new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

On Twitter there’s a screen shot of the charge against her, the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess.

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?

Just against Tara Reade for check fraud committed by Reade only.

But how do you know it’s THE Tara Reade? Is there only one in the USA?

There are 600 people named Ronald Reagan in the USA, should I assume the ex president got a speeding ticket in Ohio because I saw that name on a court case?

You think there was more than one Tara Reade in San Luis Obispo County, CA in 1993? Her address is I’m sure part of the court record.

I have no idea if there were 1 or 10 people with that name in CA in 1993. That screen shot does not show an address.

There are 2 Ronald Reagan’s currently in Damascus. Can you tell me which one ran the stop sign based on the court record?

You missed me saying that I’m sure there’s an address somewhere in the court record.

[Anonymous]

DP. It’s relevant to know that the statute code, 476A, is apparently for check fraud.

https://www.shouselaw.com/bad-checks-laws.html

This isn’t just about bouncing a check, which no court cares about. There must be “willful intent” to defraud. See the explanations on the link.

[Anonymous]

Pretty damning. The case against joe Biden gets stronger and stronger.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/05/tara_reades_case_just_got_stronger_with_a_newly_discovered_legal_document.html

Christine hazy Ford this Tara reade is not.

Or a Julie **snort** Swetnick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pretty damning. The case against joe Biden gets stronger and stronger.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/05/tara_reades_case_just_got_stronger_with_a_newly_discovered_legal_document.html

Christine hazy Ford this Tara reade is not.

Or a Julie **snort** Swetnick.

Not really. "Sexual harassment" is such a broad term, it covers both her current story and conflicting stories she told previously that didn't even directly involve Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pretty damning. The case against joe Biden gets stronger and stronger.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/05/tara_reades_case_just_got_stronger_with_a_newly_discovered_legal_document.html

Christine hazy Ford this Tara reade is not.

Or a Julie **snort** Swetnick.

Not really. "Sexual harassment" is such a broad term, it covers both her current story and conflicting stories she told previously that didn't even directly involve Biden.

+1. We’re been through this. Sexual harassment is not necessarily the same as sexual assault. Your article speculating that they are the same doesn’t make it true. Especially since her husband in this filing apparently ran through her life history including the fact that she also says her dad molested her.

[Anonymous]

Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

No it is clear she said something happened. Unfortunately she is the boy who cried wolf, so now nobody is believing her.

Believable Americans are not Putin worshipers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

No it is clear she said something happened. Unfortunately she is the boy who cried wolf, so now nobody is believing her.

Believable Americans are not Putin worshipers.

Documentation from 1993 prove your statement false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

It’s clear she told her mother and her ex that something happened when worked for Joe Biden, but she’s such an incredibly unreliable narrator that I’m starting to think it was all an elaborate cover for when she was fired for check kiting and didn’t want to tell anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

It’s clear she told her mother and her ex that something happened when worked for Joe Biden, but she’s such an incredibly unreliable narrator that I’m starting to think it was all an elaborate cover for when she was fired for check kiting and didn’t want to tell anyone.

That’s the speculation on some parts of the internet—that she lost her job for check fraud (and this may not have been the first time she did it), but she didn’t want to tell the truth to her mom or boyfriend.

Who knows. I want to see more on the check fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

No it is clear she said something happened. Unfortunately she is the boy who cried wolf, so now nobody is believing her.

Believable Americans are not Putin worshipers.

Documentation from 1993 prove your statement false.

Hardly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

It’s clear she told her mother and her ex that something happened when worked for Joe Biden, but she’s such an incredibly unreliable narrator that I’m starting to think it was all an elaborate cover for when she was fired for check kiting and didn’t want to tell anyone.

Right. If the check thing is indeed her, then she probably invented the whole thing from the beginning to cover for being canned.

That would explain the evolving story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

It’s clear she told her mother and her ex that something happened when worked for Joe Biden, but she’s such an incredibly unreliable narrator that I’m starting to think it was all an elaborate cover for when she was fired for check kiting and didn’t want to tell anyone.

That’s the speculation on some parts of the internet—that she lost her job for check fraud (and this may not have been the first time she did it), but she didn’t want to tell the truth to her mom or boyfriend.

Who knows. I want to see more on the check fraud.

I am betting the check fraud thing is a red herring.
Otherwise, Biden's office would have stated this from the get-go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line here..... with the Mother's call to the talk show and the court records from her ex, it is clear SOMETHING happened when she worked for Joe Biden.

What exactly? We may never know. But to say it is "out of character" for Biden is a stretch since we have tons of pictures and video of him being "handsey."

Oh, and liberals continue to be hypocrites about this whole thing.

It’s clear she told her mother and her ex that something happened when worked for Joe Biden, but she’s such an incredibly unreliable narrator that I’m starting to think it was all an elaborate cover for when she was fired for check kiting and didn’t want to tell anyone.

That’s the speculation on some parts of the internet—that she lost her job for check fraud (and this may not have been the first time she did it), but she didn’t want to tell the truth to her mom or boyfriend.

Who knows. I want to see more on the check fraud.

I am betting the check fraud thing is a red herring.
Otherwise, Biden's office would have stated this from the get-go.

Biden’s office had a ton of contraindicating stuff from the get-go, including how her story changed constantly. They limited themselves to personal statements from three of his former staffers saying they didn’t remember anything she said. Reade had personally identified these former staffers, so it’s almost like she forced them to speak out.

Also, new stuff comes up all the time. I doubt they knew about this recent discovery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

On Twitter there’s a screen shot of the charge against her, the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess.

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?

Just against Tara Reade for check fraud committed by Reade only.

But how do you know it’s THE Tara Reade? Is there only one in the USA?

There are 600 people named Ronald Reagan in the USA, should I assume the ex president got a speeding ticket in Ohio because I saw that name on a court case?

You think there was more than one Tara Reade in San Luis Obispo County, CA in 1993? Her address is I’m sure part of the court record.

I have no idea if there were 1 or 10 people with that name in CA in 1993. That screen shot does not show an address.

There are 2 Ronald Reagan’s currently in Damascus. Can you tell me which one ran the stop sign based on the court record?

You missed me saying that I’m sure there’s an address somewhere in the court record.

Everything quoted above is about "a screen shot of the charges against her" all I asked was based on that screenshot how do we know it is in fact her and not someone with the same name? We don’t have the court records, we have a screenshot with no address or even a middle initial.