Thomas Jefferson High School drops to 5th in latest US News ranking

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omg.

Everyone is freaking out about this but the schools they are #1-4 have <300 kids.

IN THE ENTIRE SCHOOL.

One of them has only two grades: 11-12th.

One of them has like 132 kids.

Of course if your school has 132 kids it’s going to be amazing.

TJ 1300+ kids. It’s not even comparable.

You’re like looking at a preschool enrollment vs a high school enrollment. Some of them don’t even have sat scores.

It’s so obvious the us news did this for the clicks.


"Everyone" is 1 or 2 people. I can't believe more than that are so stupid in the same incoherent way.

BTW, TJ has 1900 kids.


I was on my phone and didn’t triple check- sorry.

But I think it’s a lot more based on other forums and comment boards. Like literally a lot of people who just assumed it’s TJ going down instead of random metrics skewing the data.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.


Sure, let's just ignore the fact that Asian American students with stronger merit credentials were denied admission. No racial manipulation of outcomes going on here.


It could be that the Asians being admitted now are not as high caliber as the ones admitted before. So this group would score worse compared to other Asians, or at least not as well as previous classes did. TJ's USA score would drop here.
Anonymous
Amazingly, so many people in this forum believe discrimination and war on meritocracy are good for our country.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What really happened? How much of this is FCPS' own doing?

https://www.insidenova.com/headlines/thomas-jefferson-high-school-drops-to-5th-in-latest-us-news-ranking/article_b4ce2886-4692-11ee-a98b-4b0dbcb840c2.html


The ranking of colleges is specious enough. Ranking of high schools is a whole new level of stupid.

Ok, I know it’s not “new” but it is completely useless.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Elite Virginia high school sees national ranking drop amid racial equality legal fight

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/education/thomas-jefferson-high-school-ranking-drop-us-news

In 2020, Fairfax County's school board voted to overhaul the admissions process to eliminate some testing requirements and implement a lottery system


Ah, right wing media doing bad faith reporting as usual. The causation insinuated in that headline is wild.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.



But a high ranking is the goal. To the parents.
The fact that their child's education is excellent, that US News rankings don't really matter and that the article says there's little difference between 5th and 1st doesn't matter.
The rankings matter so the parents can feel superior.


And this is why TJ is such a healthier place now - they've begun replacing the parents. The kids selected by the old process have never been the problem.


How's TJ healthier now? Why suppressing the parents (the tax payers) is a good thing?


The focus is moving away from prestige and individualism and in the direction of a complete education that prepares students to collaborate with a 21st century population.


So, implementing discrimination and parent suppression would achieve that. Wow


Race is not considered during the admissions process.

And Asians have the highest rate and number of admissions. So...

No discrimination.

Don't lie. The main reason to keep changing the admission process is to engineer the racial demographic


Nope. It was to provide opportunities to kids from ALL middle schools.


You cannot get free rides all the time. At some point in your life you have to work hard to get ahead.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.


Sure, let's just ignore the fact that Asian American students with stronger merit credentials were denied admission. No racial manipulation of outcomes going on here.


I guess the school board members are not Asians. No equality there.


Rachna Sizemore Heiser (South Asian American) and Abrar Omeish (West Asian American) would disagree. And they represent the entire county as At-Large members.


I have never heard of West Asian American being used to describe Arabs. Did you make that up? Genuinely curious.


That shows how good our school education is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.



But a high ranking is the goal. To the parents.
The fact that their child's education is excellent, that US News rankings don't really matter and that the article says there's little difference between 5th and 1st doesn't matter.
The rankings matter so the parents can feel superior.


And this is why TJ is such a healthier place now - they've begun replacing the parents. The kids selected by the old process have never been the problem.


How's TJ healthier now? Why suppressing the parents (the tax payers) is a good thing?


The focus is moving away from prestige and individualism and in the direction of a complete education that prepares students to collaborate with a 21st century population.


So, implementing discrimination and parent suppression would achieve that. Wow


Race is not considered during the admissions process.

And Asians have the highest rate and number of admissions. So...

No discrimination.

Don't lie. The main reason to keep changing the admission process is to engineer the racial demographic


Nope. It was to provide opportunities to kids from ALL middle schools.


You cannot get free rides all the time. At some point in your life you have to work hard to get ahead.


It's a public school that serves as the magnet for a whole region. If you don't like that, pay for private. After all, you can't get free rides all the time
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.


Sure, let's just ignore the fact that Asian American students with stronger merit credentials were denied admission. No racial manipulation of outcomes going on here.


I guess the school board members are not Asians. No equality there.


Rachna Sizemore Heiser (South Asian American) and Abrar Omeish (West Asian American) would disagree. And they represent the entire county as At-Large members.


I have never heard of West Asian American being used to describe Arabs. Did you make that up? Genuinely curious.


The liberals love to make up stuff to fit their narratives.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.



But a high ranking is the goal. To the parents.
The fact that their child's education is excellent, that US News rankings don't really matter and that the article says there's little difference between 5th and 1st doesn't matter.
The rankings matter so the parents can feel superior.


And this is why TJ is such a healthier place now - they've begun replacing the parents. The kids selected by the old process have never been the problem.


How's TJ healthier now? Why suppressing the parents (the tax payers) is a good thing?


The focus is moving away from prestige and individualism and in the direction of a complete education that prepares students to collaborate with a 21st century population.


So, implementing discrimination and parent suppression would achieve that. Wow


Race is not considered during the admissions process.

And Asians have the highest rate and number of admissions. So...

No discrimination.

Don't lie. The main reason to keep changing the admission process is to engineer the racial demographic


Nope. It was to provide opportunities to kids from ALL middle schools.


You cannot get free rides all the time. At some point in your life you have to work hard to get ahead.


