Anonymous wrote:
But on the other hand, we just went through a very extended period of "get your schooling on the internet!" and the primary lesson from that was that mainly the students who got noticeable benefit out of online school were the ones who weren't struggling, and students who were going to be struggling even in an in-person setting got bupkis from online school.
And in many cases, the kids who would benefit the most from tutoring have the least access when it is only available online--kids in high-poverty schools whose families primarily access the internet through parent phones, for example.
Required after-hours tutoring for students below a certain level in reading or math--with transportation available--would get a lot more takers than tutor.com in my opinion. But that's way more expensive than an online subscription to tutors who haven't even been minimally trained by the school system to be familiar with their approaches.