I agree! Went to a public school in NJ that was also town-based. So much different and more efficient than the ridiculously large county based MCPS system. |
You have enough money to start an entire private school with small classes for your kid. But the public schools apparently don’t. Or, maybe it’s the teachers unions fault for insisting that small class sizes are a bad thing because there aren’t enough ‘qualified teachers’ to be hired. But the special kids have a right to a mainstream classroom just like your kid does. Demanding that certain kids leave your child’s classroom is incredibly entitled. It’s the pinnacle tippy top of entitlement. Many of us pay taxes all of our lives and never send a child through the public school system. Just because you ‘pay taxes’ doesn’t give you the right to demand much of anything except for your child’s free education as it is offered to him. |
+1000 Public schools run by towns or cities are better at teaching (curriculum, spending, community, fewer disparate interests) than large counties like La, MOCo, etc. Central office is just in a social justice power trip at most of these large county places. And would never cut it at a private school or charter school where one is held accountable. |
I thought she moved away from the DMV, but is not telling us where for some odd reason. In most of Florida you have to go private. Austin TX has awesome public’s. |
Except for schools run by towns or cities that are not good... Size isn't the issue. Demographics is the issue. |
You just can't make that as a blanket statement. It's simply not true. There are good small school districts, and bad small school districts. Wealthy small school districts tend to be very good. Working class or poor small school districts tend to struggle. Allegheny County in Pennsylvania has 42 separate school districts. Forty two separate administrations, superintendents, budgets, labor agreements, curricula, etc. Three, maybe up to five of them are excellent, among the best in the state and competitive nationally. A lot are fine. Some are not. |
| Most kids won’t learn much no matter how much money you take from the other side of town |
|
I don’t know OP. But I do know that 1) school is not real life and 2) the goal of all parents should be to raise well adjusted future adults. I would worry about pressure and early sophistication, but then again, I can’t afford schools like that.
https://www.amazon.com/How-Raise-Adult-Overparenting-Prepare/dp/1250093635 |
No thank you That's college for us. If you're an involved parent in decent public cluster, your kid will do fine. We have friends in debt - hundreds of thousands now - b/c they insisted on private for their kid. (She switched twice b/c the first private wasn't a good fit.) I can't see spending that much, and we are doing OK with our two-income HH. |
this is precisely why i didn't want my kids in the private school. it's a school, not a resort. they don't need any of those facilities. |
Fireplaces in the library, sure, that’s unnecessary. But you think they don’t need a science lab, gym, or spaces to learn art and music? |
| Private schools cherry pick and are exclusive. They were not an option for my children. |
My guess is that if OP gave us the locations, her story will fall apart. It's easier to generalize but no specific details to back it up. |
Fall apart how? What on earth would I gain by making up such a thing? I have no interest in turning this thread into a pissing contest between which private school is best. |
|
You could at least say the region. dC has tons of transplants from all over, many of whom could do an educated cost/benefit for you. Doing this silly mystery thing where all you discuss is the college-like campus doesn’t help much.
You want a school where a majority of kids are aiming for Ivy League. Working alongside those kids will bring up everyone else. Going to a private that’s half trust fund kids and half there so they don’t-get-in-trouble types that all go trin trin is not. |