Vindman in VA-7: how badly will he lose?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just glad to see other former judge advocates speaking truth on here about his fledgling, lackluster military career. By my count there’s 3-4 of us. I am willing to bet if you ask any JA who worked with him pre-Trump they would all identify him as mediocre and unpleasant. It is why he was passed-over to LTC. The DNC-funded, outsider campaign manager just hopes people
buy Yev’s version of himself.

I am a judge advocate and know multiple JAs that were passed over on their initial look for LTC that are now COLs. Selection is a matter of numbers, timing, and luck. One thing that stands out is that he was selected for COL - with a selection rate of 30%. So the selection board - which consists of both regular branch and JAs - found his performance to be in the top 30% of all LTCs. That means the selection board found him to be much above average towards superior.

But I doubt you, or your fictional friends, are judge advocates. If you were, you’d understand the selection process and what it means. You failed to state your rank, so it sounds like sour grapes to me. Sorry you didn’t get selected for COL.

And the year he came out on the O6 list it was very delayed because he was not actually on it - he was rightfully passed over to LTC. He then was made an SJA after filing a whistleblower complaint. He was an ad law chief post grad course, received not good paper, but then did not supervise any JAs from then to when he was made an O6 and given an SJA gig that allowed him to not move. Because he wanted to stay in the DC area and also wanted premiere assignments - it was and still is all about him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just glad to see other former judge advocates speaking truth on here about his fledgling, lackluster military career. By my count there’s 3-4 of us. I am willing to bet if you ask any JA who worked with him pre-Trump they would all identify him as mediocre and unpleasant. It is why he was passed-over to LTC. The DNC-funded, outsider campaign manager just hopes people
buy Yev’s version of himself.

I am a judge advocate and know multiple JAs that were passed over on their initial look for LTC that are now COLs. Selection is a matter of numbers, timing, and luck. One thing that stands out is that he was selected for COL - with a selection rate of 30%. So the selection board - which consists of both regular branch and JAs - found his performance to be in the top 30% of all LTCs. That means the selection board found him to be much above average towards superior.

But I doubt you, or your fictional friends, are judge advocates. If you were, you’d understand the selection process and what it means. You failed to state your rank, so it sounds like sour grapes to me. Sorry you didn’t get selected for COL.

And the year he came out on the O6 list it was very delayed because he was not actually on it - he was rightfully passed over to LTC. He then was made an SJA after filing a whistleblower complaint. He was an ad law chief post grad course, received not good paper, but then did not supervise any JAs from then to when he was made an O6 and given an SJA gig that allowed him to not move. Because he wanted to stay in the DC area and also wanted premiere assignments - it was and still is all about him.

Did he receive not good paper, Boris?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just glad to see other former judge advocates speaking truth on here about his fledgling, lackluster military career. By my count there’s 3-4 of us. I am willing to bet if you ask any JA who worked with him pre-Trump they would all identify him as mediocre and unpleasant. It is why he was passed-over to LTC. The DNC-funded, outsider campaign manager just hopes people
buy Yev’s version of himself.

I am a judge advocate and know multiple JAs that were passed over on their initial look for LTC that are now COLs. Selection is a matter of numbers, timing, and luck. One thing that stands out is that he was selected for COL - with a selection rate of 30%. So the selection board - which consists of both regular branch and JAs - found his performance to be in the top 30% of all LTCs. That means the selection board found him to be much above average towards superior.

But I doubt you, or your fictional friends, are judge advocates. If you were, you’d understand the selection process and what it means. You failed to state your rank, so it sounds like sour grapes to me. Sorry you didn’t get selected for COL.

And the year he came out on the O6 list it was very delayed because he was not actually on it - he was rightfully passed over to LTC. He then was made an SJA after filing a whistleblower complaint. He was an ad law chief post grad course, received not good paper, but then did not supervise any JAs from then to when he was made an O6 and given an SJA gig that allowed him to not move. Because he wanted to stay in the DC area and also wanted premiere assignments - it was and still is all about him.

Wrong. You are obviously not an Army JA. You don’t even know the correct acronym for Lieutenant Colonel. In the Army it’s LTC. You called him Lt. Col. in an earlier post. That’s the acronym for an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.

