Kate Middleton glamming it up at the State Dinner

[Anonymous]

Kate looks gorgeous.

Her dress is not my favorite as very few women can wear a mermaid dress.

But she looks beautiful and regal as always.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would such a privileged and wealthy woman in her 30s age so prematurely? I have colleagues in the dc nonprofit industry who look fantastic at that age and older. All working moms middle class /upper middle class. The fast decline of her looks is really puzzling.

Maybe the rumors about Prince William are true (that he's jealous, petty, vindictive, self absorbed, and throws temper tantrums like his father when he doesn't get his way). If they are true, then he is probably hard to live with on a daily basis. If you're always tense and feel like you're walking on eggshells, that's going to take a toll on your appearance.

[Anonymous]

She doesn't need botox. She could fix that prominent line in her forehead by gaining 10-15 pounds. And she'd probably like her life a lot better if she felt like she could eat bread whenever she wanted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would such a privileged and wealthy woman in her 30s age so prematurely? I have colleagues in the dc nonprofit industry who look fantastic at that age and older. All working moms middle class /upper middle class. The fast decline of her looks is really puzzling.

It’s likely the stress. The only time I’ve seen women age so quickly is the two final years when they are up for partner in my firm. It’s like watching a time machine.

You see the same phenomenon with U.S. presidents though I'm not precisely sure what Kate has to be so stressed about.

Are you kidding? She is raising the future king and two other kids who have to look perfect and behave perfectly. Not to mention look fantastic herself and appease the Queen and other people who don't think she works.

Not pp, but lol, do you really think she's doing all or most or even half of the raising?!

Even if she was - Kate isn't the first woman to raise three kids and a future King. I think Diana did a fabulous job. So did Elizabeth. And about a hundred other predecessors.

Di especially didn't look like crap whenever she went out.

I think she is more hands on than Diana! This would please the Kate troll who complains she doesn't work. Also, the Queen probably picks her clothes so I'm sure she has little input on that. And third how do you all know how hands on Kate is? Are you the nanny?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would such a privileged and wealthy woman in her 30s age so prematurely? I have colleagues in the dc nonprofit industry who look fantastic at that age and older. All working moms middle class /upper middle class. The fast decline of her looks is really puzzling.

It’s likely the stress. The only time I’ve seen women age so quickly is the two final years when they are up for partner in my firm. It’s like watching a time machine.

You see the same phenomenon with U.S. presidents though I'm not precisely sure what Kate has to be so stressed about.

Are you kidding? She is raising the future king and two other kids who have to look perfect and behave perfectly. Not to mention look fantastic herself and appease the Queen and other people who don't think she works.

Not pp, but lol, do you really think she's doing all or most or even half of the raising?!

Even if she was - Kate isn't the first woman to raise three kids and a future King. I think Diana did a fabulous job. So did Elizabeth. And about a hundred other predecessors.

Di especially didn't look like crap whenever she went out.

I think she is more hands on than Diana! This would please the Kate troll who complains she doesn't work. Also, the Queen probably picks her clothes so I'm sure she has little input on that. And third how do you all know how hands on Kate is? Are you the nanny?

You sound like a no nothing idiot if you really think the Queen of England has nothing better to do than pick out her grand daughter in law's clothes

[Anonymous]

Why do people get upset when they comment on something that anyone with eyes can see: i.e. the prominent lines in Kate's forehead.

They're clear as day and she's only 36. It's not common to be aging as fast as she is, especially when you consider how privileged and cosseted she is and how she has access to the best skin care in the world.

[Anonymous]

I think that Kate looks gorgeous and I love that dress on her.

She is a bit too thin and could probably stand to gain a little weight but she looks beautiful as is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do people get upset when they comment on something that anyone with eyes can see: i.e. the prominent lines in Kate's forehead.

They're clear as day and she's only 36. It's not common to be aging as fast as she is, especially when you consider how privileged and cosseted she is and how she has access to the best skin care in the world.

