SLOs are such a waste of time. More busy work that takes the teacher’s time away from the classroom |
Well, in that case I am distressed. But then again, I shouldn't have been surprised. In other countries they separate kids into vocational, administrative, and scientific tracks. We don't do that here, but it sounds like instead we have an opt-out track for kids that don't want to learn, and an academic track for kids that do. What would be truely distressing is if the opt-out vs academic tracks recreated the racial segregation of pre civil rights times. It's a sensitive question that may get this thread locked, but, are the kids in the hall and the kids in the classrooms or markedly different races? Defacto separate and unequal? |
|
I teach an elective and kids obviously took it thinking itd be the easy "A"...Nope. They kept asking why they had B,C,D,E in the class throughout the first quarter and I'd explain it to them (for example: turning in nothing and not participating isnt an option). The first day of second quarter all of those same kids refused to do anything even after multiple prompts, "And you wonder why you didn't receive an A" lots of shrugs, lots of contempt dirty looks. They do not care. If it requires any amount of effort, they are over it. It's beyond pathetic.
As someone else said, the future is bleak. It's so bad right now. This isn't fear mongering either, this is the absolute truth. |
The latest trend is to not have tracks but to put all students whether advanced or remedial in "honors" classes together. This hamrs the high-achievers but helps reduce the gap so the county can claim they're made progress on something that is otherwise unfixable. |
Um… I’m a teacher. I deal with this DAILY. How can you possibly blame Republicans for ANYTHING as we sit here in super progressive Montgomery County? |
| Well, 'no child left behind' is the reason for all the dumb metrics |
The code of conduct doesn’t allow it. |
They will find anyone or anything to blame rather than taking responsibility. This is the parents who had fits when things went virtual. Then they had fits when things opened and instead of policies as normal they kept the lax policies and its not impacting everyone and everything because they cannot handle or be bothered with their kids and principals and admin are too lazy to be adults and handle this stuff as well. |
Left-wing policies resulted in the problems MCPS is having - the whole equity thing, dumbing down everything, passing along kids who don't care. Right-wing policies are responsible for things like 4 day school weeks, not teaching true history, bringing religion into all classes (teaching creationism instead of science, etc.). Two different problems. We are talking about the former not the latter so it is a left-wing problem. |
Y'all sent report cards early?
|
|
All of these folks claiming this side or that side's policies are responsible. Care to provide any reasonable source?
Or is it your own biases speaking? |
I assume this is sarcasm. |
Hey, PP asked how one could possibly blame Republicans for this. I personally wouldn't blame a political party, but blaming 'no child left behind' policies is a legitimate claim. However, I think you're making an error when you say 'they' as in parents are looking to blame anyone. It's not parents complaining in this thread. It's teachers. As a parent, I'm pragmatic, and I'm fine with the two tiered system. If the disruptive kids want to hang out in the hallway, cool, leave my Larlo to take notes in peace. As a citizen, I'm distressed. |
Yep. I'm a Democrat. But the lunatics in office in MoCo are so far left I can't believe we are in the same party. |
The MCDCC thanks you for your post. But even I, as a Democrat, laughed out loud when reading your post. MCPS was one of the best school systems in the country while MoCo was run by Republicans and then moderate Dems. Now that we have leftist lunatics in office implementing insane policies, it's falling like Wil E Coyote and you're blaming the party that hasn't been in control of MoCo in decades. |