|
I'm late to the party, but ... isn't it hard to teach a child not to hit when you're hitting them?
|
the point shows that using your logic of equating children to adults is ridiculous, regardless of the spanking issue. Yes, they need to be loved and protected, and sometimes, they need to be protected from themselves. If you saw an 8 yr old girl walking for miles alone with a bucket on her head, you'd call CPS on her parents for abuse, yet in many 3rd world countries, girls do this to get clean water. Perspective and situational. What you call abuse, others call trying to discipline their kids. We don't spank as our go-to punishment. Most of the time, taking away a privilege works. But, in certain cases, when a parent has tried for a year to enforce discipline to change a very bad behavior, a quick smack to the bottom was called for. There are many well adjusted adults today that were spanked a few times as children. These adult children still have great, loving relationships with their parents. |
This is Op. Yes, it is. But my worry is one day a bigger person will really hurt him in response. |
Absurd. This doesn't happen in the real world. You're concocting a world... Or rather, telling tourself a story to justify your actions. |
this assumes that the point of the lecture (spanking) is not to hit anyone, ever. while in fact the point is not to hit the parent. |
Really? Because the worl I live in people get shot for perceived slights or not respecting the authoeity of the neighborhood watch guy.-op |
+1 In the real world, when you hit someone, chances are, the person will hit you back. |
The point is to follow the rules and not to hit/spank anyone when not in a position of legitimate authority to do so. A parent, whether the other posters like it or not, IS in a position of legitimate authority over the child, and a parent spanking a child is a valid method of discipline. |
+1 I'm frankly astonished at the number of parents on here who are advocating for spanking. I really don't get it. Set aside the fact that it's HITTING, no matter how "softly" you do it, it's extremely lazy parenting. In OP's case, the stuff at school sounds like that particular classroom and teacher is a bad fit - at age 3 the teacher should be working with the kids on how to react appropriately, and redirecting them when problems arise. It doesn't sound like that's happening. OP should be using similar strategies (modeling behavior, telling child behavior isn't appropriate, redirecting) at home. Yes it can be time consuming and frustrating, but that's parenting. It takes time for small children to learn. |
Wow, so wrong on so many levels. |
Why do people always say it's "lazy parenting"? Is that a tacit admission of its effectiveness? And since when is the purpose of parenting to find the most difficult route possible? In and of itself, there's nothing wrong with "easy." In a different light, that just means "it works." |
Ah ha!! Rather than spanking, handcuff your children and put them in a big cage. That's what happens to adults who misbehave. |
No, that's again confusing results with actual effectiveness. Yes, it is probably effective to sit your kids in front of the TV all day long to solve the instant problem of them being annoying/ melting down/ whatever, but long term, not effective. Lazy parenting. In other words, I don't have time to try to play a long game here, so I'm just going to hit you and make the immediate problem go away. |
I'm that PP.... I'm not disputing that there's a logical basis for it, I just don't necessarily agree with the logical basis. I think it's going to be hard to teach a child not to hit if you hit them, even if you an articulate a logical basis for doing so. That is one of my main reasons for not spanking. |
| I think there is a wide range here. But I don't believe any parent when he or she says they spank in a controlled manner..absent of his or her own anger. I think that is utter bullshit. You spank because you are fed up and angry and out of control yourself...and seriously people just need to own this. |