He/they knew the rules about drugs and knives and violated both. Is it a surprise they are expelling him. OP should have gotten an attorney the day it happened and put him in a treatment program/therapy and been proactive vs. letting natural consequences happen. This will follow him forever. |
Wow, you are so cool. |
A kid who is doing well in school, participates on sports teams and has a weekend job probably doesn't have drug problem or need drug treatment. Vaping a bit of pot while being highly functional is not a sign of a delinquent or addict.
Should he have been doing it - no. Should there be consequences - yes but in line with the 'crime'. Expulsion and charges are absolutely ridiculous. A knife in a car in many places is culturally normal and appropriate. I carry a multitool with a good size blade in my car. I use it frequently for a wide range of reasons. |
A kid with a job, in sports and does well in school can absolutely have a drug problem. Bottomline is he got caught with drugs. That is an issue on school policy. You having a blade in your car, which is not on school grounds, is ok. On school grounds is not ok. He knew the rules. Parents knew the rules. |
I agree. I feel bad for the kid. |
Answer the question. |
Sorry if this was mentioned already as I didn't have the patience to read all 8 pages. Drug convictions have some impact on federal student loans. In the past it might have been an automatic disqualification but I think they changed that. Something to look into before a hearing. |
The majority of highly functional kids who smoke pot don't have a drug problem. He could be a rare one but something like 40% of kids smoke pot before graduating high school. They aren't all drug addicts. Regular pot use to the degree that is is problematic typically impacts motivation and engagement. Yes he broke the rules, no he shouldn't be doing drugs - but the punishment doesn't fit the crime. |
Bringing a lawyer to the school board meeting is a waste of money, OP. They'll tell you that you and the attorney should have at the school board hearing.
|
PP above. I still don't understand why OP threw her kid to the wolves at the school board meeting and is just now lawyering up. |
DP. I'll answer. Because the chances of an individual being able to bankrupt the County, especially when the kid was technically in violation, are slim to none. Could someone have been persistent enough to get the decision overturned? Of course, but I'd bet that the chance of you getting bankrupt in that pursuit would have been much higher than the county going bankrupt. Also, even if you were able to bankrupt the county (which is nonexistent), it definitely wouldn't be a fast process. |
Hindsight is 20/20. Maybe OP didn't grasp that grown adults wouldn't get the difference between a 4 inch pocket knife locked in a car and a weapon brought into school to harm others. Maybe she should have understood given the atmosphere we have around violence in school, but I don't think she was throwing her kids to the wolves. She should still hire a lawyer who specializes in this area and has significant experience with the specific school district to see if there is anything that can be done to mitigate the results. That's the best she can do at this point. OP, if you're still on the thread, good luck and post back if you're able to have any of the decisions overturned. |
It wouldn't cross my mind that a camping knife in the CAR would violate school rules. Sure, you can't bring inside, but in the car? I don't mind the rule, but I think it's easy for someone not to know it and punishment should be educational (community service, detention after school) and not something that reduces access to education. |
So what if it is not a "fast process"? It can be done. "Technically in violation" is a potentially broad term. There are lawyers that specialize in this type of thing - and they don't just work for the county. |
Hint: The schools usually do this type of thing on a Friday for a reason - it is to their advantage. |