The business model is to secure taxpayer dollars in exchange for showing they can churn out students with high test scores (number of students who don’t make it through is not important as long as some get good test scores). There’s no profitability in adding extras and you can convince parents it’s because you’re so serious about academics, not because you’re trying to keep costs down for shareholders. |
|
I’ll summarize Basis and we can end it here.
If you have a high performing kid who wants to grind out middle and high school, Basis will work for you. If you have a high performing kid who is more well rounded and wants or needs more then that, go elsewhere. It’s not worth the grind with no balance and not much joy. |
Do we have to close Banneker too if some kids decide it's too hard? Do you have the same policy for Duke Ellington, if some kids enroll but decide later they want to be engineers and not actors? What about our many bilingual schools? They lose an *enormous* number of kids. By your weird standard, I guess they'd have to go too. |
You know some families and kids love BASIS, right? |
Not closed, but restructured or reorganized or whatever. And yeah, if Duke Ellington stops serving most of the kids that get sent there, it should be retooled or shut. We shouldn't be using tax dollars to support education that doesn't work for most people. |
That's nice. But why should the rest of us pay for it? Want fringe curriculum, send your kids to private. |
This is how you end up with nonsense like "differentiation is the same as segregation." race to the bottom, diluted curriculum that ends up benefitting no one. |
ok crazy pants, but there are literally dozens of elementary schools in this city where fewer than 10 percent of the students meet or exceed CAPE standards in math. how about we focus on fixing the garbage schools instead of tearing down the ones the excellent ones. |
Ha! Having high academic standards is "fringe"? Sweetie, you are the problem here. |
segregation is using taxpayer dollars to fund a for-profit that caters to a small group of kids who, demographically, aren't representative of the city and saying "well don't blame me, Banneker is a lousy school, give me your money to fund my kid and eff those kids in public". Suggest to a BASIS parent that the money we send to the investors would be better used improving DCPS and you'll hear all sorts of bizarre arguments. Bad schools or schools that only serve a fraction of the population should not be funded by taxpayer dollars. |
How many students start at BASIS and how many graduate? That's the percentage I'm concerned about. If we looked at that troubled elementary schools and said "actually it's a success if you look at those 10 percent who meet or exceed CAPE... if you send the other 90 percent somewhere else" they'd look a lot better. |
Well that's a red herring. As I've said, I want the highest academic standards for all kids, not a few kids. Setting up a system that only benefits a fraction of potential students and casting off the rest as "not BASIS material" isn't a viable solution for me. That's not how public schools work--that's how private schools work. |
No. That's also how DCPS application high schools work, and how many other charter schools work. Your "values" are actually internally consistent -- you want a public schools system that only funds neighborhood public schools that everyone can attend, plus private schools that people with means can opt to attend. There are actually many cities and towns around the country where that is what exists. But, that's not DC (or NYC, or SF, and Philly and New Orleans, etc). Maybe you need to move. |
If 70 percent of the kids who enroll at Walls or Duke Ellington wash out before graduation we would not find it acceptable. |
|
You also probably need to do some research to learn why DC decided to open its doors to charter schools in the first place -- it's because DCPS was failing the community in the 1990s.
|