| DP. How science and social studies are taught under 2.0 isn't really relevant. What's much more important is how MCPS will handle these subjects when they transition to a new curriculum. These subjects were folded into 2.0 and the RFP makes no mention of them, so how MCPS will teach them moving forward really remains an open question. |
This is Discovery's team, which hasn't been updated with ELA. https://www.discoveryeducation.com/who-we-are/meet-the-curriculum-team/ Remember, however, that they did snatch Jim Fliakas, who was the ELA supervisor for MCPS. So they have their bases covered. not sure if they'd work with MCPS again after what happened - or if they'd move on to another larger system But they do have all the core contents covered. They'd be smart to focus on the arts next. |
| Even if they went with Discovery, they’re only replacing ELA and Math. Nothing else. So there’s no indication they’d utilize science or social studies materials from Discovery. |
|
I don't care about Discovery Ed's nonexistent product they might be whipping together.
MCPS has BTDT and failed in a spectacular fashion. |
Huh? MCPS is the 8th largest system in the country. There aren't many larger systems and most of them have selected their curricula. |
Science is not in the scope because MCPS adopted a new science curriculum this year. We now follow the NGSS standards same as VA publics. I wish all the mass hysteria would stop about science not being taught or being weak in MCPS. The new science curriculum is by National Geographic and does come with student textbooks, although students cannot write in them or take them home. Students, however, will have an electronic copy of the textbook. While I would prefer a hard copy textbook I also realize that MCPS would rather save money to hire aides and additional teachers rather than spend each year re-purchasing student workbooks which are not cheap. |
Forgot to mention that MCPS has not yet updated its website to reflect the new science curriculum |
| What about social studies? |
|
MCPS is going to roll that out after the new curriculum for math and ELA. One has to remember that teachers can’t plan adequately or teache adequately with too many new materials. Science is new this year, next year will be new curriculum for ELA/Math and the following year we will follow the NCSS (which by the way many companies and states are still processing)
For example, Wisconsin public schools just adopted a curriculum to fit the new push for NCSS this year. https://dpi.wi.gov/social-studies/standards |
How do you know this? I’m not doubting you, just curious. Also, how will kids learn social studies until the new curriculum comes out? Will it be via 2.0 materials? |
| I am a current MCPS employee, the 2.0 social studies will remain in effect until the changes happen as mentioned above. |
And why is none of this explained on the MCPS website? It says nothing about science or social studies. |
Here is the link to the science curriculum on the MCPS website: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/curriculum/science/ |
All that does is eventually link back to the 2.0 site if you try to find specifics. |
oh no, novice How long do you think systems - under our "newest" accountability mandates - actually stick to a curriculum framework? I recently left MCPS for a smaller system. In my 20+ years, I've seen . . . - complete autonomy (minus any standards) to - Core Learning Goals (CLGs - anyone remember those?) with partially standardized guides to - CCSS and standardized guides. Courses, particularly in science, changed all the time to reflect the latest benchmarks. There's ALWAYS a larger system making changes. MCPS is NOT the end all in terms of educational companies profiting off children. There are plenty of other larger systems that highlight the achievement gap. |