Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

Garland had to come out and speak because so much misinformation was being vomited into the mediasphere.

For example, regarding whether Garland personally approved the search, Bill Arkin, who used to be a good reporter, wrote something for Newsweek claiming Garland didn't know the search was happening.

Newsweek isn’t a thing. It’s reduced to clickbait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In early June he was asked to padlock the room. He heard nothing else and then the raid.I find it VERY hard to see how this shows that the DOJ had no other way to enforce the subpoena. This is a political witch hunt and it is going to be very hard for Garland to ever be viewed as a-political again. This is banana republic communist type stuff and if you can't see it, you are the people who were fine with things like Chernobyl and pograms and death camps. You are the ones who are so allegiant to your party and not to principles of freedom and democracy.

He was subpoenaed first!!!!
Subpoena Preceded Search Warrant in Push to Retrieve Material From Trump

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/us/politics/trump-fbi-subpoena.html

Uhh. You are so thick. They asked him to put a lock on it. And he did and showed confirmation of the lock. That implies they will tell him what to do with the documents next. And they didn't. And they didn't come back until the raid. I mean, let's assume all the material is classified. If so, H=he SHOULD keep them safe and they should only be transferred to those with an appropriate clearance with appropriate chain of custody. He can't just put the documents in the mail or send them with UPS. SO if it is true that DOJ said "put a lock on them" and he did that, then if they didn't follow up with more instruction and jumped to a raid, this is crazy.

This is daft. The documents were required to be returned pursuant to a valid subpoena, notwithstanding the fact it was illegal to remove them in the first instance. Trump opted to keep classified materials in a non secured faculty for months thereafter. His lawyers could have notified NARA, or better yet NSD, at any time to come collect the documents. They chose not to take steps necessary to protect a national security risk. This comes in the wake of a spate of stories of unauthorized copies of NSA materials being sent to the WH in the last days of the administration by hacks Patel and Cohen-Watnick.

Years ago I worked at a defense contractor. One of our employees took a bunch of classified documents home. When we found out, we immediately reported it to DoD as we were required to do. The FBI was at her house within 24 hours with a warrant. No negotiations, no subpoenas. They just kicked in her door and took the documents back. She also lost her clearance and we fired her. Don't know if she was prosecuted. That's what happens to normal people who do this stuff. Trump got velvet glove treatment.

Yup, I know of similar situation except the person accidentally took an electronic form of documents home. Didn’t matter that it was unintentional. Lost their job, clearance and feds were at their house immediately as well.

They bent over backwards to get trump to return the documents quietly. He brought this on himself.

Should he have mailed them? Isn't it their job to get them back physically?

Gaslighters Anonymous has a meeting tonight

I'm serious. Did they come to pick them up from Mar A Lago and were turned away?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

What do you mean "admit"? Didn't everyone assume he personally signed off? It would have been a shocker if he hadn't.

Wray was taking the hit, as was the judge. Again, why four days?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

Garland had to come out and speak because so much misinformation was being vomited into the mediasphere.

For example, regarding whether Garland personally approved the search, Bill Arkin, who used to be a good reporter, wrote something for Newsweek claiming Garland didn't know the search was happening.

When you do something so unprecedented, you tell the American people why that day. Waiting four days allows misinformation to flourish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

And how many days did Trump have to return the stolen docs? Hmmm?

Why didn't Garland address the nation Monday?

The DOJ traditionally speaks through motions.
But RWNJ’s have been foaming at the mouth encouraging
Idiots to take up arms against FBI agents.
So…. Here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FFS. After four days of MAGAworld selfflaggelation TFG now exploring whether to oppose the motion to unseal. Poor Tom Fitton about to enjoy the underside of the crosstown bus.

Warrant will tell nothing. Affidavit is what's wanted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

Most normal people assumed he had signed or at least been aware of the warrant.

He should have said nothing to preserve the investigation and protect the privacy of the former president.

But with the conspiracy theories floating around and the former pres stoking the flames, I guess he had to come out to try to stop the wildest stories. But whatever - it isn’t going to work. Maga base are not rational.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, here is the thing. IF this is a big deal and shows Trump was colluding with Russia (which is what all you LWNJ are saying), then why has it been all nicey nicey for weeks between Trump and DOJ until now. If, on the other hand, this is about returning documents to the national archives, then this is so much overreach that it is in fact the bullying of a potential political rival. Garland said the warrant was necessary because it wasn't possible to any other route. He is saying that this was the ONLY way to move ahead. Garland just put himself into a tiny box.

My interpretation of that this statement is that Trump was asked to cooperate and refused.

But he hasn't refused. In fact, he was cooperating with them.

What does this mean? You and I take a bunch of TS files home, nobody is giving us chances to “bring them back” or “cooperate”.

