Pelosi’s husband assaulted during breakin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now we’ll all get to see who answered the door, and who’s been lying about who answered the door.


Good.

And those who just made shit up about the whole ordeal can apologize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now we’ll all get to see who answered the door, and who’s been lying about who answered the door.


Good.

And those who just made shit up about the whole ordeal can apologize.

Lol. Republicans don’t apologize. They don’t even acknowledge they’re wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now we’ll all get to see who answered the door, and who’s been lying about who answered the door.


Good.

And those who just made shit up about the whole ordeal can apologize.

And if it turns out their speculation was correct?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now we’ll all get to see who answered the door, and who’s been lying about who answered the door.


Good.

And those who just made shit up about the whole ordeal can apologize.

And if it turns out their speculation was correct?

Which one? You guys were fevered, wild eyed loons poking this way and that. Anything to try and pretend that right wing violence isn’t a huge problem.

[Anonymous]

Video has been released

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

I can see why the defense would not want this video released. It is damning.

The only way this guy can plead "not guilty" is by using the insanity defense.

It is disturbing how quickly he was able to break into the home also. I would imagine this would be a well-secured home given who owns it.
It demonstrates to me that it is really up to us to defend ourselves - even if I were to call the police the second I heard someone breaking in - there is no way they could make it to my home in time to take action if someone wants to do harm.

[Anonymous]

ITA.

Why were the Capitol Police not monitoring the home? Even though NP was not there, there should have been at least one officer assigned to her residence.

[Anonymous]

I can't believe the operator is trying to get off the phone. Gahd

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:F*#$ YOU, REPUBLICANS.

F you psychopaths? What?

Are you confused? Rs accused Pelosi of lying about the attack. Clearly his story was truthful. Didn't know the guy, called 911, tried to hold the hammer, but got assaulted by a crazy man.

Look, Skippy. I'm an R and never accused him of lying. So, be a peach and stop lumping everyone together.

There was a lot of discrepancy in the reports coming out. People were confused as to HOW this guy got in, WHO answered the door, and other details. Many people were questioning what really happened.
IOW - Cool your jets.

Actually, there wasn't much confusion but your media purposely injected all sorts of theories into the story, none of which were true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:F*#$ YOU, REPUBLICANS.

F you psychopaths? What?

Are you confused? Rs accused Pelosi of lying about the attack. Clearly his story was truthful. Didn't know the guy, called 911, tried to hold the hammer, but got assaulted by a crazy man.

Look, Skippy. I'm an R and never accused him of lying. So, be a peach and stop lumping everyone together.

There was a lot of discrepancy in the reports coming out. People were confused as to HOW this guy got in, WHO answered the door, and other details. Many people were questioning what really happened.
IOW - Cool your jets.

DP

You all are so disingenuous. The “questioning” was about inserting speculation to undermine the clear reality that someone who had been radicalized by MAGA propaganda inflicted violence on a target demonized by MAGA Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe the operator is trying to get off the phone. Gahd

Get the hint lady. I mean, really!!

[Anonymous]

There was a ton of "confusion" deliberately and falsely manufactured by right wing pundits, like "they were both naked/they were both in their underwear" "he clearly knew the guy" "they were obviously gay lovers" "a third person opened the door" "they both had hammers" "the glass could ONLY have been smashed from the inside" and so on. All completely false and completely disproven by the bodycam video.

The right wing should be very ashamed and embarrassed.

This was a brutal and violent assault by an unhinged lunatic and you all turned it into some kind of sick joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:F*#$ YOU, REPUBLICANS.

F you psychopaths? What?

Are you confused? Rs accused Pelosi of lying about the attack. Clearly his story was truthful. Didn't know the guy, called 911, tried to hold the hammer, but got assaulted by a crazy man.

Look, Skippy. I'm an R and never accused him of lying. So, be a peach and stop lumping everyone together.

There was a lot of discrepancy in the reports coming out. People were confused as to HOW this guy got in, WHO answered the door, and other details. Many people were questioning what really happened.
IOW - Cool your jets.

Actually, there wasn't much confusion but your media purposely injected all sorts of theories into the story, none of which were true.

There was confusion about the guy, not the attack

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ITA.

Why were the Capitol Police not monitoring the home? Even though NP was not there, there should have been at least one officer assigned to her residence.

Capitol Police are assigned to Nancy Pelosi, not to her house in her absence.