In Case You're Wondering What Crazy Benghazi Lady Is On About...But Were Afraid To Ask

[Anonymous]

Can anyone tell me where the President was after 5:30 PM the night of the attacks? Anyone?

[Anonymous]

takoma wrote:Somewhere in the middle of Kroft's question,Obama mumbled something like "right", meaning to me, "I get where you're going." Then he actually answered the question "Well it's too early to know exactly how this came about ..."

In other words, one of our resident ranters totally mis-characterized the exchange. But he or she got me to waste time responding (along with several other suckers), so chalk it up as the ranter's victory.

Since their spouse won't talk to them anymore, and they dont have any friends anymore, you can feel good about the social charity, at least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any time a conservative posts a quote that cuts off suddenly, you can be sure that the truth is in the two minutes that follow it.

I wonder whether the poster did that deliberately or is being duped by their media.

The poster (me) is well aware that the President cannot call claim to have called this a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden on the 12th, then go a show a mere few hours later and claim he doesn't know. In fact, we now know that they knew that evening. Furthermore, the President went on more shows days later, claiming similar.

If you think the most powerful man in the world doesn't know the details, I want some of what y'all have. There's no way the President checked out at 5:30 PM during an event like this. If he indeed did, y'all should be questioning his leadership capabilities.

The most powerful man in the world didn't know that there were no WMD in Iraq. Despite a network of spies and satellites. He trusted the word of a few people who had an axe to grind with Saddam Hussein.

So yes, even The Most Powerful Man on Earth is subject to errors in information. Unless you want to admit that GWB lied to America. Your call, write back and tell us which it is.

Actually, they are in Syria. Those satellites proved that, it's documented, but have at it.

BUT, let's say you are correct. How many times did we hear - and are still hearing - BUSH LIED BUSH LIED from liberals? And now we're hearing "Obama the great but he's fallible" LOL.

The difference here is that it was known in the first 24 hours what was going on and Obama chose to go on National TV and lie anyway. And Bush was not missing during the 9/11/2001 attacks, as Obama was during the 9/11/2012 attacks. Missing. Gone. After 5:30 PM. Where was he?

So you concede that Bush lied, and liberals said it a lot. But then what happened? How was Bush held accountable? How was anyone in his administration held accountable? Hundreds of thousands of human beings are dead or displaced because of his actions, and life in Iraq is a nightmare, and thousands of our soldiers are dead or maimed, and billions of dollars are gone, and was anyone held accountable? Do you think it's ok if we just sit around and complain about Obama and absolutely nothing happens no matter what wrong he may commit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any time a conservative posts a quote that cuts off suddenly, you can be sure that the truth is in the two minutes that follow it.

I wonder whether the poster did that deliberately or is being duped by their media.

The poster (me) is well aware that the President cannot call claim to have called this a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden on the 12th, then go a show a mere few hours later and claim he doesn't know. In fact, we now know that they knew that evening. Furthermore, the President went on more shows days later, claiming similar.

If you think the most powerful man in the world doesn't know the details, I want some of what y'all have. There's no way the President checked out at 5:30 PM during an event like this. If he indeed did, y'all should be questioning his leadership capabilities.

The most powerful man in the world didn't know that there were no WMD in Iraq. Despite a network of spies and satellites. He trusted the word of a few people who had an axe to grind with Saddam Hussein.

So yes, even The Most Powerful Man on Earth is subject to errors in information. Unless you want to admit that GWB lied to America. Your call, write back and tell us which it is.

Actually, they are in Syria. Those satellites proved that, it's documented, but have at it.

BUT, let's say you are correct. How many times did we hear - and are still hearing - BUSH LIED BUSH LIED from liberals? And now we're hearing "Obama the great but he's fallible" LOL.

The difference here is that it was known in the first 24 hours what was going on and Obama chose to go on National TV and lie anyway. And Bush was not missing during the 9/11/2001 attacks, as Obama was during the 9/11/2012 attacks. Missing. Gone. After 5:30 PM. Where was he?

So you concede that Bush lied, and liberals said it a lot. But then what happened? How was Bush held accountable? How was anyone in his administration held accountable? Hundreds of thousands of human beings are dead or displaced because of his actions, and life in Iraq is a nightmare, and thousands of our soldiers are dead or maimed, and billions of dollars are gone, and was anyone held accountable? Do you think it's ok if we just sit around and complain about Obama and absolutely nothing happens no matter what wrong he may commit?

I conceded that? I thought I said that the WMDs were moved to Syria, as tracked by satellite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any time a conservative posts a quote that cuts off suddenly, you can be sure that the truth is in the two minutes that follow it.

I wonder whether the poster did that deliberately or is being duped by their media.