Let’s review shall we? They discovered he had left with documents. They produced a subpoena to look for items. They removed the items earlier in the year. They realized there was still missing stuff. They asked again nicely via subpoena. Trump said “maybe, but I guess you can put a padlock on it”. So the FBI goes and asks for a warrant because what the heck else were they supposed to do.

Can I have the source for this? A direct quote would be good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

Garland had to come out and speak because so much misinformation was being vomited into the mediasphere.

For example, regarding whether Garland personally approved the search, Bill Arkin, who used to be a good reporter, wrote something for Newsweek claiming Garland didn't know the search was happening.

When you do something so unprecedented, you tell the American people why that day. Waiting four days allows misinformation to flourish.

The FBI didn’t do anything unprecedented. They asked, subpoenaed, got a SW, and got the stuff.
They followed the rule of law.
The unprecedented thing is Trump stealing documents. THAT’S THE UNUSUAL CRIME HERE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

Most normal people assumed he had signed or at least been aware of the warrant.

He should have said nothing to preserve the investigation and protect the privacy of the former president.

But with the conspiracy theories floating around and the former pres stoking the flames, I guess he had to come out to try to stop the wildest stories. But whatever - it isn’t going to work. Maga base are not rational.

I personally think it was Fitton and the NY paper that finally got him in front of the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

And how many days did Trump have to return the stolen docs? Hmmm?

Why didn't Garland address the nation Monday?

He is not legally required to do so, my precious. He said today that he waited for Trump to talk about it first, which implies Garland would not have spoken if Trump had kept his mouth shut - it is the policy of DOJ to say as little as possible about active investigations as possible. But given Trump had his little whine-fest, and triggered morons like you, Garland decided he could give a presser. You'll notice that true to DOJ policy, he gave as little info as humanely possible.

And when YOU run afoul of the law, he will offer you the same courtesy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

What do you mean "admit"? Didn't everyone assume he personally signed off? It would have been a shocker if he hadn't.

Wray was taking the hit, as was the judge. Again, why four days?

Why ever? There's no timeline because normally the FBI and DOJ don't explain themselves. Because normally respectable politicians don't say dumb loony stuff on behalf TFG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

Most normal people assumed he had signed or at least been aware of the warrant.

He should have said nothing to preserve the investigation and protect the privacy of the former president.

But with the conspiracy theories floating around and the former pres stoking the flames, I guess he had to come out to try to stop the wildest stories. But whatever - it isn’t going to work. Maga base are not rational.

I personally think it was Fitton and the NY paper that finally got him in front of the public.

Doubtful. There was no point in maintaining silence and let Trumpmand his merry band of minions spin a false narrative that seeks to further undermine the rule of law, at least as applied to the Gropenfuhrer. .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, here is the thing. IF this is a big deal and shows Trump was colluding with Russia (which is what all you LWNJ are saying), then why has it been all nicey nicey for weeks between Trump and DOJ until now. If, on the other hand, this is about returning documents to the national archives, then this is so much overreach that it is in fact the bullying of a potential political rival. Garland said the warrant was necessary because it wasn't possible to any other route. He is saying that this was the ONLY way to move ahead. Garland just put himself into a tiny box.

My interpretation of that this statement is that Trump was asked to cooperate and refused.

But he hasn't refused. In fact, he was cooperating with them.

What does this mean? You and I take a bunch of TS files home, nobody is giving us chances to “bring them back” or “cooperate”.

Let’s review shall we? They discovered he had left with documents. They produced a subpoena to look for items. They removed the items earlier in the year. They realized there was still missing stuff. They asked again nicely via subpoena. Trump said “maybe, but I guess you can put a padlock on it”. So the FBI goes and asks for a warrant because what the heck else were they supposed to do.

Can I have the source for this? A direct quote would be good.

The subpoena for these records was over a month ago. Some of the stuff was classified information. What else is one supposed to assume Trump is saying other than “maybe”. I will take him at his word that he didn’t just say “no.”

Again, if it was you or me, we wouldn’t have had an opportunity for a month to ignore a subpoena requiring the return of highly classified information that we had improperly taken.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Garland was smoked out. And personally approved the raid.

Smoked out implies he did something wrong. He didn’t.

Took him four days - FOUR DAYS to come out and admit that he personally signed off.

Garland had to come out and speak because so much misinformation was being vomited into the mediasphere.

For example, regarding whether Garland personally approved the search, Bill Arkin, who used to be a good reporter, wrote something for Newsweek claiming Garland didn't know the search was happening.

When you do something so unprecedented, you tell the American people why that day. Waiting four days allows misinformation to flourish.

This is how things are supposed to work in a healthy democracy with the two principal political parties committed to the rule of law and free and fair elections. We are no longer that country.