He was on the promotion list for O-6 (COL). The list was delayed because someone in congress wasn’t happy that he reported what was happening in the White House to his chain of command and held up the promotion of the whole COL list. The JAGC stands by their whole list and will not remove names. It’s never the case of a delay to add another name. It’s only when congress will not accept the whole lot and wants someone removed that a list is delayed.

Your description of his SJA job is incorrect and nonsensical. A Staff Judge Advocate is the chief attorney of a legal office. The SJA is the leader of all the attorneys in the office. An SJA identifier is only for office that has a group in which to lead. He had to have supervised other attorneys - that’s inherent with the position.

You don’t even lie well. Just stop. Stop bashing JAs on a mommy blog.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just glad to see other former judge advocates speaking truth on here about his fledgling, lackluster military career. By my count there’s 3-4 of us. I am willing to bet if you ask any JA who worked with him pre-Trump they would all identify him as mediocre and unpleasant. It is why he was passed-over to LTC. The DNC-funded, outsider campaign manager just hopes people
buy Yev’s version of himself.

I am a judge advocate and know multiple JAs that were passed over on their initial look for LTC that are now COLs. Selection is a matter of numbers, timing, and luck. One thing that stands out is that he was selected for COL - with a selection rate of 30%. So the selection board - which consists of both regular branch and JAs - found his performance to be in the top 30% of all LTCs. That means the selection board found him to be much above average towards superior.

But I doubt you, or your fictional friends, are judge advocates. If you were, you’d understand the selection process and what it means. You failed to state your rank, so it sounds like sour grapes to me. Sorry you didn’t get selected for COL.

And the year he came out on the O6 list it was very delayed because he was not actually on it - he was rightfully passed over to LTC. He then was made an SJA after filing a whistleblower complaint. He was an ad law chief post grad course, received not good paper, but then did not supervise any JAs from then to when he was made an O6 and given an SJA gig that allowed him to not move. Because he wanted to stay in the DC area and also wanted premiere assignments - it was and still is all about him.

Wrong. You are obviously not an Army JA. You don’t even know the correct acronym for Lieutenant Colonel. In the Army it’s LTC. You called him Lt. Col. in an earlier post. That’s the acronym for an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.

He was on the promotion list for O-6 (COL). The list was delayed because someone in congress wasn’t happy that he reported what was happening in the White House to his chain of command and held up the promotion of the whole COL list. The JAGC stands by their whole list and will not remove names. It’s never the case of a delay to add another name. It’s only when congress will not accept the whole lot and wants someone removed that a list is delayed.

Your description of his SJA job is incorrect and nonsensical. A Staff Judge Advocate is the chief attorney of a legal office. The SJA is the leader of all the attorneys in the office. An SJA identifier is only for office that has a group in which to lead. He had to have supervised other attorneys - that’s inherent with the position.

You don’t even lie well. Just stop. Stop bashing JAs on a mommy blog.

I know his entire post grad course assignment history. Ad law in Europe, then senior trial counsel (non supervisory (not a rater of anyone)), labor law - again not a rater of anyone, NSC, futures command DEVCOM (0 assigned uniformed JAs), then SJA. He retired early before his 3 years time in grade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just glad to see other former judge advocates speaking truth on here about his fledgling, lackluster military career. By my count there’s 3-4 of us. I am willing to bet if you ask any JA who worked with him pre-Trump they would all identify him as mediocre and unpleasant. It is why he was passed-over to LTC. The DNC-funded, outsider campaign manager just hopes people
buy Yev’s version of himself.

I am a judge advocate and know multiple JAs that were passed over on their initial look for LTC that are now COLs. Selection is a matter of numbers, timing, and luck. One thing that stands out is that he was selected for COL - with a selection rate of 30%. So the selection board - which consists of both regular branch and JAs - found his performance to be in the top 30% of all LTCs. That means the selection board found him to be much above average towards superior.

But I doubt you, or your fictional friends, are judge advocates. If you were, you’d understand the selection process and what it means. You failed to state your rank, so it sounds like sour grapes to me. Sorry you didn’t get selected for COL.

And the year he came out on the O6 list it was very delayed because he was not actually on it - he was rightfully passed over to LTC. He then was made an SJA after filing a whistleblower complaint. He was an ad law chief post grad course, received not good paper, but then did not supervise any JAs from then to when he was made an O6 and given an SJA gig that allowed him to not move. Because he wanted to stay in the DC area and also wanted premiere assignments - it was and still is all about him.

