CMI vs YY for PK3?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LEA is Local Education Agency - essentially its own school district so the school must accommodate anyone who gets through the lottery (unlike DCPS which can send you to a different school for different, particular need).

The term LEA is often referred to in special education/ in IEPs. DCPS, as you may know, has a crappy record with special education (to say the least). So joining all charters into one LEA would take away charters' abilities to administer their own special ed programs. And as a parent of a kid with an IEP at an immersion charter, I would fight tooth and nail against that. Don't want to be part of DCPS/ OSSE-wide special ed.


Right, so there's a quality-of-special-ed-programs dimension to the single lottery system underpinning DC charter admissions, stemming from the LEA arrangement specific to this municipality. While parents like you appreciate the autonomy the law affords charters in the provision of special ed services, the autonomy doesn't extend to charters establishing the language dominant lotteries DCPS uses to create dual-immersion programs. The law is, thus, a double-edged sword in promoting educational best practices. It goes so far as to prevent immersion charters from replacing upper grades drop-outs with native speakers who would enhance program quality for all students.

What from what you're saying, it sounds like states whose charter laws support screening of students can freely establish multiple lotteries to a single school. This is something I've never understood when YY parents argue that their program is at the mercy of "federal charter law" in its inability to enroll more than a tiny number of bilingual Chinese-speaking children.

Do you see a loophole in the LEA set up DC immersion charters could exploit to recruit native speakers in larger numbers without pushing the envelope on breaking charter law, or way the law could be revised to do this? Would a change in the law necessarily jeopardize the charters' ability to administer their own special ed programs? Is there no smart way to safeguard a good policy while jettisoning a myopic one? I know that LAMB's been in hot water with DCPC various times for creatively giving preferential treatment in admissions to Spanish-speaking students. DCPC argues that LAMB is breaking federal charter law. LAMB argues that it can't fulfill its mission responsibly without enrolling and retaining many bilingual children. The conversation goes nowhere.

Friends who've bailed from Tyler Spanish Immersion, LAMB and Mundo Verde for Oyster have convinced me that dual-immersion is not just a worthy goal, it's the only approach that works in teaching little kids from homes without native speakers to really speak languages. The truth is that YY parents on these threads decry "Tiger parents" slamming their kids' weak Mandarin without arguing for what's in their interest.


As I understand it, the difference between DC and other local school districts (such as the Western MA one mentioned upthread) is that Congress passed the School Reform Act, which established charters in the District. http://focusdc.org/history

So it's the problems associated with that.

I think the only way the LEAs could change the charter school law is to band together to require preference for native speakers. I know YY tried that in the past, by itself, and failed, even though there's a much smaller pool of Chinese speakers in the District than Spanish speakers, for example.

The only reason I brought up special ed administration was that someone (maybe you) suggested that a multi-charter school LEA (as I think may be common in other states, though DC is the only place where I have experience) could change the situation for attracting native speakers for the better. The Western Mass Chinese immersion school that someone mentioned upthread is open to all Massachusetts residents: http://www.pvcics.org/enrollment I don't know how they accomplish that, but here, to expand the pool of Chinese speakers, you'd have to open it up to MD and VA residents (somehow...with those governments paying I suppose). I don't know how to accomplish that. With the District involved, plus two states, it's far more complicated jurisdiction-wise than in Mass. But I agree it would be much better if YY could somehow have a larger pool of native/ near-native speakers (ABCs).


I see what you're saying, but YY could attract many more native speakers from DC simply by adding a language dominant lottery, and taking page from the way MoCo manages its two Mandarin immersion programs. Our dialect-speaking friends in DC avoid the YY lottery and DCI (they buy houses in Upper NW).

MoCo hires dialect-speaking administrators to run its Mandarin programs partly for their ability to do outreach to the heritage community. Admins are ABCs who speak good Cantonese and Mandarin. Technically, a kid testing in to replace a drop-out has to get through an admissions interview in Mandarin. Actually, Chinese parents know that any major dialect will do, because admins understand that a dialect-speaking kid can catch up in the basic Mandarin taught in a matter of months, then soar ahead, boosting standards for Chinese.

Also, MoCo uses pullout groups to transition kids from other dialects to Mandarin. Native speakers really like this, motivating them to come. YY could set up pullout groups easily, because many of their teachers speak Cantonese (unbeknownst to most parents). In the Bay Area, several Mandarin immersion schools are so determined to attract native speakers that they teach all the kids Cantonese until 2nd grade - it's a sharp recruitment tool that gets the local Chinese community on board. All the kids are then transitioned from Cantonese to Mandarin in 3rd grade, and by middle school, almost every student's Mandarin is impressive. My cousin, who sends his kid to one of these programs, reports that hiring au pairs and tutors is uncommon in his school community.

I know that the Amherst founders sent study teams to both MoCo and San Fran before hiring admins, developing a curriculum, and advertising the school in the local community. A college friend is an administrator there.



That's all good stuff, but it's not 'simple' to add a language-dominant lottery in DC. It's not a preference a DC charter can offer. YY has lobbied for it. LAMB did it for years, but was busted, and no longer does it (with resulting change in demographics). It doesn't seem to be a preference the charter board is willing to consider...perhaps if all the immersion charter schools banded together, with stats from other districts that allow this, they might have a chance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A: Our kid's Chinese is great!

B: It's not. It sucks. My kids and I laugh about it.

A: Our neighbor is Chinese and she said it's excellent.

B: I lied about that.

A: But she gets A's and the teacher says she's doing fine!

B: The teacher lied.

A: The tutor says her tones are good.

B: Yeah, they lied, too.


A: ...

B: We're polite that way.


A (in Mandarin): Hey, kiddo, hey neighbor, how are things going for you at YY these days? What grade are you in this year?

B (in Mandarin): I am good.

A: I heard you went on a trip to China recently with your whole class. What did you see there? What did you do?

B: We went to China.

A: Did you visit the Forbidden City and the Terracotta Army? Did you ride on trains, take boats, take hikes, eat out, stay with a host family?

B: We ate apples.

A: Wow, what a fantastic trip you must have had. How wonderful for you. Your Chinese is so good now.

B: Thank you.


My kid doesn't go to YY and could speak that much Mandarin.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Nope. I have lived in this country (major cities only) my entire life, and I have never witnessed the routine physical aggression that I have witnessed on every trip to China. I don't hate Chinese people, but you are certainly a shameless apologist for this aggressive behavior. Now, we can get back on topic.


Just to follow your posts a minute, you live in the US, went to visit China, got pushed and think all Chinese people are rude.

Um. Ok.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A: Our kid's Chinese is great!

B: It's not. It sucks. My kids and I laugh about it.

A: Our neighbor is Chinese and she said it's excellent.

B: I lied about that.

A: But she gets A's and the teacher says she's doing fine!

B: The teacher lied.

A: The tutor says her tones are good.

B: Yeah, they lied, too.


A: ...

B: We're polite that way.


A (in Mandarin): Hey, kiddo, hey neighbor, how are things going for you at YY these days? What grade are you in this year?

B (in Mandarin): I am good.

A: I heard you went on a trip to China recently with your whole class. What did you see there? What did you do?

B: We went to China.

A: Did you visit the Forbidden City and the Terracotta Army? Did you ride on trains, take boats, take hikes, eat out, stay with a host family?

B: We ate apples.

A: Wow, what a fantastic trip you must have had. How wonderful for you. Your Chinese is so good now.

B: Thank you.


The first one is very funny. The second one sounds like my oldest son in English when adults talk to him


Yea, but your kid can say what he wants in English, when he feels like it. YY students are actually taught a lot of Chinese words they can't use because they don't practice speaking much. My bilingual first grader does no better than I do in speaking to YY kids.


He can say what he wants in Chinese, too. He just hates talking to adults and sounds stilted and strange in any language. He is awkward, and so was his host brother who came from China to visit us. I'm happy that my son and his host brother are learning, even if they are both awkward and weird. I don't judge people's children who don't play competitive level sports like mine do, or play instruments, or aren't handsome, or whatever other measurements people have in their heads. Live and let live.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nope. I have lived in this country (major cities only) my entire life, and I have never witnessed the routine physical aggression that I have witnessed on every trip to China. I don't hate Chinese people, but you are certainly a shameless apologist for this aggressive behavior. Now, we can get back on topic.


Just to follow your posts a minute, you live in the US, went to visit China, got pushed and think all Chinese people are rude.

Um. Ok.


I live in the U.S. and I have traveled to China for (mostly) work and vacation many times (well over two dozen trips).

Based on your comment, you have never traveled to China. Um...Ok.
Anonymous
That's all good stuff, but it's not 'simple' to add a language-dominant lottery in DC. It's not a preference a DC charter can offer. YY has lobbied for it. LAMB did it for years, but was busted, and no longer does it (with resulting change in demographics). It doesn't seem to be a preference the charter board is willing to consider...perhaps if all the immersion charter schools banded together, with stats from other districts that allow this, they might have a chance.

I didn't say it would be simple, not after many years living in DC, but I'm not clear why DCPC keeps blocking a development running contrary to best practices on an epic scale. Even turgid, barely competent DCPS embraces, celebrates and builds dual immersion programs. If they want to recruit low SES Chinese speakers, they're there for the taking in the fast food community around town. I'm not abandoning hope that the schools will do the research and band together eventually.

It's funny, YY parents fend off native speakers on these threads, rather than seeing them as a resource to harness out of self interest. By contrast, when YY parents hear my kids speaking Chinese around the neighborhood (too often bickering, bragging, whining or complaining), they often want to engage. They ask for tips on how to get their own kids to speak like that. I tell them my children's Chinese is just average for students in our heritage school. We like talking to YY families.

Too bad that DCUM often brings out the worst in parents.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A: Our kid's Chinese is great!

B: It's not. It sucks. My kids and I laugh about it.

A: Our neighbor is Chinese and she said it's excellent.

B: I lied about that.

A: But she gets A's and the teacher says she's doing fine!

B: The teacher lied.

A: The tutor says her tones are good.

B: Yeah, they lied, too.


A: ...

B: We're polite that way.


A (in Mandarin): Hey, kiddo, hey neighbor, how are things going for you at YY these days? What grade are you in this year?

B (in Mandarin): I am good.

A: I heard you went on a trip to China recently with your whole class. What did you see there? What did you do?

B: We went to China.

A: Did you visit the Forbidden City and the Terracotta Army? Did you ride on trains, take boats, take hikes, eat out, stay with a host family?

B: We ate apples.

A: Wow, what a fantastic trip you must have had. How wonderful for you. Your Chinese is so good now.

B: Thank you.


The first one is very funny. The second one sounds like my oldest son in English when adults talk to him


Yea, but your kid can say what he wants in English, when he feels like it. YY students are actually taught a lot of Chinese words they can't use because they don't practice speaking much. My bilingual first grader does no better than I do in speaking to YY kids.


He can say what he wants in Chinese, too. He just hates talking to adults and sounds stilted and strange in any language. He is awkward, and so was his host brother who came from China to visit us. I'm happy that my son and his host brother are learning, even if they are both awkward and weird. I don't judge people's children who don't play competitive level sports like mine do, or play instruments, or aren't handsome, or whatever other measurements people have in their heads. Live and let live.


Not buying it, unless you've been hosting Chinese-speaking au pairs since before the boy learned to walk. I've volunteered at YY. I could hardly find a fully bilingual kid there of any age, among scores. I'm not judging anyone's children, it's the model that's flawed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nope. I have lived in this country (major cities only) my entire life, and I have never witnessed the routine physical aggression that I have witnessed on every trip to China. I don't hate Chinese people, but you are certainly a shameless apologist for this aggressive behavior. Now, we can get back on topic.


Just to follow your posts a minute, you live in the US, went to visit China, got pushed and think all Chinese people are rude.

Um. Ok.


I live in the U.S. and I have traveled to China for (mostly) work and vacation many times (well over two dozen trips).

Based on your comment, you have never traveled to China. Um...Ok.


2 whole dozen trips? Wow. You sound like an expert.

