BC vs WashU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wash U is several tiers higher and will open more doors between alumni, professors, and classmates. Dropping WUSTL at an elegant dinner party will elicit approval and nods, whereas other guests will ask "What is a BC? Is that a disease?"

Aww, there you are. The prolific BC basher is a little slow on responding but expect lots of umbrage about TIERS and "jokes" at how deranged anyone would be to choose BC and that anyone who goes there must not want a career or "what is Chestnut Hill"? He's nothing if not incessant and predictable.

And here it is. The BC basher comes to respond to every post. And now with the TIERS and PEERS!!!
It's not about fit - it's his fervent view that BC students are deranged and destined to add ketchup to your fries. His posts have been deleted on other thread where he acts as bully and monopolizer and derails the entire thread. Fortunately some others were able to get some viewpoints across before the BC basher took over.

Name one post that criticized BC or was neutral towards it that was removed.

Not searching "on other threads"
Don't deny that you've been responsive for wrecking many threads and that your posts have been removed.

I cannot recall one of my posts, or any other posters' posts reasonably assessing BC's value and desirability, being removed. All have used PG language and refrained from insulting other posters.

Again, no one apologized for saying WashU students are unattractive, it is really gross behavior for middle aged people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given the gap between WashU and BC , would it be fair for UMass boosters to say they are a peer of BC?

A very apt comparison. I wish UMass boosters all the best, it is only fair. although they pay less than 1/3 the cost for a similar level of prestige.

he said to himself

Report it and see for yourself. You are incorrect.

I am not making unfounded claims. There are multiple posters criticizing BC and saying it is not on WashU's level or as desirable.

[Anonymous]

He's the master of the tiers. Do not mess with his tiers. No one makes tiers the way he does. His are the best. Perfect tiers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given the gap between WashU and BC , would it be fair for UMass boosters to say they are a peer of BC?

A very apt comparison. I wish UMass boosters all the best, it is only fair. although they pay less than 1/3 the cost for a similar level of prestige.

he said to himself

Report it and see for yourself. You are incorrect.

I am not making unfounded claims. There are multiple posters criticizing BC and saying it is not on WashU's level or as desirable.

I said to myself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's the master of the tiers. Do not mess with his tiers. No one makes tiers the way he does. His are the best. Perfect tiers.

TIERS & PEERS!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's the master of the tiers. Do not mess with his tiers. No one makes tiers the way he does. His are the best. Perfect tiers.

Please make a credible argument about how BC is in the same tier as WashU, and please describe what other colleges would be in that tier. Please do not make the tier include over 10 schools. Good luck!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wash U is several tiers higher and will open more doors between alumni, professors, and classmates. Dropping WUSTL at an elegant dinner party will elicit approval and nods, whereas other guests will ask "What is a BC? Is that a disease?"

Aww, there you are. The prolific BC basher is a little slow on responding but expect lots of umbrage about TIERS and "jokes" at how deranged anyone would be to choose BC and that anyone who goes there must not want a career or "what is Chestnut Hill"? He's nothing if not incessant and predictable.

And here it is. The BC basher comes to respond to every post. And now with the TIERS and PEERS!!!
It's not about fit - it's his fervent view that BC students are deranged and destined to add ketchup to your fries. His posts have been deleted on other thread where he acts as bully and monopolizer and derails the entire thread. Fortunately some others were able to get some viewpoints across before the BC basher took over.

Name one post that criticized BC or was neutral towards it that was removed.

Not searching "on other threads"
Don't deny that you've been responsive for wrecking many threads and that your posts have been removed.

I cannot recall one of my posts, or any other posters' posts reasonably assessing BC's value and desirability, being removed. All have used PG language and refrained from insulting other posters.

Again, no one apologized for saying WashU students are unattractive, it is really gross behavior for middle aged people.

You yourself pretended to be a current high school senior on one thread saying you had a BC acceptance in hand. You also promised to go away. Still waiting ....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given the gap between WashU and BC , would it be fair for UMass boosters to say they are a peer of BC?

