Was it appropriate for Obama to actively investigate presidential campaign during election

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Good grief, that's entirely plausible. Let's waste years of productivity and billions of taxpayer dollars investigating a previous administration rather than the current one.

Meanwhile, jobs and health care are on interminable hold. Win-win!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Good grief, that's entirely plausible. Let's waste years of productivity and billions of taxpayer dollars investigating a previous administration rather than the current one.

Meanwhile, jobs and health care are on interminable hold. Win-win!

What are you even talking about? Obama totally fixed health care! And he also fixed the unemployment rate!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Warrantless wiretapping is even more serious if proven to be true. Clapper is in the thick of the whole plot.

Congress needs to subpoena WH daily intelligence report from last year to see Obama's involvement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Warrantless wiretapping is even more serious if proven to be true. Clapper is in the thick of the whole plot.

Congress needs to subpoena WH daily intelligence report from last year to see Obama's involvement.

The point is, there is no proof whatsoever that there has been any wiretapping at all. So how do you prove a negative? This is a baseless distraction that the Trumpers are eating up. Weak minds and all. The President was unequivocal in his assertion that the Obama had tapped his phones. Where is the proof of this? Maybe let's start with that.

[Anonymous]

Right - amazing how the Trump supporters have run all half cocked without actually having any facts.


Just because Trump said something does not mean it's fact. After all, in his address to the joint session of Congress he made 61 statements of which 51 turned out to contain falsehoods.

If Trump said something it's more likely to be false than true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Warrantless wiretapping is even more serious if proven to be true. Clapper is in the thick of the whole plot.

Congress needs to subpoena WH daily intelligence report from last year to see Obama's involvement.

The point is, there is no proof whatsoever that there has been any wiretapping at all. So how do you prove a negative? This is a baseless distraction that the Trumpers are eating up. Weak minds and all. The President was unequivocal in his assertion that the Obama had tapped his phones. Where is the proof of this? Maybe let's start with that.

This appears to be the same line of defense for Obama on all major networks. But they didn't ask for any hard evidence when they started the witch hunt on Trump and his associates.

It's not that hard to prove the existence of wiretapping. Obama didn't even deny that yesterday. Congress can start from the intelligence leaks some of which were intercept content. They can also look over the WH daily intelligence report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Warrantless wiretapping is even more serious if proven to be true. Clapper is in the thick of the whole plot.

Congress needs to subpoena WH daily intelligence report from last year to see Obama's involvement.

The point is, there is no proof whatsoever that there has been any wiretapping at all. So how do you prove a negative? This is a baseless distraction that the Trumpers are eating up. Weak minds and all. The President was unequivocal in his assertion that the Obama had tapped his phones. Where is the proof of this? Maybe let's start with that.

THERE. IS. NONE. ZILCH. NADA. That's why the WH is trying to shut this down by refusing to comment on the record. Trump is an embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

We plainly need to waterboard Trump to get to the bottom of all of this.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

This appears to be the same line of defense for Obama on all major networks. But they didn't ask for any hard evidence when they started the witch hunt on Trump and his associates.

It's not that hard to prove the existence of wiretapping. Obama didn't even deny that yesterday. Congress can start from the intelligence leaks some of which were intercept content. They can also look over the WH daily intelligence report.

From Jon Favreau on Twitter:

Barack Obama's master plan:
1) Wiretap the opposition
2) Gather damaging info
3) Say nothing
4) Let him win
5) Ride off into the sunset

I'm sure this plan makes sense to you PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We plainly need to waterboard Trump to get to the bottom of all of this.

I heard it works very well

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This appears to be the same line of defense for Obama on all major networks. But they didn't ask for any hard evidence when they started the witch hunt on Trump and his associates.

It's not that hard to prove the existence of wiretapping. Obama didn't even deny that yesterday. Congress can start from the intelligence leaks some of which were intercept content. They can also look over the WH daily intelligence report.

From Jon Favreau on Twitter:

Barack Obama's master plan:
1) Wiretap the opposition
2) Gather damaging info
3) Say nothing
4) Let him win
5) Ride off into the sunset

I'm sure this plan makes sense to you PP.

The plan encountered a problem in step 3) -- he didn't find anything -- and there was nothing substantial to say.

Still the media continued to drum up the false narrative. But the voters didn't buy it, and 4) voters let him win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Warrantless wiretapping is even more serious if proven to be true. Clapper is in the thick of the whole plot.

Congress needs to subpoena WH daily intelligence report from last year to see Obama's involvement.

The point is, there is no proof whatsoever that there has been any wiretapping at all. So how do you prove a negative? This is a baseless distraction that the Trumpers are eating up. Weak minds and all. The President was unequivocal in his assertion that the Obama had tapped his phones. Where is the proof of this? Maybe let's start with that.

Do you trust NY Times?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Warrantless wiretapping is even more serious if proven to be true. Clapper is in the thick of the whole plot.

Congress needs to subpoena WH daily intelligence report from last year to see Obama's involvement.

The point is, there is no proof whatsoever that there has been any wiretapping at all. So how do you prove a negative? This is a baseless distraction that the Trumpers are eating up. Weak minds and all. The President was unequivocal in his assertion that the Obama had tapped his phones. Where is the proof of this? Maybe let's start with that.

Do you trust NY Times?

Thank you comrade. Did you read the entire article before pulling out your trusty red marker? Also, as you know, the US was conducting signal intercept operations against your corrupt, murderous leadership. Now go finish your bottle of cheap-ass vodka.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This appears to be the same line of defense for Obama on all major networks. But they didn't ask for any hard evidence when they started the witch hunt on Trump and his associates.

It's not that hard to prove the existence of wiretapping. Obama didn't even deny that yesterday. Congress can start from the intelligence leaks some of which were intercept content. They can also look over the WH daily intelligence report.

From Jon Favreau on Twitter:

Barack Obama's master plan:
1) Wiretap the opposition
2) Gather damaging info
3) Say nothing
4) Let him win
5) Ride off into the sunset

I'm sure this plan makes sense to you PP.

Actually LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Clapper this morning, to his knowledge, there was no FISA warrant to tap Trump. As such, either he is making it up, or Obama did something illegal. Where is there proof that there was any tapping at all?

Are they going to do endless investigations into the previous administration to undermine the IC? Because there otherwise would be no reason for this.

The same committees who brought on the endless Benghazi hearings would then be in charge of endless hearings illustrating the failure of the national security and law enforcement communities, while portraying Trump as a victim and this consolidating his power.

Jeez, this is nefarious.

Warrantless wiretapping is even more serious if proven to be true. Clapper is in the thick of the whole plot.

Congress needs to subpoena WH daily intelligence report from last year to see Obama's involvement.

The point is, there is no proof whatsoever that there has been any wiretapping at all. So how do you prove a negative? This is a baseless distraction that the Trumpers are eating up. Weak minds and all. The President was unequivocal in his assertion that the Obama had tapped his phones. Where is the proof of this? Maybe let's start with that.

Do you trust NY Times?

Look at those shoes! Ouch.