I think you are delusional if you think most 35-40 year old women don't have lines.

All of them do, especially the ones with children.

Kate looks her age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do people get upset when they comment on something that anyone with eyes can see: i.e. the prominent lines in Kate's forehead.

They're clear as day and she's only 36. It's not common to be aging as fast as she is, especially when you consider how privileged and cosseted she is and how she has access to the best skin care in the world.

I think you are delusional if you think most 35-40 year old women don't have lines.

All of them do, especially the ones with children.

Kate looks her age.

Most women in this age bracket can’t afford expensive Botox, fillers and peels. Kate can do it’s pathetic she has lines.

[Anonymous]

she could most definitely benefit from gaining a few pounds to fill out her face. The super thin face brings out her wrinkles and really ages her. That dress is terrible too. Looks like a bridesmaid dress from 1986.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would such a privileged and wealthy woman in her 30s age so prematurely? I have colleagues in the dc nonprofit industry who look fantastic at that age and older. All working moms middle class /upper middle class. The fast decline of her looks is really puzzling.

It’s likely the stress. The only time I’ve seen women age so quickly is the two final years when they are up for partner in my firm. It’s like watching a time machine.

You see the same phenomenon with U.S. presidents though I'm not precisely sure what Kate has to be so stressed about.

Are you kidding? She is raising the future king and two other kids who have to look perfect and behave perfectly. Not to mention look fantastic herself and appease the Queen and other people who don't think she works.

Not pp, but lol, do you really think she's doing all or most or even half of the raising?!

Even if she was - Kate isn't the first woman to raise three kids and a future King. I think Diana did a fabulous job. So did Elizabeth. And about a hundred other predecessors.

Di especially didn't look like crap whenever she went out.

These are much younger pictures of Diana. You can't compare a upper 20 year old Diana to a mid 30 year old Kate.

Kate is the same age Diana was when she died. They both look like 30 year olds.


Diana at 35:



Kate at 36:

[Anonymous]

Jeff, please shut down the Kate-obsessed troll.

It’s off the charts.

Normal people can come on here and say “I like this about Kate, and I don’t like this.” And people can discuss and agree or disagree. But this individual is a one-way street. And you can’t have a thread without getting interrupted every other post with really cruel criticism. About aging, Botox, and work.

I really suggest blocking the person’s IP for a little while so the rest of us can have a fun discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do people get upset when they comment on something that anyone with eyes can see: i.e. the prominent lines in Kate's forehead.

They're clear as day and she's only 36. It's not common to be aging as fast as she is, especially when you consider how privileged and cosseted she is and how she has access to the best skin care in the world.

I think you are delusional if you think most 35-40 year old women don't have lines.

All of them do, especially the ones with children.

Kate looks her age.

Most women in this age bracket can’t afford expensive Botox, fillers and peels. Kate can do it’s pathetic she has lines.

She is smarter than those women who get botox.

Those botox women end up looking like frozen plastic monsters after a while.

There is zero reason for for a young, 36 year old to inject herself with botox. She is at the prime of her life.

Age gracefully, not like a science experiment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff, please shut down the Kate-obsessed troll.

It’s off the charts.

Normal people can come on here and say “I like this about Kate, and I don’t like this.” And people can discuss and agree or disagree. But this individual is a one-way street. And you can’t have a thread without getting interrupted every other post with really cruel criticism. About aging, Botox, and work.

I really suggest blocking the person’s IP for a little while so the rest of us can have a fun discussion.

That Kate hater is so irrational and prolific.

Just ignore her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do people get upset when they comment on something that anyone with eyes can see: i.e. the prominent lines in Kate's forehead.

They're clear as day and she's only 36. It's not common to be aging as fast as she is, especially when you consider how privileged and cosseted she is and how she has access to the best skin care in the world.

I think you are delusional if you think most 35-40 year old women don't have lines.

All of them do, especially the ones with children.

Kate looks her age.

Not like she does. Do you have those deep lines at 36?