The poster (me) is well aware that the President cannot call claim to have called this a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden on the 12th, then go a show a mere few hours later and claim he doesn't know. In fact, we now know that they knew that evening. Furthermore, the President went on more shows days later, claiming similar.

If you think the most powerful man in the world doesn't know the details, I want some of what y'all have. There's no way the President checked out at 5:30 PM during an event like this. If he indeed did, y'all should be questioning his leadership capabilities.

The most powerful man in the world didn't know that there were no WMD in Iraq. Despite a network of spies and satellites. He trusted the word of a few people who had an axe to grind with Saddam Hussein.

So yes, even The Most Powerful Man on Earth is subject to errors in information. Unless you want to admit that GWB lied to America. Your call, write back and tell us which it is.

Actually, they are in Syria. Those satellites proved that, it's documented, but have at it.

BUT, let's say you are correct. How many times did we hear - and are still hearing - BUSH LIED BUSH LIED from liberals? And now we're hearing "Obama the great but he's fallible" LOL.

The difference here is that it was known in the first 24 hours what was going on and Obama chose to go on National TV and lie anyway. And Bush was not missing during the 9/11/2001 attacks, as Obama was during the 9/11/2012 attacks. Missing. Gone. After 5:30 PM. Where was he?

So you concede that Bush lied, and liberals said it a lot. But then what happened? How was Bush held accountable? How was anyone in his administration held accountable? Hundreds of thousands of human beings are dead or displaced because of his actions, and life in Iraq is a nightmare, and thousands of our soldiers are dead or maimed, and billions of dollars are gone, and was anyone held accountable? Do you think it's ok if we just sit around and complain about Obama and absolutely nothing happens no matter what wrong he may commit?

I conceded that? I thought I said that the WMDs were moved to Syria, as tracked by satellite?

Yeah, but that's stupid, so I'm just going with your BUT let's say you are correct. But if you don't want to hold Bush responsible for the catastrophic mistake that ruined a whole country, that's fine. I don't think you're worth the aggravation.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
I conceded that? I thought I said that the WMDs were moved to Syria, as tracked by satellite?

No evidence of this. Again, as with your accusations about Soros, you show no interest in the truth. The so-called "satellite evidence" you previously showed me was a picture of a site at which Syria stores it's own chemical weapons. There was nothing to suggest Iraq's weapons were there. Given that we have captured everyone that would have been responsible for the move, we would know about it had it happened.

[Anonymous]

Israelis have the evidence as demonstrated in previous threads but I know how much you think of Israel. No one captured/defected spoke of this? Carry on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Israelis have the evidence as demonstrated in previous threads but I know how much you think of Israel. No one captured/defected spoke of this? Carry on.

Yeah, this is incredibly stupid and a flat out lie. Please spare us or go away.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Israelis have the evidence as demonstrated in previous threads but I know how much you think of Israel. No one captured/defected spoke of this? Carry on.

Where is the evidence? Can you give me a link showing that someone who was captured or defected talked about the transfer of WMDs?

[Anonymous]

This is an interesting debate over whether Benghazi was a "terrorist attack" or an "act of terror", but the fact is it was neither. Terrorism is an attack on civilian population, not military/government targets. It's the same reason that the WTC attacks were terrorism, but the Pentagon attack was not.

The problem is that the previous administration fell into the same trap that a lot of ham-fisted, authoritarian regimes do, which is to define "terrorism" as anything we don't like.

http://prospect.org/article/benghazi-was-neither-terrorist-attack-nor-act-terror

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israelis have the evidence as demonstrated in previous threads but I know how much you think of Israel. No one captured/defected spoke of this? Carry on.

Yeah, this is incredibly stupid and a flat out lie. Please spare us or go away.

Why would you discount Israeli intelligence?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israelis have the evidence as demonstrated in previous threads but I know how much you think of Israel. No one captured/defected spoke of this? Carry on.

Where is the evidence? Can you give me a link showing that someone who was captured or defected talked about the transfer of WMDs?

We talked about this already.

[Anonymous]

A good article from 2005:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/apr/27/20050427-121915-1667r/?page=all

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israelis have the evidence as demonstrated in previous threads but I know how much you think of Israel. No one captured/defected spoke of this? Carry on.

Yeah, this is incredibly stupid and a flat out lie. Please spare us or go away.

Why would you discount Israeli intelligence?

I don't. but if Israel had that intelligence it would be broadcast on national television. They have not hidden their information about any other WMD threat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A good article from 2005:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/apr/27/20050427-121915-1667r/?page=all

So basically, someobody says they heard something, but no one has any evidence.

Sounds like the yellowcake scandal all over again.