So what kind of King will Charles be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Camilla’s non royal family participates then Harry and wife should participate.

Why would an American participate in a coronation?

Camilla’s kids didn’t just bag $100M by selling family secrets (of which they surely know many) to the highest bidders.

How on earth would you know what Camilla’s kids did? Doesn’t her son work in publishing or as a writer that is close to the whole rota set?

Are you saying we wouldn't know about a best seller written by the Parker Bowles kids exposing royal secrets?

Writing a best seller isn’t the only way to spill secrets. I would have thought that was common sense but…I guess not. Although you are write that they certainly didn’t just bag $100M.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Camilla’s non royal family participates then Harry and wife should participate.

Why would an American participate in a coronation?

Camilla’s kids didn’t just bag $100M by selling family secrets (of which they surely know many) to the highest bidders.

How on earth would you know what Camilla’s kids did? Doesn’t her son work in publishing or as a writer that is close to the whole rota set?

Yes. He’s a writer, his area is food, and one of the publications he’s worked with is The Mail on Sunday — which, along with the Daily Mail, specializes in tawdry royal gossip, with royal fashion thrown in. The gossip is usually attributed to “insiders” rather than specific people willing to speak on record. So, yeah, it would be interesting to know what exactly he does to earn his pay.

So cute that you assume these folks depend on paychecks to fund their lifestyles.

DP. Both of his parents are still alive so no inheritance. Harry and Andrew both seemed pretty “broke” in a similar life stage. And the lifestyle is incredibly expensive so who knows if getting some walking around money for some gossip about someone he isn’t friends with might bridge a gap here and there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The latest article is that Charles has directed Kate to not wear anything that might draw attention to herself. He hates it when attention is pulled away from him toward the fashion choices of women in the family. He also doesn’t like that her popularity numbers are so high.

He’s petty, selfish and petulant. He’s married to his affair partner. He’s dumb and surrounds himself with sycophants. So yeah, it’s not going to turn out well.

He doesn’t want Kate to upstage Camilla.

Most people DGAF what Camilla wants. Her victory lap is as distasteful as she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles is such a sucker. Really hard to respect anything about the man who wanted to be Camilla’s tampon.

He made a joke. If anything it makes him seem more human and likable because he has a sense of humor. Unlike the people who didn't understand or can't take a joke.

I'm not the PP you responded to but you sound so desperate . If anything his tampon reveals a serious lack of self awareness ( to the surprise of exactly no one ) and decorum. That you think it somehow makes him more likable says less about him and more about ass kissers like you.

His phone was hacked. You sound desperate to cling to a story you don’t even understand. Lighten up.

Charles and Camilla had the tampon conversation in 1989. When both were married to other people and had young kids.

It’s really trashy behavior, Royal or not.

So, people with kids aren't allowed to make jokes? I'm sure you would never make any kind of joke you sound utterly devoid of humor. One can only imagine what you say in your private conversations. You better hope they never see the light of day.

My undemanding is that Charles was telling Camilla how much he wished he was her tampon because he'd be pummeling her old a s s all day everyday. He had one of the most beautiful women as his wife and he was flirting in a trashy way with another trash

Love is love, right? And your understanding of what he said is not correct and ridiculous. Diana has been dead 25 years, it's way past time to move on. This is what he said:

Charles told Camilla he wished he could live in her "trousers," so as to be close to her at all times. She retorted that the prince could be reincarnated as "a pair of knickers," to which he joked that, knowing his "luck," he'd end up as a tampon instead.

It's a joke and you're bent out of shape out of something you clearly didn't understand or know the background of.

They were still married to their respective spouses when this conversation took place.

They're trash. You're trash for agreeing with it even if it happened 2 decades ago.

Oh no! Not trash! I'm so hurt by an uptight prude like you hung up on a joke that went over her head.

An uptight prude is someone who agrees with being faithful loyal and moral?

That was a nasty inappropriate joke. Couples today divorce because of sex ting . This was no different.

Inappropriate joke? Let it go. If he wasn't who he was he would have married the person he wanted all along. These are not normal people with the same freedoms and choice. He was in an arranged marriage and it didn't work out. Are you for love or not? Love conquers all.

So that gives someone the right to hurt others? NO!

Are you a child? They were in a miserable marriage. This is ancient history.

Then get a DIVORCE before you fool around.

They both fooled around while married.

Agree, both horrible people with no morals or ethics.

Yes, Charles, Diana and Camilla all cheated.

Charles was cheating with Camilla from the beginning of his relationship with Diana. There’s no way Charles and Camilla come out looking good. And who can blame Diana for wanting some affection in her life.

Oh so it was ok to not get a divorce in her case. Why is that? Why didn’t she divorce him? Maybe for the same reasons he couldn’t divorce her.

She didn't divorce him because she had children with him most likely and she had no backing or support from her family to ahead and do it. Charles was a grown ass man and camilla was and still is an old ho bag.

You really let this old lady get under your skin. How bizarre.

And yet, the PPs characterization is accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Camilla’s non royal family participates then Harry and wife should participate.

Why would an American participate in a coronation?

Camilla’s kids didn’t just bag $100M by selling family secrets (of which they surely know many) to the highest bidders.

