new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Reade calling for Biden to drop out, but not for Trump who has 25 accusations?

I agree. Strange statement. Raises questions about motives. Lets say her story is 100%, even the hands-pants part. Does she honestly think one incident from decades ago should disqualify anyone from running for office? Obviously huge numbers of politicians have done worse, repeatedly so. To my MeToo friends, should these types of incidents be treated differently or the same as other bad acts, whether securities violations, fraud charges, FBI lies, etc? Let the voters decide.

She says he is claiming to be something he is not - moral and ethical.

So, back to the top post: does she think Trump IS moral and ethical? Why does she claim sexual assault matters and why, given her own experience coming forward, does she ignore the 25 other women with claims like hers? I’d settle for “these need to be investigated too” but she didn’t even give us that.

Yeah, yeah. She doesn’t care about Trump, she just wants Bernie to replace Biden. Is there any conclusion besides this? I guess it’s also possible she’s getting paid by the Trump campaign. Pick your poison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

On Twitter there’s a screen shot of the charge against her, the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess.

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Reade calling for Biden to drop out, but not for Trump who has 25 accusations?

I agree. Strange statement. Raises questions about motives. Lets say her story is 100%, even the hands-pants part. Does she honestly think one incident from decades ago should disqualify anyone from running for office? Obviously huge numbers of politicians have done worse, repeatedly so. To my MeToo friends, should these types of incidents be treated differently or the same as other bad acts, whether securities violations, fraud charges, FBI lies, etc? Let the voters decide.

She says he is claiming to be something he is not - moral and ethical.

Simplistic statement. Most people, including me, have moral or ethical weaknesses. Hopefully, we overcome them, etc. So, I say yes. Biden is a very moral and dedicated public servant with the right perspective and attitude. Foregoing does not mean he is perfect, of course. And I confident that, with some research, we can find not to be entirely moral or ethical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

Because she wants attention, but of course does not understand what she will be receiving in terms of attention. Lots of people do stupid thing. We have a Little Boy in the WH who has spent his entire life seeking, demanding, trying to maintain attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

Mental illness is my guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

My spouse had to let someone go for something similar to this. No one else in office knew reason why person left. Because privacy issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a drama lama and completely unbelievable. Lies everywhere she goes.

If your boss, husband and father have all "assaulted" you,
Are lying trailer trash and belong on "Tiger King."

Most victims of childhood abuse get abused by others as well throughout their lives. Your post is pretty offensive to the survivors.

Stop already. Reade lied.

+1. Check your talking points. Not even Fox or Tucker is defending her anymore.

Does that quote say Reade, or anyone that gets abused by multiple people? Anyone that has been abused by more than one person is "lying trailer trash" is what they wrote. Why would you defend that statement?

Because that PP is herself, lying trailer trash. It’s beyond tiresome.
-DP

Except it's not a "her"

Who cares. Lying trailer trash isn’t gender specific.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a drama lama and completely unbelievable. Lies everywhere she goes.

If your boss, husband and father have all "assaulted" you,
Are lying trailer trash and belong on "Tiger King."

Bookmarking this post (and so many others). Can’t wait to quote it the next time you’re defending some nutter who falsely accuses a Republican.

Ugh, you extremists on both sides are like the Hatfields and the McCoys. You can't debate the merits of any current argument or allegations, all you can do is divert by going back through the last 20-something years of political history with accusations of "but your side..."

Every conversation seems to devolve into an analysis of what the other side did before and it drowns out any discussion of the current situation.

Maybe because the past informs the present? Just a thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

On Twitter there’s a screen shot of the charge against her, the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess.

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?

Just against Tara Reade for check fraud committed by Reade only.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a drama lama and completely unbelievable. Lies everywhere she goes.

If your boss, husband and father have all "assaulted" you,
Are lying trailer trash and belong on "Tiger King."

Most victims of childhood abuse get abused by others as well throughout their lives. Your post is pretty offensive to the survivors.

Stop already. Reade lied.

+1. Check your talking points. Not even Fox or Tucker is defending her anymore.

Does that quote say Reade, or anyone that gets abused by multiple people? Anyone that has been abused by more than one person is "lying trailer trash" is what they wrote. Why would you defend that statement?

Not that PP but...

Reade is a demonstrated liar. Reade demonstrably lied in her Biden claim and in other areas of her life. Not even Tucker or Fox is still claiming Reade has a valid claim.

Are you saying we can't call a liar what she is? Oh right, that's exactly what you're doing with this shrill "media hypocrisy" schtick that backfires on you every time you try to use it.

We can call a liar a liar, no issue there. Did you see the video on this thread where Biden is caught lying about his education? So Biden lied "in other areas of his life". It's on video .He is a demonstrated liar

Think all lies are equal, do you?

No honey, that dress doesn't make you look fat.

No honey, I didn't kill anyone.

Yes, EXACTLY THE SAME MORAL LEVEL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Krystal Ball interviewed Reade 42 days ago and has been hammering mainstream neoliberals for their response to this matter. I admire the integrity of many on the left.

Krystal Ball is a Sanders supporter who hates Biden. She doesn't care about Reade or #metoo. She just wants to get rid of Biden.

I would not question her motives or integrity.

I wouldn't give her any kudos either.

Who names their kid, “Krystal Ball”??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Krystal Ball interviewed Reade 42 days ago and has been hammering mainstream neoliberals for their response to this matter. I admire the integrity of many on the left.

Krystal Ball is a Sanders supporter who hates Biden. She doesn't care about Reade or #metoo. She just wants to get rid of Biden.

I would not question her motives or integrity.

I wouldn't give her any kudos either.

Who names their kid, “Krystal Ball”??

One of the more valid questions on the last few pages of this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

On Twitter there’s a screen shot of the charge against her, the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess.

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?

Just against Tara Reade for check fraud committed by Reade only.

But how do you know it’s THE Tara Reade? Is there only one in the USA?

There are 600 people named Ronald Reagan in the USA, should I assume the ex president got a speeding ticket in Ohio because I saw that name on a court case?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

On Twitter there’s a screen shot of the charge against her, the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess.

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?

Just against Tara Reade for check fraud committed by Reade only.

But how do you know it’s THE Tara Reade? Is there only one in the USA?

There are 600 people named Ronald Reagan in the USA, should I assume the ex president got a speeding ticket in Ohio because I saw that name on a court case?

You think there was more than one Tara Reade in San Luis Obispo County, CA in 1993? Her address is I’m sure part of the court record.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she lie? Why? What possible reason is there for her to go through this hell? Her whole life has been ruined. She's dealing with constant death threats. Do people realize how rare it is for somebody to make up charges likes this?

Again, why would somebody lie about this?

And, if she was released because of check fraud, wouldn't the people working in his office at the time who have been interviewed by media remember this?
Something smells fishy about the check fraud story.

On Twitter there’s a screen shot of the charge against her, the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess.

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?

Just against Tara Reade for check fraud committed by Reade only.

But how do you know it’s THE Tara Reade? Is there only one in the USA?

There are 600 people named Ronald Reagan in the USA, should I assume the ex president got a speeding ticket in Ohio because I saw that name on a court case?

You think there was more than one Tara Reade in San Luis Obispo County, CA in 1993? Her address is I’m sure part of the court record.

I have no idea if there were 1 or 10 people with that name in CA in 1993. That screen shot does not show an address.

There are 2 Ronald Reagan’s currently in Damascus. Can you tell me which one ran the stop sign based on the court record?