Timeline for TJ case?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Read the brief. |
Anonymous
It's not bad. There are some parts that are unintentionally arguing for the other side but not as much as I was expecting. Also, the "self-inflicted" part was illogical and nonsensical. But not bad, overall. |
Anonymous
It could have been written, pretty much word-for-word, by C4TJ. There isn't anything new in this. Miyares is already under fire for breaking the law with illegal campaign contributions - his word doesn't carry a whole lot of weight anymore. He probably should have stayed on the sidelines. |
Anonymous
Huh... doesn't matter who wrote it or what Miyares did or didn't do. This is the brief. Objectivity my friend. Sometimes, I wonder... |
Anonymous
Seems a bit of a climb down.. |
Anonymous
You can read the brief, and tell us your thoughts. |
Anonymous
I did. If you did, you'll know what I am talking about. |
Anonymous
|
So, pretty speedy.
Thanks Fourth Circuit. |
Anonymous
Apparently it wasn't very compelling |
Anonymous
| Great. So back to the discriminatory admissions process that does not select the students with highest aptitude for math and science |
Anonymous
Just for this year. This is just the order about the stay for this year's admissions. The appeal has not been decided. |
Anonymous
| Appeal will be heard in September on an expedited basis. |