Wall Street Journal on rampant growth in percentage of college students with “disabilities”

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A couple of points: Serious mental illnesses such as bipolar disorder usually present themselves for the first time when people are 18-22. So it is possible that quite a few students who were "normal" in high school will suddenly need mental health care and accommodation in college. Secondly students who suffer from anxiety and depression can suddenly get worse when they are away from their support system. I suffered from clinical depression my freshman year, and needed more time to do my school work, but got better after I found the correct medication. So if you think mental health issues are scams to get better grades, thank your lucky stars you don't know otherwise.



Yes!
And the reason so many high school students get diagnosed with ADHD is because often kids can get by until the demands increase and then the challenges are exposed.
There are a lot of horrible people on this thread.


Right. All those kids who got admitted to Pomona suddenly developed debilitating learning disabilities upon matriculation ...


I think you're misreading many of the comments. What explains the rampant growth? That's the shocking part -- how did suddenly between 2014 and now (less than 4 years) Pomona go from 5% disabled to over 20%. Much of it because parents seeking an edge, i.e more time on tests, etc.

There are a lot of horrible people in this thread.


Could it be a change in methodology? Perhaps in 2014 they didn't include those who suffered from a mental illness. I don't see how you'd suddenly get a 4x increase in demographics in such a short time otherwise- Pomona's student body and academic stats haven't changed much (if anything, the school has gotten even more racially and socioeconomically diverse than it was in 2014).
Anonymous
If anyone was curious about what disability accommodations look like specifically from Pomona: https://www.pomona.edu/accessibility/student-accessibility/accommodation-services


Test-Taking Accommodations
50% or 100% additional time on traditional tests
Quiet location for testing
Computer test reader
Dragon Naturally Speaking as a test writing resource
Use of computer to type essay exams
Assistive technology for exams or for course work
Spelling and punctuation considerations on exams
Classroom Accommodations
Notes or course notes
Permission to record the course lecture
Preferential seating
Course handouts in an enlarged font
Course handouts in an electronic format
Use of service animal in the classroom
Assistive technology in classroom

Mobility Accommodations
Relocating classrooms, lab, field trips and living spaces in accessible locations.
Pomona Medical Supply will provide carts and mobility devices.
Foreign Language Exemption
All exemptions are processed through the Academic Procedure Committee. Contact the Associate Dean of Students to assist with this process.

Emotional Support Animals
To obtain permission to have an emotional support animal on campus, review the pets in residence hall policy and have the medical professional complete the emotional support animal application form. Once that is completed, contact the Dean of Students Office to secure permission to have an emotional support animal on campus.

Housing Accommodations
Please contact the Dean of Students Office to secure permission to have an air conditioner or single room.


Here is the form students fill out: https://www.pomona.edu/sites/default/files/disability-request-for-services.pdf and the one professionals do: https://www.pomona.edu/sites/default/files/disability-documentation-form.pdf

I find it strange that the student form asks- "What accommodations do you need?" Shouldn't this be to the judgement of the professional solely? If the student form is the primary way accommodations are assigned, the potential for abuse is significant.

A further look at "tips for accommodations" gives far too much leverage, IMO, for students to create accommodations as they WANT rather than as they NEED (or as is reasonable). https://www.pomona.edu/accessibility/student-accessibility/accommodation-services/how-make-most-your-academic-accommodations

Pomona's Common Data Set states that 94% of entering students ranked in the top 10% of their high school class. Their profile states 27% of enrolled students ranked valedictorian. Pomona seems to bend over backwards to accommodate students that I could not imagine happening at any high school. Those students clearly thrived academically- most without needing accommodations in the first place. They're not suddenly going to come into college unable to handle the lifestyle or workload. The reality is that Pomona needs to take a long hard look on the ease which it allows accommodations and ensure that the students who genuinely need them are getting the bulk of the resources.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If anyone was curious about what disability accommodations look like specifically from Pomona: https://www.pomona.edu/accessibility/student-accessibility/accommodation-services


Test-Taking Accommodations
50% or 100% additional time on traditional tests
Quiet location for testing
Computer test reader
Dragon Naturally Speaking as a test writing resource
Use of computer to type essay exams
Assistive technology for exams or for course work
Spelling and punctuation considerations on exams
Classroom Accommodations
Notes or course notes
Permission to record the course lecture
Preferential seating
Course handouts in an enlarged font
Course handouts in an electronic format
Use of service animal in the classroom
Assistive technology in classroom

Mobility Accommodations
Relocating classrooms, lab, field trips and living spaces in accessible locations.
Pomona Medical Supply will provide carts and mobility devices.
Foreign Language Exemption
All exemptions are processed through the Academic Procedure Committee. Contact the Associate Dean of Students to assist with this process.

