Vindman in VA-7: how badly will he lose?

[Anonymous]

You are Putin-obsessed and also full of shit. No disinformation here at all. Vindman is a loser. You clearly have some connection to him. Just admit it English professor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I swear on my kids’ lives that I am not a Russian bot. I’m a rather boring exurb Virginian. I worked alongside Yev, and I just know he is a liar. Most politicians are liars, and this just proves he was-and is-far more politician than Soldier.

They don't have English-language elementary schools or high school lessons on logical syllogisms in exurban Virginia? I'm a city girl myself but I have been there and the people definitely don't talk like you.

I don't usually consider American lawyers to be particularly eloquent writers, but they are all, as a rule, able to communicate effectively in English. Plus even the most disingenuous lawyer would not make the kind of... non-logical assertions you have made in this thread. Would an American attorney, someone who worked alongside an American JAG officer, ever, EVER write that someone "got not good paper"?

No, of course. I don't think you're a bot but you certainly are a troll. If you were a mere Trump follower from bum-fudge Virginia, your English would be far better. At least, while the mistakes you make might reflect an insufficiency of education (or, if you were a Trumpy lawyer from bum-fudge Virginia, you might affect a certain studied folksiness), they wouldn't suggest poor translations of foreign expressions. Every thing you have said supports Russia's agenda. I can't be sure you're Russian but you are definitely not American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are Putin-obsessed and also full of shit. No disinformation here at all. Vindman is a loser. You clearly have some connection to him. Just admit it English professor.

Two things are true:

No information, either. Just a bunch of subjective assertions from someone with an inappropriate agenda. At first I thought it was some logically-challenged idiot with a weird grudge, but now it is pretty clear that you serve Russian interests.

[Anonymous]

Get some professional help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I swear on my kids’ lives that I am not a Russian bot. I’m a rather boring exurb Virginian. I worked alongside Yev, and I just know he is a liar. Most politicians are liars, and this just proves he was-and is-far more politician than Soldier.

They don't have English-language elementary schools or high school lessons on logical syllogisms in exurban Virginia? I'm a city girl myself but I have been there and the people definitely don't talk like you.

I don't usually consider American lawyers to be particularly eloquent writers, but they are all, as a rule, able to communicate effectively in English. Plus even the most disingenuous lawyer would not make the kind of... non-logical assertions you have made in this thread. Would an American attorney, someone who worked alongside an American JAG officer, ever, EVER write that someone "got not good paper"?

No, of course. I don't think you're a bot but you certainly are a troll. If you were a mere Trump follower from bum-fudge Virginia, your English would be far better. At least, while the mistakes you make might reflect an insufficiency of education (or, if you were a Trumpy lawyer from bum-fudge Virginia, you might affect a certain studied folksiness), they wouldn't suggest poor translations of foreign expressions. Every thing you have said supports Russia's agenda. I can't be sure you're Russian but you are definitely not American.

Negative information in a performance file in the Army is known as “bad paper.” I should have used “mediocre paper,” but “mediocre” is better than what he received. He did not receive “bad paper” because he did not engage in misconduct. His evaluations accurately reflected his lackluster performance as an attorney, teammate, and Soldier - in other words “not good paper.”

Are you the lawyer who threatened The Independent alleging their story is slanderous?

[Anonymous]

So he won the primary. Makes me wonder about this whole thread...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So he won the primary. Makes me wonder about this whole thread...

Well I don't think anyone here was insinuating he was not going to win the primary. I can't even guess how much he outearned and outspent his primary opponents. He was clearly the frontrunner for the nomination.

[Anonymous]

I knew he would win because he was the anointed one. I stand by this being bad for the democratic party.

[Anonymous]

I'm a Democrat but Vindman is a loser. People want to hear about bread and butter issues, not his personal grudge against some faraway dictator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Democrat but Vindman is a loser. People want to hear about bread and butter issues, not his personal grudge against some faraway dictator.

He will be fine on bread and butter issues, and he has foreign policy and executive experience that can be helpful in the Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are Putin-obsessed and also full of shit. No disinformation here at all. Vindman is a loser. You clearly have some connection to him. Just admit it English professor.

No

GOP party of Putin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Democrat but Vindman is a loser. People want to hear about bread and butter issues, not his personal grudge against some faraway dictator.

Apparently he isn’t a loser since he won by a gigantic margin. Trolls on DCUM have no effect on voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Democrat but Vindman is a loser. People want to hear about bread and butter issues, not his personal grudge against some faraway dictator.

He will be fine on bread and butter issues, and he has foreign policy and executive experience that can be helpful in the Congress.

In what way is "executive experience" relevant to service in the legislative branch? Also most Americans dgaf about foreign policy. Vindman's "strengths" are not really strengths at all. We'd be better off with some random two term state rep.

[Anonymous]

If Vindman is the only thing standing in between us and Putin/Drumpf dictatorship, why didn't Spanberger endorse him in the primary? She's a sharp and patriotic girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Democrat but Vindman is a loser. People want to hear about bread and butter issues, not his personal grudge against some faraway dictator.

He will be fine on bread and butter issues, and he has foreign policy and executive experience that can be helpful in the Congress.

In what way is "executive experience" relevant to service in the legislative branch? Also most Americans dgaf about foreign policy. Vindman's "strengths" are not really strengths at all. We'd be better off with some random two term state rep.

Define “we.” Where do you live?