Early Predictions 2028: AOC, Whitmer, Newsome or …?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who are we working toward?

Mark Kelly is the Democrat nominee for president in 2028.

[Anonymous]

Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Biden is still eligible for a second term...

[Anonymous]

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/09/us/politics/kamala-harris-interview-107-days-book-2028.html?unlocked_article_code=1.7U8.b1YV.Gl6qeXRgaUoO&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Kamala needs to sit down. She blew it. And she comes off as out of touch and arrogant.

The country is heading away from MAGA thank god. All you coastal elites who think Pete is the answer need to sit down and let a populist win, stop tanking our chances by letting the party machine pick another AIPAC candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

[Anonymous]

Gretchen Whitmer is rah-rah MAGA oligarchy behind closed doors. How could anyone of the Left support this disgusting phony? Trump is "literally Hitler," yet Whitmer is tripping over herself to meet and flirt with him. Of course all the Whitmer shills will claim this is 5 dimensional chess.

"Publicly, she said she hid because she was not happy to be there. Privately, she signed a copy of the newspaper bearing the photo the next time she visited, and joked about the affair, according to the two White House officials. The autographed gift has not been previously reported."

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/02/she-might-be-trumps-favorite-democrat-00672214

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gretchen Whitmer is rah-rah MAGA oligarchy behind closed doors. How could anyone of the Left support this disgusting phony? Trump is "literally Hitler," yet Whitmer is tripping over herself to meet and flirt with him. Of course all the Whitmer shills will claim this is 5 dimensional chess.

"Publicly, she said she hid because she was not happy to be there. Privately, she signed a copy of the newspaper bearing the photo the next time she visited, and joked about the affair, according to the two White House officials. The autographed gift has not been previously reported."

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/02/she-might-be-trumps-favorite-democrat-00672214

Right after this broke, the Democratic Governors Association just made Whitmer vice chair. Red team, blue team... same team. Establishment theater for the gullible masses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

Searching for an electable GOP or Dem nominee who isn't corrupted by mega-donors in some form or fashion is a wild goose chase in this day and age. The lesser of all evils is all we can hope for and let's be honest; anyone not named Trump will be a lesser evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

Searching for an electable GOP or Dem nominee who isn't corrupted by mega-donors in some form or fashion is a wild goose chase in this day and age. The lesser of all evils is all we can hope for and let's be honest; anyone not named Trump will be a lesser evil.

DP. Nope. I am not settling for whoever the Dems leadership and consultant class roll out. Israel, AIPAC and Trump are all the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

Searching for an electable GOP or Dem nominee who isn't corrupted by mega-donors in some form or fashion is a wild goose chase in this day and age. The lesser of all evils is all we can hope for and let's be honest; anyone not named Trump will be a lesser evil.

DP. Nope. I am not settling for whoever the Dems leadership and consultant class roll out. Israel, AIPAC and Trump are all the same.

I'm with you, my friend. 2028 will be a repeat of 2020 and 2024 when the incumbent party is all but guaranteed to lose due to the extremely unpopular sitting POTUS. Dem voters need to follow their hearts and ignore the narratives crafted to sway favor towards mega-donor preferred candidates. It's very unlikely the GOP will be able to separate itself from Trump in time to put forth a viable nominee by 2028 so it will be up to the Dems to give us the adequate leader we've been lacking since 2017. Let's hope to see a dozen or so well qualified and serious candidates competing in the 2028 Dem primary on a level playing field with mega-donor influence muted or ignored by Dem voters.

We, as a country, need to elect someone in 2028 with legitimate presidential leadership skills who can be respected by 90% of Americans and consistently approved of by at least 50% of Americans. There are Obamas, Clintons, GHWBs, and Reagans out there in this country of 340 million people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

Searching for an electable GOP or Dem nominee who isn't corrupted by mega-donors in some form or fashion is a wild goose chase in this day and age. The lesser of all evils is all we can hope for and let's be honest; anyone not named Trump will be a lesser evil.

DP. Nope. I am not settling for whoever the Dems leadership and consultant class roll out. Israel, AIPAC and Trump are all the same.

I'm with you, my friend. 2028 will be a repeat of 2020 and 2024 when the incumbent party is all but guaranteed to lose due to the extremely unpopular sitting POTUS. Dem voters need to follow their hearts and ignore the narratives crafted to sway favor towards mega-donor preferred candidates. It's very unlikely the GOP will be able to separate itself from Trump in time to put forth a viable nominee by 2028 so it will be up to the Dems to give us the adequate leader we've been lacking since 2017. Let's hope to see a dozen or so well qualified and serious candidates competing in the 2028 Dem primary on a level playing field with mega-donor influence muted or ignored by Dem voters.

We, as a country, need to elect someone in 2028 with legitimate presidential leadership skills who can be respected by 90% of Americans and consistently approved of by at least 50% of Americans. There are Obamas, Clintons, GHWBs, and Reagans out there in this country of 340 million people.

Politics in the US have become so toxic that normal, smart, emotionally healthy people don't choose politics as a profession. It's an absolute freak show these days.

Obama, Bush, Reagan were the last ones to be vaguely normal. But they had charisma and were relatable. Trump is a freak show. And so is Newsom, who seems to be leading things among Democrats.

There is not a lot of space in American politics for intelligent and thoughtful people today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

Searching for an electable GOP or Dem nominee who isn't corrupted by mega-donors in some form or fashion is a wild goose chase in this day and age. The lesser of all evils is all we can hope for and let's be honest; anyone not named Trump will be a lesser evil.

DP. Nope. I am not settling for whoever the Dems leadership and consultant class roll out. Israel, AIPAC and Trump are all the same.

I'm with you, my friend. 2028 will be a repeat of 2020 and 2024 when the incumbent party is all but guaranteed to lose due to the extremely unpopular sitting POTUS. Dem voters need to follow their hearts and ignore the narratives crafted to sway favor towards mega-donor preferred candidates. It's very unlikely the GOP will be able to separate itself from Trump in time to put forth a viable nominee by 2028 so it will be up to the Dems to give us the adequate leader we've been lacking since 2017. Let's hope to see a dozen or so well qualified and serious candidates competing in the 2028 Dem primary on a level playing field with mega-donor influence muted or ignored by Dem voters.

We, as a country, need to elect someone in 2028 with legitimate presidential leadership skills who can be respected by 90% of Americans and consistently approved of by at least 50% of Americans. There are Obamas, Clintons, GHWBs, and Reagans out there in this country of 340 million people.

Politics in the US have become so toxic that normal, smart, emotionally healthy people don't choose politics as a profession. It's an absolute freak show these days.

Obama, Bush, Reagan were the last ones to be vaguely normal. But they had charisma and were relatable. Trump is a freak show. And so is Newsom, who seems to be leading things among Democrats.

There is not a lot of space in American politics for intelligent and thoughtful people today.

This says more about us than it says about them. In the grand scheme of things, we chose this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

Searching for an electable GOP or Dem nominee who isn't corrupted by mega-donors in some form or fashion is a wild goose chase in this day and age. The lesser of all evils is all we can hope for and let's be honest; anyone not named Trump will be a lesser evil.

DP. Nope. I am not settling for whoever the Dems leadership and consultant class roll out. Israel, AIPAC and Trump are all the same.

You are why people like trump got elected

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will pay any price for a democrat president who:
-goes for jogs with secret service
-seems normal, appears to cares about people in general
-stays out of the headlines except maybe once per week
-currently has high popularity, which would drop during the campaign, but hold steady at 55-60%

Would Andy Beshear check these boxes?

Dp. Not unless he walks away from AIPAC

https://www.trackaipac.com/2028

Searching for an electable GOP or Dem nominee who isn't corrupted by mega-donors in some form or fashion is a wild goose chase in this day and age. The lesser of all evils is all we can hope for and let's be honest; anyone not named Trump will be a lesser evil.

Nope. Hear me now, Dems. I won’t vote for a Dem that is aligned with AIPAC or big business. Might as well vote for a Republican then.