Emotional Support Animals
To obtain permission to have an emotional support animal on campus, review the pets in residence hall policy and have the medical professional complete the emotional support animal application form. Once that is completed, contact the Dean of Students Office to secure permission to have an emotional support animal on campus.

Housing Accommodations
Please contact the Dean of Students Office to secure permission to have an air conditioner or single room.


Here is the form students fill out: https://www.pomona.edu/sites/default/files/disability-request-for-services.pdf and the one professionals do: https://www.pomona.edu/sites/default/files/disability-documentation-form.pdf

I find it strange that the student form asks- "What accommodations do you need?" Shouldn't this be to the judgement of the professional solely? If the student form is the primary way accommodations are assigned, the potential for abuse is significant.

A further look at "tips for accommodations" gives far too much leverage, IMO, for students to create accommodations as they WANT rather than as they NEED (or as is reasonable). https://www.pomona.edu/accessibility/student-accessibility/accommodation-services/how-make-most-your-academic-accommodations

Pomona's Common Data Set states that 94% of entering students ranked in the top 10% of their high school class. Their profile states 27% of enrolled students ranked valedictorian. Pomona seems to bend over backwards to accommodate students that I could not imagine happening at any high school. Those students clearly thrived academically- most without needing accommodations in the first place. They're not suddenly going to come into college unable to handle the lifestyle or workload. The reality is that Pomona needs to take a long hard look on the ease which it allows accommodations and ensure that the students who genuinely need them are getting the bulk of the resources.


Not really, everyone has a different mix of strengths and weaknesses and different accommodations do better with different people. By the time a student reaches college, they usually have an idea of what works for them, at least my DC did. Just because two students have the same diagnosis does not necessarily mean that it manifests the same in both students. There are spectrums of variation in each diagnosis and many different combinations of co-morbid issues. My DC is not at Pomona, but he has almost the same accommodations in college as he received in HS. The list shown for Pomona looks like a general boilerplate of what should be done in all colleges and universities to comply with ADA. That said, I have no experience with emotional support animals.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.wsj.com/articles/colleges-bend-the-rules-for-more-students-give-them-extra-help-1527154200

“At Pomona, 22% of students were considered disabled this year, up from 5% in 2014. Other elite schools have also seen a startling jump in disabilities, according to data from the federal government and from the schools. At Hampshire, Amherst and Smith colleges in Massachusetts and Yeshiva University in New York, one in five students are classified as disabled. At Oberlin College in Ohio, it is one in four. At Marlboro College in Vermont, it is one in three.”

I’m sorry, but this is disgraceful. It’s one thing if you are legally blind, but anxiety or ADHD should not be grounds for giving someone twice the time to take an exam. It’s unfair to the more humble students who are less inclined to take advantage of what should be reserved for people are are truly in-need.


The amount of ignorance in PP's comment is really what is disgraceful.


? How so? The rate of increase since 2014 is staggering.


Having a disability isn't disgraceful. Having a disability and attending college isn't disgraceful. Having a disability, attending college, and having appropriate accommodations isn't disgraceful either. Also, ignorant people like OP don't get to decide what is or is not a disability.



It's also disgraceful that there are those who are gaming the system and making it much more difficult for those who truly need the services. I also think some of those issues/disabilities should be considered when applying to graduate schools. Do you want a surgeon who has difficulty reading/writing and is also extremely anxious?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You are exactly right.

The other responders are in fact ignorant, and lucky that they have not had to learn the hard way that these disabilities are real (despite the fact that they are invisible).

Careful snarky posters, karma might be real...


I don't think people mind when the disabilities are real. They do mind that there is abuse of the system.

They don't mind when a blind person has a guide dog or someone with PTSD from service in Afghanistan has emotional support dog.

They do mind when someone spends $50 for a fake emotional support certificate to take their pet ferret (or camel) on the plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz8bqJaKeKk

or rich parents spending thousands for a fake diagnosis so that their kid gets extra time on the SATs https://www.thedailybeast.com/faking-adhd-gets-you-into-harvard

or college students fake ADHD to get Adderall. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mouse-man/201007/new-study-claims-it-is-easy-fake-adhd

As long as these things are allowed to occur, it undermines the case of people with real needs.
Anonymous
[vimeo]
Anonymous wrote:I'm a professor and a lot of what is going on is related to liability issues.

It used to be that a student would go to a professor and describe a situation and ask for an extension, etc. but now we are actually asked not to make those sorts of judgment calls, and frankly I wouldn't feel comfortable making them.