It's a public school that serves as the magnet for a whole region. If you don't like that, pay for private. After all, you can't get free rides all the time


This is a magnet school. If you don't like to work hard, why go there?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.



But a high ranking is the goal. To the parents.
The fact that their child's education is excellent, that US News rankings don't really matter and that the article says there's little difference between 5th and 1st doesn't matter.
The rankings matter so the parents can feel superior.


And this is why TJ is such a healthier place now - they've begun replacing the parents. The kids selected by the old process have never been the problem.


How's TJ healthier now? Why suppressing the parents (the tax payers) is a good thing?



The focus is moving away from prestige and individualism and in the direction of a complete education that prepares students to collaborate with a 21st century population.


So, implementing discrimination and parent suppression would achieve that. Wow


Race is not considered during the admissions process.

And Asians have the highest rate and number of admissions. So...

No discrimination.

Don't lie. The main reason to keep changing the admission process is to engineer the racial demographic


Nope. It was to provide opportunities to kids from ALL middle schools.


You cannot get free rides all the time. At some point in your life you have to work hard to get ahead.


It's a public school that serves as the magnet for a whole region. If you don't like that, pay for private. After all, you can't get free rides all the time


This is a magnet school. If you don't like to work hard, why go there?


Why are you assuming the kids attending don't like to work hard? Public school students can only take classes and join clubs that their schools offer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.



But a high ranking is the goal. To the parents.
The fact that their child's education is excellent, that US News rankings don't really matter and that the article says there's little difference between 5th and 1st doesn't matter.
The rankings matter so the parents can feel superior.


And this is why TJ is such a healthier place now - they've begun replacing the parents. The kids selected by the old process have never been the problem.


How's TJ healthier now? Why suppressing the parents (the tax payers) is a good thing?


The focus is moving away from prestige and individualism and in the direction of a complete education that prepares students to collaborate with a 21st century population.


So, implementing discrimination and parent suppression would achieve that. Wow


Race is not considered during the admissions process.

And Asians have the highest rate and number of admissions. So...

No discrimination.

Don't lie. The main reason to keep changing the admission process is to engineer the racial demographic


Nope. It was to provide opportunities to kids from ALL middle schools.


You cannot get free rides all the time. At some point in your life you have to work hard to get ahead.


It's a public school that serves as the magnet for a whole region. If you don't like that, pay for private. After all, you can't get free rides all the time


This is a magnet school. If you don't like to work hard, why go there?


Sadly, you still don't want to put any effort into anything.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What really happened? How much of this is FCPS' own doing?

https://www.insidenova.com/headlines/thomas-jefferson-high-school-drops-to-5th-in-latest-us-news-ranking/article_b4ce2886-4692-11ee-a98b-4b0dbcb840c2.html


The ranking of colleges is specious enough. Ranking of high schools is a whole new level of stupid.

Ok, I know it’s not “new” but it is completely useless.


It's imprecise, but far from completely useless, and the US News methodology is more sensible than something like the current Great Schools methodology.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.



But a high ranking is the goal. To the parents.
The fact that their child's education is excellent, that US News rankings don't really matter and that the article says there's little difference between 5th and 1st doesn't matter.
The rankings matter so the parents can feel superior.


And this is why TJ is such a healthier place now - they've begun replacing the parents. The kids selected by the old process have never been the problem.


How's TJ healthier now? Why suppressing the parents (the tax payers) is a good thing?



The focus is moving away from prestige and individualism and in the direction of a complete education that prepares students to collaborate with a 21st century population.


So, implementing discrimination and parent suppression would achieve that. Wow


Race is not considered during the admissions process.

And Asians have the highest rate and number of admissions. So...

No discrimination.

Don't lie. The main reason to keep changing the admission process is to engineer the racial demographic


Nope. It was to provide opportunities to kids from ALL middle schools.


You cannot get free rides all the time. At some point in your life you have to work hard to get ahead.


It's a public school that serves as the magnet for a whole region. If you don't like that, pay for private. After all, you can't get free rides all the time


This is a magnet school. If you don't like to work hard, why go there?


Why are you assuming the kids attending don't like to work hard? Public school students can only take classes and join clubs that their schools offer.


Not all the kids attending, especially those who work hard and have all the credentials. The one who doesn't cry for entitlement.
Only the lazy kids who just want a quota for them to get in TJ.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter when the rankings were made. People have already said TJ's scores will go down because they are no longer selecting for students who do well on tests. A high ranking is not the goal.

However, scores might go up, since someone posted above that the scores are compared to the expectations based on the racial makeup of the school. With more blacks and Hispanics, who will presumably outperform the typical black and Hispanic student. the test rankings might go up.



But a high ranking is the goal. To the parents.
The fact that their child's education is excellent, that US News rankings don't really matter and that the article says there's little difference between 5th and 1st doesn't matter.
The rankings matter so the parents can feel superior.


And this is why TJ is such a healthier place now - they've begun replacing the parents. The kids selected by the old process have never been the problem.


How's TJ healthier now? Why suppressing the parents (the tax payers) is a good thing?


The focus is moving away from prestige and individualism and in the direction of a complete education that prepares students to collaborate with a 21st century population.


So, implementing discrimination and parent suppression would achieve that. Wow


Race is not considered during the admissions process.

And Asians have the highest rate and number of admissions. So...

No discrimination.

Don't lie. The main reason to keep changing the admission process is to engineer the racial demographic


Nope. It was to provide opportunities to kids from ALL middle schools.


You cannot get free rides all the time. At some point in your life you have to work hard to get ahead.


It's a public school that serves as the magnet for a whole region. If you don't like that, pay for private. After all, you can't get free rides all the time


Public school is probably free for you. I pay a lot of tax for the public school. Yes, TAX. Ring a bell?
Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Go to: