Egypt Air Flight has disappeared from radar

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wasn't there something in the news this past week about super long security lines? I googled, no luck. This was in the US.

Maybe we knew about the threat and that's why we were being extra careful....

http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/18/pf/blame-for-airport-security-lines/

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-tsa-precheck-airport-security-lines-ohare-edit-0519-jm-20160518-story.html

[Anonymous]

http://www.sde.co.ke/article/2000202358/fireball-in-sky-over-greek-island-as-egyptian-plane-vanishes-with-66-passengers-on-board

'Fireball in sky over Greek island ' as Egyptian plane vanishes with 66 passengers on board

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Oh please. Get your head out of the sand

Seriously. The PC police, take your cause somewhere else or start a new thread. It's 2016, it's the world we live in. Wake up.

You supporters of verbal racism and sexism are missing either the humor link or logic. Pretty sure all caps up there was being sarcastic. For the likes of you.

[Anonymous]

Ugh. I've flown Egypt Air often. Experienced nothing but great friendly and reliable service with them. Really sad this happened to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Oh please. Get your head out of the sand

Seriously. The PC police, take your cause somewhere else or start a new thread. It's 2016, it's the world we live in. Wake up.

You supporters of verbal racism and sexism are missing either the humor link or logic. Pretty sure all caps up there was being sarcastic. For the likes of you.

Is verbal racism a double negative? What other forms of racism are there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

+1 Ridiculous. Potential Terrorism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

+1 Ridiculous. Potential Terrorism.

Jeff shut down another thread on this because someone used the word terrorism. To,erance knows no bounds

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

+1 Ridiculous. Potential Terrorism.

Jeff shut down another thread on this because someone used the word terrorism. To,erance knows no bounds

Liar. Your reading comprehension knows bounds. Very low bounds.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

+1 Ridiculous. Potential Terrorism.

Jeff shut down another thread on this because someone used the word terrorism. To,erance knows no bounds

Liar. Your reading comprehension knows bounds. Very low bounds.

r

Political forum. Under the guide of "we don't know enough" after someone mentioned the possibility of terrorism

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

+1 Ridiculous. Potential Terrorism.

Jeff shut down another thread on this because someone used the word terrorism. To,erance knows no bounds

Liar. Your reading comprehension knows bounds. Very low bounds.

r

Political forum. Under the guide of "we don't know enough" after someone mentioned the possibility of terrorism

Try again. As I said, your reading comprehension knows very low bounds.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

+1 Ridiculous. Potential Terrorism.

Jeff shut down another thread on this because someone used the word terrorism. To,erance knows no bounds

Liar. Your reading comprehension knows bounds. Very low bounds.

r

Political forum. Under the guide of "we don't know enough" after someone mentioned the possibility of terrorism

Try again. As I said, your reading comprehension knows very low bounds.

"Not only is is premature to call it a hijacking, there are any number of scenarios more likely than that one. So, I'm going to lock this thread" - Jeff Steele

Hijacking isn't terrorism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Oh please. Get your head out of the sand

Seriously. The PC police, take your cause somewhere else or start a new thread. It's 2016, it's the world we live in. Wake up.

You supporters of verbal racism and sexism are missing either the humor link or logic. Pretty sure all caps up there was being sarcastic. For the likes of you.

Is verbal racism a double negative? What other forms of racism are there?

There, there. Remember, you can keep using the n word (which would be the verbal racism to which I was referring, as distinct from practiced racism redlining, lynching, keeping people out of jobs due to their skin color) and calling women b's and h's (that would be verbal sexism), but people will be free to judge you. In fact, for those who so hate "PC culture" - which is basically being respectful of others - just strip away the veneer of humanity and go for it.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting most likely terrorism...

PLEASE STOP USING THAT TERM IMMEDIATELY. There is NO confirmation of that possibility at this time.

If you must, the correct term for speculating is "security issue."

Why? Do you seriously want people to not use the word terrorism because it might hurt a terrorists feelings?

+1 Ridiculous. Potential Terrorism.

Jeff shut down another thread on this because someone used the word terrorism. To,erance knows no bounds

Liar. Your reading comprehension knows bounds. Very low bounds.

r

Political forum. Under the guide of "we don't know enough" after someone mentioned the possibility of terrorism

Try again. As I said, your reading comprehension knows very low bounds.

"Not only is is premature to call it a hijacking, there are any number of scenarios more likely than that one. So, I'm going to lock this thread" - Jeff Steele

Hijacking isn't terrorism?

Hijacking is a form of terrorism. But, not the only form and not the likely form in this case. Is there any evidence whatsoever that this airplane was hijacked? The other thread was locked because there was an existing thread (this one) and because the subject line described the event as a "hijacking". Your claim that I locked the thread because the word "terrorism" was used was not factual. You are free to apologize for your error at any time.

[Anonymous]

Well. It's terrorism now. Hillary said so in her CNN interview this afternoon. Thus, it must be true.