I love how people are making assumptions of a population of 1.3 billion. There are so many ethnicities and cultures. But yeah, you went for work to a major city and saw the summer palace so you can speak about the entire country. Please.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nope. I have lived in this country (major cities only) my entire life, and I have never witnessed the routine physical aggression that I have witnessed on every trip to China. I don't hate Chinese people, but you are certainly a shameless apologist for this aggressive behavior. Now, we can get back on topic.


Just to follow your posts a minute, you live in the US, went to visit China, got pushed and think all Chinese people are rude.

Um. Ok.


I live in the U.S. and I have traveled to China for (mostly) work and vacation many times (well over two dozen trips).

Based on your comment, you have never traveled to China. Um...Ok.


2 whole dozen trips? Wow. You sound like an expert.

I love how people are making assumptions of a population of 1.3 billion. There are so many ethnicities and cultures. But yeah, you went for work to a major city and saw the summer palace so you can speak about the entire country. Please.


You sound like someone who has no idea that opinions are largely informed by experience. You also sound like you don't travel much. Bless your heart.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nope. I have lived in this country (major cities only) my entire life, and I have never witnessed the routine physical aggression that I have witnessed on every trip to China. I don't hate Chinese people, but you are certainly a shameless apologist for this aggressive behavior. Now, we can get back on topic.


Just to follow your posts a minute, you live in the US, went to visit China, got pushed and think all Chinese people are rude.

Um. Ok.


I live in the U.S. and I have traveled to China for (mostly) work and vacation many times (well over two dozen trips).

Based on your comment, you have never traveled to China. Um...Ok.


2 whole dozen trips? Wow. You sound like an expert.

I love how people are making assumptions of a population of 1.3 billion. There are so many ethnicities and cultures. But yeah, you went for work to a major city and saw the summer palace so you can speak about the entire country. Please.


You sound like someone who has no idea that opinions are largely informed by experience. You also sound like you don't travel much. Bless your heart.


you realize you are arguing with multiple people right?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A: Our kid's Chinese is great!

B: It's not. It sucks. My kids and I laugh about it.

A: Our neighbor is Chinese and she said it's excellent.

B: I lied about that.

A: But she gets A's and the teacher says she's doing fine!

B: The teacher lied.

A: The tutor says her tones are good.

B: Yeah, they lied, too.


A: ...

B: We're polite that way.


A (in Mandarin): Hey, kiddo, hey neighbor, how are things going for you at YY these days? What grade are you in this year?

B (in Mandarin): I am good.

A: I heard you went on a trip to China recently with your whole class. What did you see there? What did you do?

B: We went to China.

A: Did you visit the Forbidden City and the Terracotta Army? Did you ride on trains, take boats, take hikes, eat out, stay with a host family?

B: We ate apples.

A: Wow, what a fantastic trip you must have had. How wonderful for you. Your Chinese is so good now.

B: Thank you.


The first one is very funny. The second one sounds like my oldest son in English when adults talk to him


Yea, but your kid can say what he wants in English, when he feels like it. YY students are actually taught a lot of Chinese words they can't use because they don't practice speaking much. My bilingual first grader does no better than I do in speaking to YY kids.


He can say what he wants in Chinese, too. He just hates talking to adults and sounds stilted and strange in any language. He is awkward, and so was his host brother who came from China to visit us. I'm happy that my son and his host brother are learning, even if they are both awkward and weird. I don't judge people's children who don't play competitive level sports like mine do, or play instruments, or aren't handsome, or whatever other measurements people have in their heads. Live and let live.


Not buying it, unless you've been hosting Chinese-speaking au pairs since before the boy learned to walk. I've volunteered at YY. I could hardly find a fully bilingual kid there of any age, among scores. I'm not judging anyone's children, it's the model that's flawed.


I'm so sorry for your troubles. Please note that YOUR troubles are not mine. Your troubles likely only represent you. Perhaps they are similar to a subset of other people's troubles, but proselytizing for converts just plain odd.