A very apt comparison. I wish UMass boosters all the best, it is only fair. although they pay less than 1/3 the cost for a similar level of prestige.

he said to himself

Report it and see for yourself. You are incorrect.

I am not making unfounded claims. There are multiple posters criticizing BC and saying it is not on WashU's level or as desirable.

I said to myself

Multiple posters dislike BC comparing itself to Duke, Dartmouth, USC, Cornell, WashU, Vanderbilt, Brown, and MIT. Don't do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's the master of the tiers. Do not mess with his tiers. No one makes tiers the way he does. His are the best. Perfect tiers.

Please make a credible argument about how BC is in the same tier as WashU, and please describe what other colleges would be in that tier. Please do not make the tier include over 10 schools. Good luck!

Tiers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WashU is a better school, my guess is your kid will have similar outcomes opportunity-wise from either. Which school did they like better?

OP here. Thanks! They seem to like BC but I am a bit concerned that they may be missing on a better opportunity in terms of quality of education and prospects for job placement.

Kid's preference of one over the other outweighs any other slight differences. Chances are better that kids thrive where they choose to be.
Great choices -- congrats!

[Anonymous]

BC is a peer of Harvard while WashU is a peer of Emory. Choose whichever you want based on vibes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wash U is several tiers higher and will open more doors between alumni, professors, and classmates. Dropping WUSTL at an elegant dinner party will elicit approval and nods, whereas other guests will ask "What is a BC? Is that a disease?"

Aww, there you are. The prolific BC basher is a little slow on responding but expect lots of umbrage about TIERS and "jokes" at how deranged anyone would be to choose BC and that anyone who goes there must not want a career or "what is Chestnut Hill"? He's nothing if not incessant and predictable.

And here it is. The BC basher comes to respond to every post. And now with the TIERS and PEERS!!!
It's not about fit - it's his fervent view that BC students are deranged and destined to add ketchup to your fries. His posts have been deleted on other thread where he acts as bully and monopolizer and derails the entire thread. Fortunately some others were able to get some viewpoints across before the BC basher took over.

Name one post that criticized BC or was neutral towards it that was removed.

Not searching "on other threads"
Don't deny that you've been responsive for wrecking many threads and that your posts have been removed.

I cannot recall one of my posts, or any other posters' posts reasonably assessing BC's value and desirability, being removed. All have used PG language and refrained from insulting other posters.

Again, no one apologized for saying WashU students are unattractive, it is really gross behavior for middle aged people.

You yourself pretended to be a current high school senior on one thread saying you had a BC acceptance in hand. You also promised to go away. Still waiting ....

I do not know who you are referring to. I am not a HS student and I did not apply to BC when I was going through the process. My safety was ranked higher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BC is a peer of Harvard while WashU is a peer of Emory. Choose whichever you want based on vibes.

This is the tl;dr of pro-BC posters on DCUM. BC is overtaking Oxford and Cambridge for most historic campus pretty soon. The sky is the limit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WashU is a better school, my guess is your kid will have similar outcomes opportunity-wise from either. Which school did they like better?

OP here. Thanks! They seem to like BC but I am a bit concerned that they may be missing on a better opportunity in terms of quality of education and prospects for job placement.

Kid's preference of one over the other outweighs any other slight differences. Chances are better that kids thrive where they choose to be.
Great choices -- congrats!

Translation below:

Kid's preference of Harvard (WashU) or Middlesex County Community College (BC) outweighs any other slight differences. Chances are better that kids thrive where they choose to be.
Great choices -- congrats!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BC is a peer of Harvard while WashU is a peer of Emory. Choose whichever you want based on vibes.

This is the tl;dr of pro-BC posters on DCUM. BC is overtaking Oxford and Cambridge for most historic campus pretty soon. The sky is the limit.

This is the BC Basher prolific posting where here can't get engagement so he creates his own controversy. Then denies it (like the time he said he had a BC acceptance in hand)