"Party girl" reputation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Drinking and having hook-ups are not "bad behavior."

When they are confined in the office setting, they certainly are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You're just wrong about self-respect. There may be a correlation between lack of self-respect and people who get drunk and screw. But it's a tenuous correlation. I respect myself tremendously and am, nevertheless, a fan of getting drunk and having sex when they seem like fun things to do.

Sure, you respect yourself. That's why you get drunk. Whatever you say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

Lemme ask you something Mr-High-and-Mighty: who exactly does this "bad behavior" harm? Why is it bad behavior? Like, show me the harm to random passers by that this behavior causes that makes it 'bad". The woman and the men who make out with her aren't random passers-by - they're willing participants. You sound like the straight morons who complain that "gay marriage" is a threat to your straight relationship. I've got news: if you and your spouse are really straight - truly, not just closet cases in hardcore self-denial - then what gay people do has zero effect on you or your marriage.

The women who slut shame are angry that these "easy" women are more attractive to men and the men who slut shame just want women who they think they have no risk of losing. It's all about sexual property and ownership.

What the hell? You think that if you don't have drunken hook-ups you are against gay marriage? And that people who think drunken hook-ups are stupid don't think that that applies equally to both men and women? How does that follow?

Are you aware there is such a thing as "logic"? That's right - I'm not judging you for your morality. I'm judging you as intellectually bankrupt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

Lemme ask you something Mr-High-and-Mighty: who exactly does this "bad behavior" harm? Why is it bad behavior? Like, show me the harm to random passers by that this behavior causes that makes it 'bad". The woman and the men who make out with her aren't random passers-by - they're willing participants. You sound like the straight morons who complain that "gay marriage" is a threat to your straight relationship. I've got news: if you and your spouse are really straight - truly, not just closet cases in hardcore self-denial - then what gay people do has zero effect on you or your marriage.

The women who slut shame are angry that these "easy" women are more attractive to men and the men who slut shame just want women who they think they have no risk of losing. It's all about sexual property and ownership.

It is harming the OP, or didn't you read that? It is harming her career and attaining the serious relationship she says she wants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No man wants to smell the earlier deposit of another man in his mate

Do you sleep with women who don't bathe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not OP, but because I have mad skills in bed.

I get it, you also think you have a golden vagina.

You have no idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

Lemme ask you something Mr-High-and-Mighty: who exactly does this "bad behavior" harm? Why is it bad behavior? Like, show me the harm to random passers by that this behavior causes that makes it 'bad". The woman and the men who make out with her aren't random passers-by - they're willing participants. You sound like the straight morons who complain that "gay marriage" is a threat to your straight relationship. I've got news: if you and your spouse are really straight - truly, not just closet cases in hardcore self-denial - then what gay people do has zero effect on you or your marriage.

The women who slut shame are angry that these "easy" women are more attractive to men and the men who slut shame just want women who they think they have no risk of losing. It's all about sexual property and ownership.

It is harming the OP, or didn't you read that? It is harming her career and attaining the serious relationship she says she wants.

The harm is directly due to her lack of discretion and engaging in this behavior in a work environment. She needs to keep it away from the office. The behavior itself is not the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

+1

And this sort of attitude tends to form an underlying foundation of a lot of "feminist" writing on blogs these days - and I call it "feminist" because it's not actually feminist at all. And I say that as a woman who has proudly called herself a feminist her whole life. But I think bullshit like accusing everyone of slut-shaming and celebrating bad behavior because it's "empowering" or "liberating" or "fighting the patriarchy" is disingenuous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

Lemme ask you something Mr-High-and-Mighty: who exactly does this "bad behavior" harm? Why is it bad behavior? Like, show me the harm to random passers by that this behavior causes that makes it 'bad". The woman and the men who make out with her aren't random passers-by - they're willing participants. You sound like the straight morons who complain that "gay marriage" is a threat to your straight relationship. I've got news: if you and your spouse are really straight - truly, not just closet cases in hardcore self-denial - then what gay people do has zero effect on you or your marriage.

The women who slut shame are angry that these "easy" women are more attractive to men and the men who slut shame just want women who they think they have no risk of losing. It's all about sexual property and ownership.

It is harming the OP, or didn't you read that? It is harming her career and attaining the serious relationship she says she wants.

The harm is directly due to her lack of discretion and engaging in this behavior in a work environment. She needs to keep it away from the office. The behavior itself is not the problem.

All these people who say that they "outgrew" the drunk hook-up years - why did you stop, if the behavior itself is not the problem?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

+1

And this sort of attitude tends to form an underlying foundation of a lot of "feminist" writing on blogs these days - and I call it "feminist" because it's not actually feminist at all. And I say that as a woman who has proudly called herself a feminist her whole life. But I think bullshit like accusing everyone of slut-shaming and celebrating bad behavior because it's "empowering" or "liberating" or "fighting the patriarchy" is disingenuous.

This is exactly right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

Lemme ask you something Mr-High-and-Mighty: who exactly does this "bad behavior" harm? Why is it bad behavior? Like, show me the harm to random passers by that this behavior causes that makes it 'bad". The woman and the men who make out with her aren't random passers-by - they're willing participants. You sound like the straight morons who complain that "gay marriage" is a threat to your straight relationship. I've got news: if you and your spouse are really straight - truly, not just closet cases in hardcore self-denial - then what gay people do has zero effect on you or your marriage.

The women who slut shame are angry that these "easy" women are more attractive to men and the men who slut shame just want women who they think they have no risk of losing. It's all about sexual property and ownership.

It is harming the OP, or didn't you read that? It is harming her career and attaining the serious relationship she says she wants.

The harm is directly due to her lack of discretion and engaging in this behavior in a work environment. She needs to keep it away from the office. The behavior itself is not the problem.

All these people who say that they "outgrew" the drunk hook-up years - why did you stop, if the behavior itself is not the problem?

I got married, so I only hook up with my husband now, and we have children and so don't get "raging" drunk very often.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

+1

And this sort of attitude tends to form an underlying foundation of a lot of "feminist" writing on blogs these days - and I call it "feminist" because it's not actually feminist at all. And I say that as a woman who has proudly called herself a feminist her whole life. But I think bullshit like accusing everyone of slut-shaming and celebrating bad behavior because it's "empowering" or "liberating" or "fighting the patriarchy" is disingenuous.

Nonsense. People are being called out for hateful, destructive name-calling. Sleeping around doesn't harm anyone; it's nobody's business if you do. Name calling harms people and is directed at harming people.

You're being "attacked" for being a jerk. Jerks are very harmful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's peculiar that "having respect for yourself" is often code for "acting in conformity with someone else's more conservative moral code."

I think it's peculiar that people think they should be able to escape the consequences for their bad behavior by attacking those who call them out on it.

Lemme ask you something Mr-High-and-Mighty: who exactly does this "bad behavior" harm? Why is it bad behavior? Like, show me the harm to random passers by that this behavior causes that makes it 'bad". The woman and the men who make out with her aren't random passers-by - they're willing participants. You sound like the straight morons who complain that "gay marriage" is a threat to your straight relationship. I've got news: if you and your spouse are really straight - truly, not just closet cases in hardcore self-denial - then what gay people do has zero effect on you or your marriage.

The women who slut shame are angry that these "easy" women are more attractive to men and the men who slut shame just want women who they think they have no risk of losing. It's all about sexual property and ownership.

It is harming the OP, or didn't you read that? It is harming her career and attaining the serious relationship she says she wants.

The harm is directly due to her lack of discretion and engaging in this behavior in a work environment. She needs to keep it away from the office. The behavior itself is not the problem.

All these people who say that they "outgrew" the drunk hook-up years - why did you stop, if the behavior itself is not the problem?

You do get bored with it, eventually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not OP, but because I have mad skills in bed.

I get it, you also think you have a golden vagina.

You have no idea.

Golden from crusted up disease sores

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not OP, but because I have mad skills in bed.

I get it, you also think you have a golden vagina.

You have no idea.

Golden from crusted up disease sores

Wow! You got a big case of bitter resentment there.

Never had an STD, actually. Sorry to burst your bubble.