In other words, stop being so gobsmacked that people are happy that their kids know some Chinese. Geez. You don't OWN the language. We can play, too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whoah, weaknesses in Mandarin are not "easily correctible" at any age (says the musically talented ABC who speaks two dialects and reads OK, after attending heritage schools on Fri nights from K-12). I even spent a college year at a Chinese univ in a full immersion program without emerging as fluent in either dialect. In our experience, YY only gives good or excellent grades in speaking. Admins know that, with only a handful of true native-speaking kids in the school, speaking Mandarin is tied to SES: money for Chinese au pairs (native speakers without local grandparents often host them), tutors and immersion summer camps, preferably in China. Admins tell the Chinese teachers that it's unfair to grade kids down for speaking/listening ability, so they don't.


That sounds appropriate to me.


Some of us would prefer a more serious language program, working around limitations imposed by federal charter law, than what's "appropriate." YY could offer summer immersion camps with fees on a sliding scale. Many parents would happily pay. They could also start testing alleged heritage speakers for speaking ability on arrival and publishing the results. MoCo is doing all this.



I love it when people suggest what another enterprise should just "offer." Have you created a business plan? What's the curriculum? What's the staffing model? How many students will enroll (lower bound, estimated mean, upper bound)? What will be the costs and what's the price structure?

You realize that you're talking about creating a private program within a public school, right? This isn't an extension of what Yu Ying currently offers - that's a state-funded (or district-funded) model. This is entirely different. Nice that MoCo does it, have you considered moving there? Because DC does not. What's your proposal? What are the specifics?

If it's so easy, then you should have something in mind. Let's hear it.


Ummmm...a lot of DC charters have summer camps so I don't think this idea is all that crazy...



Really? That's splendid! Tell us please which DC charters run a "summer immersion camp"? The sort which might be described as "more serious language program, working around limitations imposed by federal charter law"? The sort for which "many parents would happily pay"?


Mundo Verde runs a full-day K-4th grade summer camp program for three weeks. Parents pay on a sliding scale. The school doesn't stop at handing out good grades for Spanish when kids can hardly speak or understand. Honestly, no language but Spanish is taught via "immersion" in this city. Learning a language 2 1/2 days a week only from teachers alone for around 8 months a year isn't immersion. Sounds good, but isn't. No wonder more and more parents pay to supplement. We've been hosting Chinese au pairs for years. YY parents often approach us to ask if our current au pair can tutor - more do this with each passing year. Our au pairs sometimes make more tutoring than we pay 'em as per State Dept. rules. The YY parents organization should fundraise to help pay tutors.


Stokes has summer camp too
Anonymous
Languages are for communicating. My sister learned Mandarin after college and now runs a business serving Chinese people (in Mandarin). I learned Spanish, Portuguese and another little known language after college. I speak Spanish fluently and use all for work regularly. Isn't it enough to give the kids a good base so they can pursue Mandarin more if they want to? It's not over at 5th grade people.
Anonymous
Why not just work hard to teach the kids to speak decent kid Mandarin when they're little, a time when they can learn relatively easily, without having to pay for classes or struggling to find time to study? Yes, there are Americans who learn languages well as adults; most don't.

The YY parents forking out 15-18K a year to host au pairs on J-1 visas, around 10% of the families, understand that there's no time like the present for the kids to learn to communicate well in Chinese. They've quietly built a network for sharing information on how make hosting au pairs work. One mom figured out that Go Au Pair, an agency in Utah, has a big pool of Mandarin speakers ready to roll, with a Mainland partner agency doing a good prepping candidates for visa interviews. Chinese au pair applicants get turned down for J-1 visas at a higher rate than most others, so the visa prep was key. Her discovery, and willingness to spread the word, has helped increase the number of YY families w/au pairs steadily over time. YY au pairs hang out a lot together, and families work to keep strong ones happy, partly so they'll extend for a 2nd year. Families have learned how to sponsor au pairs for student visas, so they can stay longer than 2 years. There are now YY/DCI families who've kept the same strong au pair for 3,4 even 5 years.

You can call it Tiger parenting to push hard on building the Chinese communication skills of ES-age kids, or you can call it fun and practical in the century of the rising China. It really is worth visiting a dual-immersion Mandarin program if you can swing it - what an eye opener.
Anonymous
7:02 is the perfect example of those wild-eyed panicky parents who got wasted on the KoolAid.

23:11's experience is a happy and much, much, much more dominant one -- without all the panicked, frothing angst.

post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: