How do you know she was supposed to use it for college? Where did you hear that? See it written in a legal document? If that was his desire, he could have made it happen through better estate planning. |
You put $1,000,000 in a home renovation? |
| I'm the benficiary and executor of a $10+ million estate. A very frugal relative with no children. |
Read it again. They put their half of a $200K annuity towards a home renovation. |
Isn't this what minor aristocrats are supposed to do? |
| I thought my husband was going to inherit $5 million or $6 million. It ended up being closer to $30 million. |
We follow (loosely) the idea of "die with nothing". We always knew we would be HNW (hit $8M before age 38) and most likely UHNW someday. We lived comfortably until we hit the $10M+, then we splurged a bit (paid cash for a $1.2M home, but could have easily purchased in the $2.5M+ and in our area that would not be too extravagant (average home price in our area is over $800K+)). but our kids had no clue what we were truly worth. They knew college would be paid for, and they didn't have to worry about the first car, etc. and that we took nicer vacations. But it wasn't until we hit UHNW ($30M+) that they became aware of how much. Now they know, and we gift them yearly to the max, and they invest 95% of it, maxing their ROTHs and 401K and saving for a home. They know we will fund any future grandkids education and other needs (medical, therapies, etc) and will always pay for them to fly and visit us (even once there are SO and grandkids), and they will be included if they want on at least 1-2 vacations per year. Them having college fully paid for, maxing their retirement from a young age (we matched their IRAs as soon as they started earning W2 income) is much more beneficial than waiting until they are 50+ and we are dead. They know they can choose a "lower paying career path" and still be comfortable, they can afford that house closer to work (so they and their partner have shorter commutes and more time with the family) and with better schools or they can use private schools if they prefer that route. That is a huge advantage for setting their path in life. Once we pay for college, set them up afterwards, give them 10 years of fully funded retirement, a downpayment for a house and fund grandkids education, they really won't "need" anything else. But they will get more along the way and when we die. But I'd rather give it when we are alive and it matters most to them. But you cannot do that until you are fiscally sound yourself. Until you are 100%+ set for retirement and long term medical care for you and your spouse, you shouldn't be giving away funds to kids/grandkids, IMO. |
Very true. But at a certain point/income level, don't you want to help your kids/grandkids while you are alive? And while it matters most to them? Struggling to age 55 and living in a "not the best school district" and then inheriting $2-3M is not the best quality of life. If you are 99% certain they will get that, why not start giving some of it at an earlier point? |
That’s exactly what my husband’s parents did. The best planning they did was generation skipping trusts. When the kids are adults they have their own individual accounts to use as needed. |
Because it was family money. She didn't make it, and it didn't come from her side of the family either. It had been in my grandmother's family for generations, so yes I was entitled to it. For some reason she thought strangers were more entitled to sitting in an auditorium with her name on it than actual members of the family had to buy a ticket. The people who came to this country and built that wealth wanted it to go to their progeny. It was not hers to give away. Just like the white house is not Trump's to tear down -- he is just the caretaker at the moment, and the Kennedy Center is not his to put his name on. There is literally nothing wrong with being entitled BTW. |
That sounds totally unethical. I no longer think "Wow, yeah, he was right to give it to his caregivers." Those people can be scum and yes, they are being paid to do a job and could very easily con old people out of their money like this. I doubt this is legal. It's certainly not ethical. |
Yeah, this is the kind of thinking that "entitled" people have, while those who don't get it doom their kids to live with poverty mentality and maybe even be low income the majority of their lives. If you give a younger adult some money to start a business or buy a house in a good neighborhood or go to a good college to get a degree in something they like and can make a good living at, it makes a huge difference to the quality of the rest of their lives. Why give someone 60 years old a windfall when the major part of their lives is over already? How sad is that. |
|
"
Yes, due to divorce/remarriage. Lesson: if you divorce make your ex maintain life insurance for your kids. Or a new spouse will make sure to take all." EXCEPT -- That policy should only stay in place up to the point when the child support payments end. If you want to ensure that the kids will receive an inheritance in the event that you remarry, that's a different thing. A life insurance policy can work for that scenario too, but make sure to spell out that it's NOT for the purpose of backfilling child support in the event of an early death before your kids turn 18. |
|
My dad, his siblings, and his cousins were recently contacted by a lawyer about an inheritance. Apparently, there was a large parcel of land being sold but when they determined that the estate selling the land wasn't actually entitled to the money, they searched for who was entitled to the inheritance. It turned out that a couple of generations back the man who owned the land killed his wife, who I guess was the technical owner of the land. He was therefore not legally allowed to inherit the land, nor were his children (from a later relationship). The land reverted through the estate, etc, etc. In comes my Dad and his generation.
When all was said and done, I think 10 people ended up inheriting about 20k each. This was entirely unexpected. My parents are pretty well off, and they felt kind of weird about the whole situation, so they donated the money to a battered women's shelter. It was a really interesting situation. |
| My spouse’s grandmother died when we were in our early 20s. Unexpectedly spouse and sibling were the named beneficiaries on long held whole life insurance policies totaling just over $100,000 each. We had recently purchased our first house and used it to pay off our HELOC and establish a more robust emergency fund, which all in turn allowed us to free up money that had been allocated to those items to increase our 401k contributions. |