I'm not a doctor and I have no idea if your depression is debilitating enough for you to be given an extension, and it's not in my job description to make that call.

Therefore, I"m going to tell you that it has to be documented through disability services preferably before you start the course, etc. I don't want to be accused of favoritism or bias or anything else, so everything has to be a whole lot more legalistic than it used to be.

This is the nature of the litigious society that we live in.

But I do think there may also be an element of the student as consumer, I'm paying 60K so I want a boutique experience, etc. My daughter has some anxiety issues and I had no problem asking her psychologist for a note so that we could request a single rather than a room mate for her freshman year. Maybe 20 years ago people didn't do that, but today at that price, I want to give her every ability to succeed.

That said, there did seem to be a fairly large amount of upper middle class girls who gamed the system and got diagnosed with stress or depression so that they could have a cat -- at least at my son's big southern university.


Isn’t one way around this to drop a final exam in favor of a take-home? Either a paper or take-home final?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Truly - what is the harm of accommodations?


Do you need extra time to work this out?
Anonymous
I think anyone should be able to get an6 accommodation. And that should be noted on their college transcript. That way I as an employer can make a judgment about whether it makes sense for me to employ them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This is a huge problem. I worked at a university and one of my jobs was dealing with accommodation requests. We received a significant number of requests that were highly suspect. But we almost never rejected the request (assuming they had the minimal paperwork) and it was even rare for us to ask for a neutral evaluation.

It just wasn't worth it. We would incur significant expenses and hassle and invite the prospect of a lawsuit.

We all recognize the problem on a macro level that it creates a tremendous incentive to cheat and that it was unfair to others, but on a micro level we couldn't justify disputing all but the most egregious cases.

(To be clear, some of the increase is better diagnosis, but a lot of it isn't.)


This post is telling the real story. There is no push back from colleges and universities against a flood of people requesting disabilities on questionable grounds. Also, parents these days want their kids to have it as easy as possible. Gone are the days when it was considered character building to have to tough it out yourself. Of course, there are students with genuine disabilities who should be accommodated, no one is arguing against that. The rampant cheating of the system hurts these kids though because most reasonable and ethical people are cynical about the accommodations especially the extra time on SAT and ACT.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You are exactly right.

The other responders are in fact ignorant, and lucky that they have not had to learn the hard way that these disabilities are real (despite the fact that they are invisible).

Careful snarky posters, karma might be real...


I don't think people mind when the disabilities are real. They do mind that there is abuse of the system.

They don't mind when a blind person has a guide dog or someone with PTSD from service in Afghanistan has emotional support dog.

They do mind when someone spends $50 for a fake emotional support certificate to take their pet ferret (or camel) on the plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz8bqJaKeKk

or rich parents spending thousands for a fake diagnosis so that their kid gets extra time on the SATs https://www.thedailybeast.com/faking-adhd-gets-you-into-harvard

or college students fake ADHD to get Adderall. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mouse-man/201007/new-study-claims-it-is-easy-fake-adhd

As long as these things are allowed to occur, it undermines the case of people with real needs.



Except in this thread we have people telling those with disabled to go find their "niche" [that isn't in college]. We have lots of shaming language directed towards anyone who uses and accommodation, including calling them disgraceful. Your starting assumption is that you should be arbiter of what constitutes a "real" disability.

You want to focus on abuse of the system yet until very recently people with very disabilities were unable to get reasonable accommodations. Children with learning disabilities are still left unidentified and failed out of school. Children with identified learning disabilities are still not provided with scientifically backed learning methods and then called "lazy" or a "behavioral problem" when they still don't catch up when provided with more of the same methods that don't work. You only care about abuse of the system because it doesn't affect you at all that bright kids with a lot of potential are short changed. Personally, I'm delighted to know a pair of brothers with ADHD and dyslexia who are doing great in the engineering program at their chosen university. What's even more marvelous for me is out confident they are in themselves that they can talk about their challenges and how they overcome them without the shame people like you want to place on them.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a huge problem. I worked at a university and one of my jobs was dealing with accommodation requests. We received a significant number of requests that were highly suspect. But we almost never rejected the request (assuming they had the minimal paperwork) and it was even rare for us to ask for a neutral evaluation.

It just wasn't worth it. We would incur significant expenses and hassle and invite the prospect of a lawsuit.

We all recognize the problem on a macro level that it creates a tremendous incentive to cheat and that it was unfair to others, but on a micro level we couldn't justify disputing all but the most egregious cases.

(To be clear, some of the increase is better diagnosis, but a lot of it isn't.)


