|
Are women this naive?
Of course, men can be wildly in love and still want to have sex with basically every hot woman in the world. So of course the can. Whether they will depends on a lot of factors |
It’s bit about naïveté. It’s about setting standards for yourself and those around you, and meeting them. I guess that is ok behavior to model for your kids? |
It wasn’t about her. Cheaters often cheat for issues inside of themselves that have absolutely nothing to do with their partner. |
| Men are more prone to casual and opportunistic cheating, which plays a big part in why they get caught. For women, however, cheating may be evidence of a more thought-out plan to address their perceived needs. |
| INFIDELITY is not about LOVE but about a personal need system out of wack, an inability to set boundaries, a sense of entitlement, an addiction problem, unresolved internal tension from a long time ago, a deep-seated belief of inadequacy plus more.” |
Pretty much. It sure feels like love though. |
|
I have posted this before, but I promise women if we shot you up with a typical dose of male testosterone, you wouldn't be so philosophical about why men cheat.
All this stuff about broken homes and absent fathers, or narcissist and ego are pseudoscience. If you want to know men's natural sexual proclivity look at the gay community where there are no women to serve as gatekeeper. I am not excusing infidelity, you should try to honor a commitment to monogamy. |
| I disagree PP. Having a higher need for sex due to more testosterone is plausible but obtaining it via lying to your partner is not. |
Right, I didn't say cheating was justified. Only that men can love deeply but the need to have sex with women other than your wife is always there. It's just hormones |
I guess you’re saying that definition of love is different for men vs. women? Love typically does include trust and honesty, but maybe that’s not the case for men because of hormones? You don’t need trust and honesty? Men would be ok with women cheating in that case? |
This is the real answer but they aren't ready to hear it. |
In a nutshell: these women and the men with whom they are sleeping are personality-disordered, hoebag trash. |
Eh, it is the rare (and probably unhealthy) relationship where all needs are met through one person. Finding means to have needs met outside the relationship while still remaining committed to the relationship makes sense. |
Contrary to what most of you are saying, I am a woman who was in love with my husband, and I had an affair. Our marriage was not great at the time due to work/financial/kids/moving out of state etc stress (aka the usual life stuff), but I loved him. I was having my own personal self esteem/unworthiness crisis and sought approval from other very high status men. I didn’t even so much actively seek attention as I did accept attention from these men. A more self-confident, grounded, self-aware, thoughtful woman would typically fend off this common unwanted attention, as we do on a daily basis. When was invited over I accepted under the guise of friendship. I wanted to be wanted by some high status people/men. Turned out of course they just wanted sex, and I got tangled up in emotions along the way. Of course I lost my marriage to my wonderful hardworking husband along the way. Don’t do it, people. If you love your spouse, reign in all of your broken-ness so you don’t inadvertently destroy your family. Lust and your personal issues can literally blind (limerence, cold vs hot emotional states) you to your real priority in life- your family. |
For the purpose of this discussion, the question is does commitment mean your spouse should be OK with how you’re meeting those needs outside, or anything goes? |