How on earth would you know what Camilla’s kids did? Doesn’t her son work in publishing or as a writer that is close to the whole rota set?

Yes. He’s a writer, his area is food, and one of the publications he’s worked with is The Mail on Sunday — which, along with the Daily Mail, specializes in tawdry royal gossip, with royal fashion thrown in. The gossip is usually attributed to “insiders” rather than specific people willing to speak on record. So, yeah, it would be interesting to know what exactly he does to earn his pay.

So cute that you assume these folks depend on paychecks to fund their lifestyles.

And even cuter that you rely on your own assumptions instead of reading comprehension in your lust to attempt a pithy comment. Shrug

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Camilla’s non royal family participates then Harry and wife should participate.

Why would an American participate in a coronation?

Camilla’s kids didn’t just bag $100M by selling family secrets (of which they surely know many) to the highest bidders.

How on earth would you know what Camilla’s kids did? Doesn’t her son work in publishing or as a writer that is close to the whole rota set?

Are you saying we wouldn't know about a best seller written by the Parker Bowles kids exposing royal secrets?

Writing a best seller isn’t the only way to spill secrets. I would have thought that was common sense but…I guess not. Although you are write that they certainly didn’t just bag $100M.

I didn’t write that. I just think you’re talking out your ass

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Camilla’s non royal family participates then Harry and wife should participate.

Why would an American participate in a coronation?

Camilla’s kids didn’t just bag $100M by selling family secrets (of which they surely know many) to the highest bidders.

How on earth would you know what Camilla’s kids did? Doesn’t her son work in publishing or as a writer that is close to the whole rota set?

Yes. He’s a writer, his area is food, and one of the publications he’s worked with is The Mail on Sunday — which, along with the Daily Mail, specializes in tawdry royal gossip, with royal fashion thrown in. The gossip is usually attributed to “insiders” rather than specific people willing to speak on record. So, yeah, it would be interesting to know what exactly he does to earn his pay.

So cute that you assume these folks depend on paychecks to fund their lifestyles.

And even cuter that you rely on your own assumptions instead of reading comprehension in your lust to attempt a pithy comment. Shrug

These people really seem to have gotten under your skin.

[Anonymous]

New article today that Charles has decided to name William’s rumored affair partner’s husband as a lord in waiting. This will involve Rose and her husband attending royal and state events. It looks like Chuck and Cammie are searching for new outlets to deflect attention from their problems like incompetence and protesters. Or they just like messing with Kate because she’s more popular than they are with the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New article today that Charles has decided to name William’s rumored affair partner’s husband as a lord in waiting. This will involve Rose and her husband attending royal and state events. It looks like Chuck and Cammie are searching for new outlets to deflect attention from their problems like incompetence and protesters. Or they just like messing with Kate because she’s more popular than they are with the public.

That's playing with fire. Kate could give a tearful interview about it and Rose and destroy what's left of the royal's public standing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New article today that Charles has decided to name William’s rumored affair partner’s husband as a lord in waiting. This will involve Rose and her husband attending royal and state events. It looks like Chuck and Cammie are searching for new outlets to deflect attention from their problems like incompetence and protesters. Or they just like messing with Kate because she’s more popular than they are with the public.

That's playing with fire. Kate could give a tearful interview about it and Rose and destroy what's left of the royal's public standing

Doubt she will fight back. Didn’t Camilla already relegate Kate’s parents to entering through the service entrance? They’ll walk all over her.

Rose and Camilla can bond over ways for the other women to get the throne.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New article today that Charles has decided to name William’s rumored affair partner’s husband as a lord in waiting. This will involve Rose and her husband attending royal and state events. It looks like Chuck and Cammie are searching for new outlets to deflect attention from their problems like incompetence and protesters. Or they just like messing with Kate because she’s more popular than they are with the public.

That's playing with fire. Kate could give a tearful interview about it and Rose and destroy what's left of the royal's public standing

Or there is simply no truth to the rumors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New article today that Charles has decided to name William’s rumored affair partner’s husband as a lord in waiting. This will involve Rose and her husband attending royal and state events. It looks like Chuck and Cammie are searching for new outlets to deflect attention from their problems like incompetence and protesters. Or they just like messing with Kate because she’s more popular than they are with the public.

Wow! They are so trashy.

I sometimes wonder if Kate regrets dedicating her life to marrying that clod. The entire thing is just pathetic.

qUeEn CoNsOrT

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New article today that Charles has decided to name William’s rumored affair partner’s husband as a lord in waiting. This will involve Rose and her husband attending royal and state events. It looks like Chuck and Cammie are searching for new outlets to deflect attention from their problems like incompetence and protesters. Or they just like messing with Kate because she’s more popular than they are with the public.

That's playing with fire. Kate could give a tearful interview about it and Rose and destroy what's left of the royal's public standing

Kate would never do that. She believes in the royal family more than any other member.

[Anonymous]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/queen-camilla-king-charles-coronation-invite-jill-biden-rcna78261

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/queen-camilla-king-charles-coronation-invite-jill-biden-rcna78261

I’d love to have one of those invites! Lucky Jill.