This post is telling the real story. There is no push back from colleges and universities against a flood of people requesting disabilities on questionable grounds. Also, parents these days want their kids to have it as easy as possible. Gone are the days when it was considered character building to have to tough it out yourself. Of course, there are students with genuine disabilities who should be accommodated, no one is arguing against that. The rampant cheating of the system hurts these kids though because most reasonable and ethical people are cynical about the accommodations especially the extra time on SAT and ACT.


About 7.5% of SAT test takers receive accommodations. That is lower than the percentage of students in H.S. who receive accommodations. Whatever cheating is occurring can hardly be called "rampant".

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I find it strange that the student form asks- "What accommodations do you need?" Shouldn't this be to the judgement of the professional solely? If the student form is the primary way accommodations are assigned, the potential for abuse is significant.

A further look at "tips for accommodations" gives far too much leverage, IMO, for students to create accommodations as they WANT rather than as they NEED (or as is reasonable). https://www.pomona.edu/accessibility/student-accessibility/accommodation-services/how-make-most-your-academic-accommodations...

Not really, everyone has a different mix of strengths and weaknesses and different accommodations do better with different people. By the time a student reaches college, they usually have an idea of what works for them, at least my DC did. Just because two students have the same diagnosis does not necessarily mean that it manifests the same in both students. There are spectrums of variation in each diagnosis and many different combinations of co-morbid issues. My DC is not at Pomona, but he has almost the same accommodations in college as he received in HS. The list shown for Pomona looks like a general boilerplate of what should be done in all colleges and universities to comply with ADA. That said, I have no experience with emotional support animals.

+1 to the PP's response to the question. To the PP who asked the question, think of it this way. Reasonable vs. unreasonable aside (surely the college should make the call), the student is being asked to take responsibility for his/her own learning. Down to being able to name the details of how they plan to learn, and in which class. For many students with disabilities, and for several researched and documented reasons, self-advocacy is already hard. Harder than for the average student. But in an age of helicopter parenting, we should all welcome putting this burden onto the student.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Truly - what is the harm of accommodations? What is one single example of an accommodated kid gaining an unfair advantage? I am asking this and my kids are accommodation free. These kids may not fit into the box they are dealt with but this has nothing to do with intellect, ideas or ability to innovate. Sure - perhaps there are some careers where they may not be properly suited but that’s between them and their employer.


Obviously, with more time they could out-perform their peers who have to stick to the time limit.


Agree SATs and ACTs are as much a test of getting through all the questions within the time limits as a test of skills/ability. If one kid has say 45 seconds to work out a math problem, it is harder to get it right than if they have 90-120 seconds per question. When there's a strict time limit, many kids don't have the luxury of double checking answers. I think a lot of test prep is to teach kids how to zero in on the right answer, dismissing clearly wrong answers, as quickly as possible. It must also be more comfortable writing the SAT essay when you've got double the time to think and plan.


You don't get it. It takes the ADHD/ADD/anxiety/EF disabled student longer to do the same work, so 45 seconds for a non-disabled student = 90-120 seconds for a disabled student. There is no advantage, only a levelled playing field. There is no extra double-checking of answers. It takes the disabled student the entire period to simply get through the test! There is no extra time to plan an essay response. It takes that long just to decide what to write and write it! Some of you need to study up on this type of disability rather than impulsively responding. -Mom of ADD DD who barely squeaked by HS -- even with so-called "extras."


I think YOU don't get it. Standardized tests are build to test processing speed and working memory, in part. They're not designed to test content knowledge and creativity. It would be laughably backwards to argue that a kid should get longer on tests because he is "disabled" due to his reduced executive functioning ability.

Now, a much better argument is that schools and colleges should design evaluations and courses that give more kinds of options to different kinds of learners. That, I agree with. But standardized tests measure processing speed, period.


You are ignorant person. Psychological tests measure processing speed, not ACT or SAT.
My child has slow processing speed and low working memory. But my child with support is finishing MS magnet and will go to HS magnet next year.
Should my child not go to college? There is no way my child will take SAT or ACT without extended time... No way of any college, even CC without accommodations.
However, you have to know what kind of solutions and approaches child uses when solving some problems. I periodically literally open my mouth. I can't do it that way even with several advanced degrees and no LD. He just thinks differently.
No any single person who works with my child ever question that he belong where he is .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If anyone was curious about what disability accommodations look like specifically from Pomona: https://www.pomona.edu/accessibility/student-accessibility/accommodation-services


Test-Taking Accommodations
50% or 100% additional time on traditional tests
Quiet location for testing
Computer test reader
Dragon Naturally Speaking as a test writing resource
Use of computer to type essay exams
Assistive technology for exams or for course work
Spelling and punctuation considerations on exams
Classroom Accommodations
Notes or course notes
Permission to record the course lecture
Preferential seating
Course handouts in an enlarged font
Course handouts in an electronic format
Use of service animal in the classroom
Assistive technology in classroom

Mobility Accommodations
Relocating classrooms, lab, field trips and living spaces in accessible locations.
Pomona Medical Supply will provide carts and mobility devices.
Foreign Language Exemption
All exemptions are processed through the Academic Procedure Committee. Contact the Associate Dean of Students to assist with this process.

