I am a physically fit, health conscious guy and I only find chubby/curvy women attractive

[Anonymous]

Most hetero men are naturally more attracted to a slightly bigger woman (Not overweight but with larger breasts and hips etc.) However, really skinny women look better in clothes and often dress for other women so it becomes a status thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Curvy does not mean overweight or obese. It refers to a woman with a certain type of body proportions- the waist is smaller than the bust and hips by 8 inches or more. So a thin woman can be curvy if her body has these proportions.

For example, Marilyn Monroe (35" bust/22" waist/35" hips) was a curvy woman because her waist was 13" smaller than her bust and hips. She was 5'5" and 120 lbs so not overweight or obese. She was statistically average for a woman of her height and build. She was only a size 12 by 1950 standards. By modern standards, she would be a size 4, maybe 6 at most.

+1

i.e.: Woman-Like. Nothing wrong with that, it makes perfect sense. I too (as PP mentioned), notice that straight men like curves (again, doesn't mean fat, just not "straight up and down" figure).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

Uh huh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you Latino? Latino men like curves - no stick thin, pre-pubescent looking women who could pass for 12 year old boys.

Yep, so do black men. I've always felt like white women are the only ones who feel pressured to be thin.

I was born to the wrong culture. Sigh.

Curves is one thing.

50-100 pounds of fat is another.

I'm afraid we are mixing things.

Not one extreme or the other. There is a current fad of more women being runners, to the point of being waif thin, and not looking healthy, at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curvy does not mean overweight or obese. It refers to a woman with a certain type of body proportions- the waist is smaller than the bust and hips by 8 inches or more. So a thin woman can be curvy if her body has these proportions.

For example, Marilyn Monroe (35" bust/22" waist/35" hips) was a curvy woman because her waist was 13" smaller than her bust and hips. She was 5'5" and 120 lbs so not overweight or obese. She was statistically average for a woman of her height and build. She was only a size 12 by 1950 standards. By modern standards, she would be a size 4, maybe 6 at most.

5'5" and 120lbs is just about perfect.

+1.

Now, same height and 160lbs is just fat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

Uh huh.

It must be really hard to be so narrow-minded as you are. Truly. To think that everyone must conform to limited standards of beauty and attractiveness--that must suck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curvy does not mean overweight or obese. It refers to a woman with a certain type of body proportions- the waist is smaller than the bust and hips by 8 inches or more. So a thin woman can be curvy if her body has these proportions.

For example, Marilyn Monroe (35" bust/22" waist/35" hips) was a curvy woman because her waist was 13" smaller than her bust and hips. She was 5'5" and 120 lbs so not overweight or obese. She was statistically average for a woman of her height and build. She was only a size 12 by 1950 standards. By modern standards, she would be a size 4, maybe 6 at most.

5'5" and 120lbs is just about perfect.

+1.

Now, same height and 160lbs is just fat.

Really, because I’m a size 10 at 5’5 160 and wouldn’t consider myself “fat.” Chubby, absolutely, but I don’t have rolls, cankles, whatever else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

Uh huh.

5'8 is tall for a woman. Depending on her build and how she carried the weight, 170 could've worked for her. Ashley Graham is 5'9 and 170 lbs. She looks great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curvy does not mean overweight or obese. It refers to a woman with a certain type of body proportions- the waist is smaller than the bust and hips by 8 inches or more. So a thin woman can be curvy if her body has these proportions.

For example, Marilyn Monroe (35" bust/22" waist/35" hips) was a curvy woman because her waist was 13" smaller than her bust and hips. She was 5'5" and 120 lbs so not overweight or obese. She was statistically average for a woman of her height and build. She was only a size 12 by 1950 standards. By modern standards, she would be a size 4, maybe 6 at most.

5'5" and 120lbs is just about perfect.

+1.

Now, same height and 160lbs is just fat.

Really, because I’m a size 10 at 5’5 160 and wouldn’t consider myself “fat.” Chubby, absolutely, but I don’t have rolls, cankles, whatever else.

OK, so let's define words

What's chubby, fat, obese to you?

To me, fat includes chubby. But I guess you use the word in a narrower sense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

That is more than what DH weighed when he rowed crew in college and he is 5'10". Most of his male crewmates weighed under 170 and this was for lightweight male crew team.

[Anonymous]

I think that chart is for men not women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dad is exactly like this. Always fit and trim, even now that he’s in his late 60s. All his girlfriends before my mom, and my mom as well, have been the equivalent of a size 8-10. I’m pretty thin and petite (size 0 - 2) and he’s always said I was too skinny and looked like a little boy. ?

Your dad sounds like an asshole

Well 0-2 is pretty much anorexic with zero chest unless she got implants....so he's right.

You poor fatty has an unfortunate warped sense of reality.

Anyone smaller than you are too skinny. Size 0-2 cloyhes in today's stores are 4-6 in the past.

TIL my 5'2" 118lb wife is anorexic.

Anything it takes to make the fattys feel good.

women who fit size 0-2 ALSO fit into LITTLE GIRLS clothes...chest size of 32 in = elementary school girls..NO THANKS, NOT sexy