Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think he assaulted Ford. There a couple of reasons why:

1. The friend that she went to the party with does not support her story. If things happened the way that she said they did, her friend would have remembered that night. She left the party without talking to her friend. That friend would have been angry. Two girls at a house with 4 boys and one of them leaves without telling the other? That friend would have called her the next day asking what the heck happened. Also what kind of friend gets assaulted by two guys and leaves her friend in the house with the same two guys???

2. Her family is not supporting her. That is very telling.

Bingo. Right there.


Between this, and the stuff in HER yearbook (57 sexual partners before graduation?) , it's clear she had some deep seated problems as a teen. She's a victim. But not of Kavenaugh.

Link to her yearbook?

PP is lying. There's nothing like that in CBF's yearbook. Her parents aren't openly supporting her because they still live in the DC older money community.

https://twitter.com/TopRopeTravis/status/1045089112880041984

Dr. Ford’s father, Ralph Blasey IV, a Republican, is on the board of Columbia Country Club in MD. He stated through a family friend he is not publicly backing his daughter’s allegations because he believes he will lose his position with the country club.
The information was passed by a Blasey family friend who has invited both Dr. Ford and the author of the letter supporting Brett Kavanaugh to a wedding in the near future. This should most certainly make for an interesting dynamic if both were to attend.

Her dad is choosing position with the county club over his daughter. Daddy issues may be what drove her down this path for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused on what happens from here. Can anyone explain the next steps taken? Will there be some sort of vote? Or will there be a continuation of investigation?? I can't seem to find anything that speaks to what next steps in the process are.

Judiciary will vote. Whether they “recommend” Kavanaugh or not, McConnell will still have a vote, probably tomorrow.

[Anonymous]

Wow. I knew Montco Republicans were disgusting, but this really puts a point on it. No wonder she didn’t come forward sooner. These people are awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will happen to someone here: a year or three from now you see Kavanaugh in Bethesda or Nats Park or across the kids basketball court. What do you do?

I'd leave him alone, because I know people like that value any normal moment they can get.

He may be in jail.

[Anonymous]

Pretend that there was a third person in the room with Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Do you think Kavanaugh, as a member of Ken Starr's team, would've been satisfied with a letter from that person saying they had no recollection of the event? Wouldn't get them in for an FBI interview? Wouldn't subpoena them?

No, of course not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This will happen to someone here: a year or three from now you see Kavanaugh in Bethesda or Nats Park or across the kids basketball court. What do you do?

Say thanks coach as I have been for a number of years, and ask what time he needs the kids at the next game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any Senator who votes for Kavanaugh today is no different from Mark Judge standing in the corner egging Kav on during the assault. Despicable.

Collins and murkowski will have to go back to their shitty states . Jeff flake is a flake and it will be glorious to watch Manchin lose his seat even after voting for Bart O’kavanaugh . Yeah I don’t pity them , leadership requires courage .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think he assaulted Ford. There a couple of reasons why:

1. The friend that she went to the party with does not support her story. If things happened the way that she said they did, her friend would have remembered that night. She left the party without talking to her friend. That friend would have been angry. Two girls at a house with 4 boys and one of them leaves without telling the other? That friend would have called her the next day asking what the heck happened. Also what kind of friend gets assaulted by two guys and leaves her friend in the house with the same two guys???

2. Her family is not supporting her. That is very telling.

Bingo. Right there.


Between this, and the stuff in HER yearbook (57 sexual partners before graduation?) , it's clear she had some deep seated problems as a teen. She's a victim. But not of Kavenaugh.

Link to her yearbook?

PP is lying. There's nothing like that in CBF's yearbook. Her parents aren't openly supporting her because they still live in the DC older money community.

https://twitter.com/TopRopeTravis/status/1045089112880041984

Dr. Ford’s father, Ralph Blasey IV, a Republican, is on the board of Columbia Country Club in MD. He stated through a family friend he is not publicly backing his daughter’s allegations because he believes he will lose his position with the country club.
The information was passed by a Blasey family friend who has invited both Dr. Ford and the author of the letter supporting Brett Kavanaugh to a wedding in the near future. This should most certainly make for an interesting dynamic if both were to attend.

Her dad is choosing position with the county club over his daughter. Daddy issues may be what drove her down this path for sure.

Yes, this is ridiculous. It's all spurious gossiping and I won't believe a word from that isn't directly quoted from the parents' mouth or the siblings' mouth.

It's pretty bloody obvious that the pro Kavanaugh and pro Ford sides are entirely driven by their agendas and are populated by people who want to twist everything to fit their agenda. The twitter post is a perfect example. And almost everything written in these three threads on DCUM reflect it too. Look at how quickly people jump from Kavanaugh to notions of evil white men conspiracies. Look at how quickly people are to accept Ford's allegation despite it's riddled more holes than a cheese grater.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still want to know if Feinstein has a drinking problem.

