Washington County, MD Judge murdered in his driveway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought Judges had 24/7/365 security teams? How’s this even possible ?

No. A county circuit judge does not have round the clock security. Most federal judges do not have this. What gave you this idea?

I dunno. Movies? Movies always show judges surrounded by teams of bodyguards and others patrolling outside their homes.

I was also surprised when that Texas congressman was carjacked a couple weeks ago that he didn’t have a team of security people.

The vast vast majority of congressmen get no security whatsoever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We live in a world where many believe they can do what they want without consequence and anyone trying to impose consequence should be punished. The rules don’t apply to them. They have never been told no.

The murderer’s wife warned that the guy was dangerous.

post the transcript or court record to support this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figures authorities, even in MD, would let a domestic abuser keep his gun.

He was ordered to surrender the firearm. When the abuse claim was withdrawn by the complainant he would have been permitted to retrieve it. He was never adjudicated a “domestic abuser” until perhaps the day the judge ruled in the custody case.

that’s the problem. I custody case and a domestic violence case are two very different types of cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We live in a world where many believe they can do what they want without consequence and anyone trying to impose consequence should be punished. The rules don’t apply to them. They have never been told no.

The murderer’s wife warned that the guy was dangerous.

post the transcript or court record to support this.

He was in court for a domestic. I will shout this into the void: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE needs to be taken more seriously. Nearly every violent criminal and mass shooter has a history of DV that wasn’t appropriately punished before their other crimes. Listen to women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We live in a world where many believe they can do what they want without consequence and anyone trying to impose consequence should be punished. The rules don’t apply to them. They have never been told no.

The murderer’s wife warned that the guy was dangerous.

post the transcript or court record to support this.

He was in court for a domestic. I will shout this into the void: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE needs to be taken more seriously. Nearly every violent criminal and mass shooter has a history of DV that wasn’t appropriately punished before their other crimes. Listen to women.

I’m hear I listen. That’s why I asked for the transcript. So I can listen to what the wife said about the abuse she and the children experienced.

[Anonymous]

Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.



https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.



https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/

Such a tragedy due to an armed, controlling, hot headed husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The police calls to their house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maryland Case Search:

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=C21FM22000697&loc=59&detailLoc=ODYCIVIL

Forgot to add his domestic violence case:
https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=D112FM22000322&loc=39&detailLoc=DV

So why did he still have a gun.

NO ONE protects women in this country.

They protect men's supposed right to have a gun.

SO SICK of this.

The plaintiff dropped the charges. During the time the DV case was pending he was not to have access to weapons. Victims need to follow through on the charges. It's a tough situation, but necessary.

where is the evidence of abuse to the wife and children?

The entire reason that the ex-wife got sole custody of the kids and the house and why the judge said he had to have no contact with them was because he had a history of domestic violence. Are you serious? That’s why he lost the kids and his house and why he went and killed the judge that ruled in his ex-wife’s favor.

+1

Must be a troll asking those ridiculous questions.

[Anonymous]

Ironic that this monster proves the judge right with this gesture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.



https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/

What’s the names of the attorneys involved? This case has all the red flags of legal malpractice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Article below has the most details Of the case in any media article I’ve seen.



https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/ap-a-maryland-circuit-court-judge-was-fatally-shot-in-the-driveway-of-his-home-police-say/

What’s the names of the attorneys involved? This case has all the red flags of legal malpractice.

What red flags? Where is the malpractice?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We live in a world where many believe they can do what they want without consequence and anyone trying to impose consequence should be punished. The rules don’t apply to them. They have never been told no.

The murderer’s wife warned that the guy was dangerous.

post the transcript or court record to support this.

He was in court for a domestic. I will shout this into the void: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE needs to be taken more seriously. Nearly every violent criminal and mass shooter has a history of DV that wasn’t appropriately punished before their other crimes. Listen to women.

I can’t find my source for this. I might’ve read it or seen it on TV or heard it on a podcast but one of the most dangerous situations for police officers are domestic violence situations. The chances of the car, becoming physically violent either towards the domestic partner, or the police officers are much higher than other types of calls. In this case this guy murdered a judge. I agree domestic violence should be taking much more seriously.