2 different posters? lol, nice try. clearly it's one person obsessed with the evils of cell phones. |
Again, the problem isn’t just a kids own phone but the disruption your entitled teen causes with theirs for the whole class. You understand the school makes lots of rules your teen must adhere to as a public school student. They can’t bring in their guitar and walk around campus with that either. |
I’m the castles in the sky tech employed PP, I write thoughtful responses that address what your claim. Another PP laughed at you and said you had no point. Which is true, simply claiming I don’t have a high school student when I actually do does not provide any rationale as to why it’s “different ” for high schoolers now that they need near constant phone access all school day. |
Your kid is going to need to learn to deal with a lot of things in the real world, sorry to inform you. |
Of course they’ll be fine. You pro-pouchers are so obnoxious because you act like as long as the kid won’t die, “it’s fiiiiine!” But you don’t acknowledge ANY possible downsides to pouching (vs, for example, kids putting their phones in a shoe organizer during each class). Did your kid’s high school use pouches last year? Mine did. And yes, everyone figured things out, but there were a lot of unnecessary annoyances, like kids needing to take videos with Mac books for class assignments, not being able to tune instruments as easily or photograph artwork assignments to upload. These are all “small” problems, but they were created through an unnecessary policy, when phone use in class can be stopped in other ways. |
I actually don't know any parents who are staunchly pro-pouch. That's a weird description. I know a lot of parents who are in favor of Away for the Day and feel strongly that cell phones are disruptive in school. I don't know any parents who feel very strongly about how APS implements that. My understanding is that APS administration and teachers picked pouches as the best logistical solution, piloted and then adopted it, all considering how APS high schools function. I'm totally supportive of them choosing a solution. I actually prefer the (free) middle school solution of cell phones in lockers, but that doesn't work for high schools. So yeah, I don't get the histrionics around kids not having their cell phones during the school day. I think it's a good thing. |
In “the real world” most disruptive students will just sleep off their hangover and skip class and boss/professors have the right to kick out students who are disruptive. High school and compulsory education of minors is far from the real world. |
1) videos and photos of class assignments are art busy work. If they are in an actual multimedia class the school should provide cameras 2) instrument tuners are like $15 at art and music, so students can buy one or share the class one or time against each other like real musicians. |
Why can’t APS just pad the morning and afternoon free periods to give them time to drop cell phones off at their lockers and pick up at end of day? |
My understanding is that there aren't enough lockers for all kids to be assigned one. |
A lot of music sleepaway camps don’t allow phones. Kids there do just fine with separate tuners and metronomes. This is not a problem |
Why didn’t they build lockers when they did the addition at WL? I honestly think lockers would be cheaper than these pouches. |
Disruptions makes a teachers job more difficult. Why is this so hard for you to understand? |
This has been answered but someone deleted those posts. They might as well delete the whole thread as OP clearly has never met a teenager or stepped foot on an APS high school. This thread is a waste of everyone's time. |
I’m the PP advocating for lockers but not the OP. My DD started high school today and I approve of no phones all day, but worry the hassle of the pouches and the ever growing cost will mean they will drop the policy and return to the free for all. |