Wrong. You are obviously not an Army JA. You don’t even know the correct acronym for Lieutenant Colonel. In the Army it’s LTC. You called him Lt. Col. in an earlier post. That’s the acronym for an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.

He was on the promotion list for O-6 (COL). The list was delayed because someone in congress wasn’t happy that he reported what was happening in the White House to his chain of command and held up the promotion of the whole COL list. The JAGC stands by their whole list and will not remove names. It’s never the case of a delay to add another name. It’s only when congress will not accept the whole lot and wants someone removed that a list is delayed.

Your description of his SJA job is incorrect and nonsensical. A Staff Judge Advocate is the chief attorney of a legal office. The SJA is the leader of all the attorneys in the office. An SJA identifier is only for office that has a group in which to lead. He had to have supervised other attorneys - that’s inherent with the position.

You don’t even lie well. Just stop. Stop bashing JAs on a mommy blog.

I know his entire post grad course assignment history. Ad law in Europe, then senior trial counsel (non supervisory (not a rater of anyone)), labor law - again not a rater of anyone, NSC, futures command DEVCOM (0 assigned uniformed JAs), then SJA. He retired early before his 3 years time in grade.

Many of those assignments were as a Major. Leadership isn’t a requirement at that grade for promotion. Senior trial counsel is the team lead of all the trial counsel, and they try their own cases. It is a technically difficult assignment and requires development of junior litigators. One of the most demanding that I had in my career. Labor law is reserved for litigators since it’s one of only a few assignments where you try cases outside of military justice. Also a technically difficult assignment. His assignments show he was a good litigator with progressively more difficult litigation assignments.

The JAGC would never send an idiot to NSC. Futures command is a solid assignment and working to shape the battlefield of the future.

I’m glad you have a copy of his ORB, but that doesn’t say anything about his service. You don’t understand the importance/difficulty of his assignments. You’re an internet fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just glad to see other former judge advocates speaking truth on here about his fledgling, lackluster military career. By my count there’s 3-4 of us. I am willing to bet if you ask any JA who worked with him pre-Trump they would all identify him as mediocre and unpleasant. It is why he was passed-over to LTC. The DNC-funded, outsider campaign manager just hopes people
buy Yev’s version of himself.

I am a judge advocate and know multiple JAs that were passed over on their initial look for LTC that are now COLs. Selection is a matter of numbers, timing, and luck. One thing that stands out is that he was selected for COL - with a selection rate of 30%. So the selection board - which consists of both regular branch and JAs - found his performance to be in the top 30% of all LTCs. That means the selection board found him to be much above average towards superior.

But I doubt you, or your fictional friends, are judge advocates. If you were, you’d understand the selection process and what it means. You failed to state your rank, so it sounds like sour grapes to me. Sorry you didn’t get selected for COL.

And the year he came out on the O6 list it was very delayed because he was not actually on it - he was rightfully passed over to LTC. He then was made an SJA after filing a whistleblower complaint. He was an ad law chief post grad course, received not good paper, but then did not supervise any JAs from then to when he was made an O6 and given an SJA gig that allowed him to not move. Because he wanted to stay in the DC area and also wanted premiere assignments - it was and still is all about him.

Wrong. You are obviously not an Army JA. You don’t even know the correct acronym for Lieutenant Colonel. In the Army it’s LTC. You called him Lt. Col. in an earlier post. That’s the acronym for an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.

He was on the promotion list for O-6 (COL). The list was delayed because someone in congress wasn’t happy that he reported what was happening in the White House to his chain of command and held up the promotion of the whole COL list. The JAGC stands by their whole list and will not remove names. It’s never the case of a delay to add another name. It’s only when congress will not accept the whole lot and wants someone removed that a list is delayed.

Your description of his SJA job is incorrect and nonsensical. A Staff Judge Advocate is the chief attorney of a legal office. The SJA is the leader of all the attorneys in the office. An SJA identifier is only for office that has a group in which to lead. He had to have supervised other attorneys - that’s inherent with the position.

You don’t even lie well. Just stop. Stop bashing JAs on a mommy blog.