If she does, that would certainly explain some very inappropriate behavior on her part towards an acquaintance of mine back in the early 90's, in an office in the Russell building.

She'd better tread lightly, because the #metoo movement can mean "men too"

Why tread lightly, bra? Bretty showed - just lie harder. The old white male fossils will lap it up (of course, they’re also all ensnared by Russia and have a vested interest in getting a dirtbag on the Court to protect their sorry butts).

Haha, love this comment.

[Anonymous]

i am sure anyone of them on the committee could have subpoenaed anyone. I wonder why they didn't????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think he assaulted Ford. There a couple of reasons why:

1. The friend that she went to the party with does not support her story. If things happened the way that she said they did, her friend would have remembered that night. She left the party without talking to her friend. That friend would have been angry. Two girls at a house with 4 boys and one of them leaves without telling the other? That friend would have called her the next day asking what the heck happened. Also what kind of friend gets assaulted by two guys and leaves her friend in the house with the same two guys???

2. Her family is not supporting her. That is very telling.

Bingo. Right there.


Between this, and the stuff in HER yearbook (57 sexual partners before graduation?) , it's clear she had some deep seated problems as a teen. She's a victim. But not of Kavenaugh.

Link to her yearbook?

PP is lying. There's nothing like that in CBF's yearbook. Her parents aren't openly supporting her because they still live in the DC older money community.

https://twitter.com/TopRopeTravis/status/1045089112880041984

Dr. Ford’s father, Ralph Blasey IV, a Republican, is on the board of Columbia Country Club in MD. He stated through a family friend he is not publicly backing his daughter’s allegations because he believes he will lose his position with the country club.
The information was passed by a Blasey family friend who has invited both Dr. Ford and the author of the letter supporting Brett Kavanaugh to a wedding in the near future. This should most certainly make for an interesting dynamic if both were to attend.

Her dad is choosing position with the county club over his daughter. Daddy issues may be what drove her down this path for sure.

Another day in White america family values

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will happen to someone here: a year or three from now you see Kavanaugh in Bethesda or Nats Park or across the kids basketball court. What do you do?

Say thanks coach as I have been for a number of years, and ask what time he needs the kids at the next game.

I wouldn’t trust my child around an angry, entitled rapist, attempted or completed. I can’t believe you would put your politics ahead of keeping your child safe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:i am sure anyone of them on the committee could have subpoenaed anyone. I wonder why they didn't????

Duh. They don’t actually care what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From the clips I've seen and my experience with alcoholics, I'm going to posit that Kavanaugh is most likely a full-blown alcoholic who went from binge drinking and blackouts in his teens and twenties to steady, daily (probably all day some days) consumption to keep his addicted, altered biochemistry in check. I'm only guessing.

But first it would explain some physical things--his puffiness, extremely broken facial capilaries, and brown teeth. For moneyed folk who have the means for elective procedures, brown teeth are usually an indicator of something internal manifesting outward that can't be repaired through cosmetic dentistry, like long-term liver or kidney disease.

Second and most importantly, his behavior. He acts and over-emotes *exactly* the way an addict acts and emotes when they are forced into a situation where they *have* to be sober. Worse, he's forced into that situation because of a questioning of his prior behavior while intoxicated. Shouty, ultra-defensive, deflective, trying to seem "regular" angry except that internal gauge is broken so unable to recognize that he's coming off as rage angry, etc.

He also seems like someone who's yet to admit a problem or, worse, think he has one--so his rage never ends at having to be sober while presenting in a high pressure public forum. I bet he used to down lots of hard liquor, but switched to beer because you "can't be an alcoholic with just beer." Hence all the beer talk.

This. I grew up in an Irish-catholic family with several relatives who were/are alcoholics. It was thus so easy to recognize all the tactics Kavanaugh employed - they are cultural and they are also classic denial mechanisms of alcoholics. One of my relatives was a high functioning alcoholic with a great career as a lawyer. After years - my entire life - of seeing him at family events where he was angry, belligerent, a mean drunk, and awful to be around, I visited him and his wife for lunch. He was congenial, kind and personable. I could not believe it was the same person. This is exactly what is going on here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lies:

-4 letters exonerate him
-devils traingle
-boofing
-legal drinking age
-Renete Alumni
-He claims to have not watched Dr. Ford

What else?

Denying that he is being depicted a "Bart O'Kavanaugh",
Denying that he was black out drunk on the bus to the baseball game and filling his description with unnecessary, meaningless, extraneous, detail about how 'great' the game was and what a beautiful day it was and how much "fun" he had at the game.

There was just so much fudging on the obvious meanings of certain words and terms.

THIS MAN IS A JUDGE. He knew what he was doing. Who cares where George Brett was playing the night of the baseball game? That's not what the hearing is about, and he knows it. It was insulting to everyone.