Washington County, MD Judge murdered in his driveway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

the evidence is the fact he shot the judge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.

Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

Just search his name in the Maryland judicial database

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.

Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.

We all know what the case was about except for you, you deluded MRA.

here’s a tip: even IF (and that’s a giant IF) Argote was being unfairly called abusive in court, he had every opportunity to prove himself. Courts do not enter permanent orders of no contacr without a lot of chances for the parent to show they are fit. Argote no doubt had many chances. But because he is a violent abuser, he chose violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.



https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/

What’s the names of the attorneys involved? This case has all the red flags of legal malpractice.

What red flags? Where is the malpractice?

red flag = Man files divorce on 6/6/22. Woman files domestic violence cliam on 6/12/23.

[Anonymous]

Meant DV claimed on 6/12/22 not 6/12/23.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.

Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.

We know what the case was all about because the defendant shot the judge in the case. That's really all she wrote to the world, other than your weird and unpleasant little corner of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.



https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/

What’s the names of the attorneys involved? This case has all the red flags of legal malpractice.

What red flags? Where is the malpractice?

red flag = Man files divorce on 6/6/22. Woman files domestic violence cliam on 6/12/23.

The Hill article explains the timeline and it's not even remotely suggestive of what you are claiming. Language from the judge's ruling at that time as well.

Maybe inform yourself before running around making these arguments in defense of domestically violent abusers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.

Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.

We all know what the case was about except for you, you deluded MRA.

here’s a tip: even IF (and that’s a giant IF) Argote was being unfairly called abusive in court, he had every opportunity to prove himself. Courts do not enter permanent orders of no contacr without a lot of chances for the parent to show they are fit. Argote no doubt had many chances. But because he is a violent abuser, he chose violence.

The ruling in this particular case suggests that the wife of the alleged shooter may have adduced persuasive evidence of him not being safe for the children to be around. Nonetheless, it is never for the non-movant to prove anything. They may need to rebut a prima facie case, but it is the party seeking relief that has the burden of proof, showing unfitness, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

I read that the wife had originally gotten a protective order or something similar and tried to leave in 2012. So there is a long history here.

post the transcripts and the pleadings.

So are you suggesting that the judge deserved to be shot? Are you Argote? Maybe Jeff should turn his IP logs over to the police.

Get the media to publish the transcripts and the pleadings so we can see what this case was all about.

We all know what the case was about except for you, you deluded MRA.

here’s a tip: even IF (and that’s a giant IF) Argote was being unfairly called abusive in court, he had every opportunity to prove himself. Courts do not enter permanent orders of no contacr without a lot of chances for the parent to show they are fit. Argote no doubt had many chances. But because he is a violent abuser, he chose violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meant DV claimed on 6/12/22 not 6/12/23.

He didn't let her leave the house. She took the opportunity that she had to file DV. I can't believe you are defending this monster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meant DV claimed on 6/12/22 not 6/12/23.

He didn't let her leave the house. She took the opportunity that she had to file DV. I can't believe you are defending this monster.

Well, not that I’m a fan, but this alleged “monster” is entitled to a presumption of innocence, and the alleged abuse claims, at least so far as I’ve seen in the news, appear to have been she said/he said.