Was it appropriate for Obama to actively investigate presidential campaign during election

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes it's appropriate. Also appropriate for The President to now investigate BHO and his associates for sedition, espionage--deliberately lowering classifications on intelligence material to increase circulation thus causing grave harm to us capabilities, and collusion with foreign powers to weaken the US. Guess who's taking a warrant request to the FISA court now?

No investigation necessary. Either there is evidence, which he has access to, or he doesn't. Produce the evidence if it is true.

This is my thinking on this idea.......
If Trump himself produced evidence, the left would scream that it is manufactured, altered, fabricated, or otherwise false. In other words, you would not believe anything he shared. So, it is best to let others uncover and produce the evidence.

[Anonymous]

If only there were independent intelligence agencies who could corroburate evidence supplied by the executive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is Trump's proof of anything he says?

The NYT ran the wiretapping story before the election. Did they lie?

Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager Robby Mook helped bolster President Donald Trump’s accusation of wiretapping.

And apparently he knows more than a private citizen ought to about what was found.

Mook appeared on “Fox & Friends” on Tuesday and admitted that he had known about wiretaps.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/03/07/hillary-campaign-manager-admits-wiretaps-lets-slip-knows-probably-456286

[Anonymous]

And if it was requested by the FBI and sanctioned by a court because of contacts with Russia, how does that help Trump? Doesn't it seem like he would be tying his own noose?

[Anonymous]

Ok, here is the proof.

https://www.infowars.com/former-intel-officer-ex-nsa-officials-carried-out-dnc-hack-to-expose-hillary/


Left without comment.

Ok one comment: Alex Jones.