I know his entire post grad course assignment history. Ad law in Europe, then senior trial counsel (non supervisory (not a rater of anyone)), labor law - again not a rater of anyone, NSC, futures command DEVCOM (0 assigned uniformed JAs), then SJA. He retired early before his 3 years time in grade.

Many of those assignments were as a Major. Leadership isn’t a requirement at that grade for promotion. Senior trial counsel is the team lead of all the trial counsel, and they try their own cases. It is a technically difficult assignment and requires development of junior litigators. One of the most demanding that I had in my career. Labor law is reserved for litigators since it’s one of only a few assignments where you try cases outside of military justice. Also a technically difficult assignment. His assignments show he was a good litigator with progressively more difficult litigation assignments.

The JAGC would never send an idiot to NSC. Futures command is a solid assignment and working to shape the battlefield of the future.

I’m glad you have a copy of his ORB, but that doesn’t say anything about his service. You don’t understand the importance/difficulty of his assignments. You’re an internet fraud.

He was not a labor law litigator - “policy” somewhere buried in OGC. Senior trial counsel is when he tried to bully junior, much more competent and capable trial counsel (women). He was never the sole senior trial counsel - he was a co-STC. Not a fraud. Did you ever work with him? Are you him? You’ve not once denied the truth about everything I’ve said. He was a mediocre, lackluster, and self-obsessed Judge advocate. That’s ok. Many mediocre, self-obsessed veterans are in Congress.

[Anonymous]

This is all true. Vindman is only about himself. His winning tomorrow is bad for the Democratic Party.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/eugene-vindman-primary-democrats-virginia-trump-b2563707.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is all true. Vindman is only about himself. His winning tomorrow is bad for the Democratic Party.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/eugene-vindman-primary-democrats-virginia-trump-b2563707.html

Boris (or Natasha, as the case may be), let me give you a little tip to carry with you as you promote your agenda across the English-speaking internet. In English, if you are speaking of the future, your verb tense should reflect that. You may believe (or be paid to declare) that his winning tomorrow will be or would be bad, but we wouldn't say "his winning tomorrow is bad".

I give you "not good paper" for this effort.

[Anonymous]

Oh just end the BS Vindman campaign manager/staffer and/or family member. He is a horrible candidate and is going to lose big.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh just end the BS Vindman campaign manager/staffer and/or family member. He is a horrible candidate and is going to lose big.

You are advocating "ending" a person? In English that refers to murder. Surely that wasn't what you meant, Boris?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh just end the BS Vindman campaign manager/staffer and/or family member. He is a horrible candidate and is going to lose big.

You are advocating "ending" a person? In English that refers to murder. Surely that wasn't what you meant, Boris?

Read it again lib: I wrote "end the BS." Your reading comprehension is no better than dementia Joe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh just end the BS Vindman campaign manager/staffer and/or family member. He is a horrible candidate and is going to lose big.

You are advocating "ending" a person? In English that refers to murder. Surely that wasn't what you meant, Boris?

Read it again lib: I wrote "end the BS." Your reading comprehension is no better than dementia Joe.

Ah, I see. In English, punctuation matters. I don't speak Russian, but I imagine it does in Russian, too?

A comma would have made all the difference.

"End the BS, campaign manager!" is really different from "End the BS campaign manager!"

[Anonymous]

Whatever. In no interpretation would it state ending a person, lib. Nice try. You will lose tomorrow and then lose big in Nov. Try not to cry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever. In no interpretation would it state ending a person, lib. Nice try. You will lose tomorrow and then lose big in Nov. Try not to cry.

I'm not a "lib" and I don't vote in VA. I just really hate disinformation campaigns, especially the ones that benefit hostile foreign governments like Russia's.

Here's what you wrote: "Oh just end the BS Vindman campaign manager/staffer and/or family member." In the absence of a comma or period after "BS", it does in fact advocate for the "end" of a person. Which, may I point out, is a pretty Putin-approved thing to say. I imagine that wasn't what you meant, but you just don't seem to write very well in English.

[Anonymous]

I swear on my kids’ lives that I am not a Russian bot. I’m a rather boring exurb Virginian. I worked alongside Yev, and I just know he is a liar. Most politicians are liars, and this just proves he was-and is-far more politician than Soldier.