Emotional Support Animals
To obtain permission to have an emotional support animal on campus, review the pets in residence hall policy and have the medical professional complete the emotional support animal application form. Once that is completed, contact the Dean of Students Office to secure permission to have an emotional support animal on campus.

Housing Accommodations
Please contact the Dean of Students Office to secure permission to have an air conditioner or single room.


Here is the form students fill out: https://www.pomona.edu/sites/default/files/disability-request-for-services.pdf and the one professionals do: https://www.pomona.edu/sites/default/files/disability-documentation-form.pdf

I find it strange that the student form asks- "What accommodations do you need?" Shouldn't this be to the judgement of the professional solely? If the student form is the primary way accommodations are assigned, the potential for abuse is significant.

A further look at "tips for accommodations" gives far too much leverage, IMO, for students to create accommodations as they WANT rather than as they NEED (or as is reasonable). https://www.pomona.edu/accessibility/student-accessibility/accommodation-services/how-make-most-your-academic-accommodations

Pomona's Common Data Set states that 94% of entering students ranked in the top 10% of their high school class. Their profile states 27% of enrolled students ranked valedictorian. Pomona seems to bend over backwards to accommodate students that I could not imagine happening at any high school. Those students clearly thrived academically- most without needing accommodations in the first place. They're not suddenly going to come into college unable to handle the lifestyle or workload. The reality is that Pomona needs to take a long hard look on the ease which it allows accommodations and ensure that the students who genuinely need them are getting the bulk of the resources.


The free "market" will sort all this out by declining to hire Pomona grads, then smart students and their parents will revolt and demand standards. Smart students won't allow the devaluation of their hard won credential (the diploma) by the allowance of practices (e.g. excessive accommodation) that are not respected by prospective employers. The same problem afflicts POC who are the beneficiaries of affirmative action - people rationally question whether a POC doctor is capable or a beneficiary of "special accommodations". Of course there are many capable and even brilliant POC doctors (e.g. Ben Carson) but their achievement is called into question by the practices of affirmative action. Meet the standard, don't lower it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You are exactly right.

The other responders are in fact ignorant, and lucky that they have not had to learn the hard way that these disabilities are real (despite the fact that they are invisible).

Careful snarky posters, karma might be real...


I don't think people mind when the disabilities are real. They do mind that there is abuse of the system.

They don't mind when a blind person has a guide dog or someone with PTSD from service in Afghanistan has emotional support dog.

They do mind when someone spends $50 for a fake emotional support certificate to take their pet ferret (or camel) on the plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz8bqJaKeKk

or rich parents spending thousands for a fake diagnosis so that their kid gets extra time on the SATs https://www.thedailybeast.com/faking-adhd-gets-you-into-harvard

or college students fake ADHD to get Adderall. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mouse-man/201007/new-study-claims-it-is-easy-fake-adhd

As long as these things are allowed to occur, it undermines the case of people with real needs.



Except in this thread we have people telling those with disabled to go find their "niche" [that isn't in college]. We have lots of shaming language directed towards anyone who uses and accommodation, including calling them disgraceful. Your starting assumption is that you should be arbiter of what constitutes a "real" disability.

You want to focus on abuse of the system yet until very recently people with very disabilities were unable to get reasonable accommodations. Children with learning disabilities are still left unidentified and failed out of school. Children with identified learning disabilities are still not provided with scientifically backed learning methods and then called "lazy" or a "behavioral problem" when they still don't catch up when provided with more of the same methods that don't work. You only care about abuse of the system because it doesn't affect you at all that bright kids with a lot of potential are short changed. Personally, I'm delighted to know a pair of brothers with ADHD and dyslexia who are doing great in the engineering program at their chosen university. What's even more marvelous for me is out confident they are in themselves that they can talk about their challenges and how they overcome them without the shame people like you want to place on them.



Guess what. I have a child with a legitimate IEP, and I think that inflated disability claims do NOTHING to help him. It only makes people more skeptical of disability rights in general.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: