worthy of elite status.

VDA 05 manhandled Bethesda 05 two weeks ago.

Spirit VA beat vda!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. 05 Fcv da
2. 05 metro United da
3. 05 Arlington da
4. 05 Bethesda/Mrm Rush ecnl
5. 05 McLean ecnl
6. 05 Maryland ecnl

MU 05 DAD RIGHT BACK AT IT.

At least fcv YouTube dad is with a team that wins. Same with pipeline dad. Spirit/mu dad is the worst.

Sorry but MU DA and Arlington DA are not top 5. Maryland ECNL is struggling. You folks need to look beyond DA/ECNL.

FCV, McLean and Bethesda are the only teams that I would consider worthy of top 5 status. VDA should get some consideration as should. Sadly, I think if Baltimore teams are not eligible, you don't don't have more than four teams worthy of elite status.

VDA 05 manhandled Bethesda 05 two weeks ago.

Spirit VA beat vda!!!!!

Yes. The game was 1-0 in a February showcase. Congrats. You guys are amazing. Posters are using a team’s body of work for these rankings.

[Anonymous]

MU 05 got beat by Richmond. VDA 05 didnt.