Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Considering how much information and evidence was disclosed from TX and MI, and the speed it was released, it seems odd that the one that supposedly triggered the other two is not even being discussed. Even if they thought they had the killer, why didn't they withold evidence from TX and MI in case there was an accomplice? Why are all three cases seemingly case closed when they're all public executions, which are pretty uncommon in the US? I get the Orem prosecutor may want to keep quiet about it but no press conferences and no leaks? What about the defense? Is there no Ben Crump available to control the narrative? Where is the police dept, the hospital, the school, the local and natl media, the witnesses, the neighbors, the "he was so quiet" acquaintances, the former fbi agents doing their expert reenactments, the wannabe local YouTubers prying around? Why are there only edited versions of video from obvious still cameras and why do they only show the non-controversial parts? Why is the wife/CEO/golddigger not telling people to shut up with their conspiracy theories? Why is TPUSA allowing people to threaten Charlie's friends who are being threatened for asking questions? Why do people searching for the truth have to record public proclamations that they are not suicidal and list 99 reasons why they want to, no need to, live--and that if they were to suddenly die.....??? This is ratings gold and there's nothing at all to be 24/7 reported on in a town where the most exciting thing to happen in years was to host Charlie Kirk? |
|
I noticed that initially when word got out that Charlie Kirk was shot and killed…there were many tributes held for his death.
Yet as time has gone on, not even a full month later he is not memorialized so kindly. I think the majority of citizens didn’t know who he was or had even heard of his name. Then after he died he became somewhat of a household name for awhile and people were curious to see what made this guy tick. His legacy consists of numerous videos online where people could decide for themselves if this was a good person or not. What Charlie has left behind is what he chose to leave behind. Videos where he is blatantly describing abortion as murder, telling others that even if a woman is raped or molested she should carry her baby to term since good can come out of evil. Even if the woman is still a child herself. He is also seen telling his debaters that transgender people are suffering from mental illness and that they should be deprogrammed. He even calls their clothing “costumes.” What is really sad is his claim that there is nothing he can do that a Black POC cannot. He publicly mocks the “BLM” movement while falsely stating that “Floydamania” caused this movement and that George Floyd died of a drug OD - which is inherently false. He doesn’t think the Civil Rights Era was a good idea and….. He definitely didn’t deserve to be shot down just because others didn’t agree with his views. In the same breath I also do not think he should be regarded in the same way that we regard Jesus, MLK, Malcom X, etc. |
|
I totally agree that no one has the right to kill another person just because they do not align with their personal and/or political beliefs.
Charlie was a proponent of Free Speech. In fact a few mos before his passing he did a Q & A at Oxford in the U.K. where he stated that we all should have the ability to say outrageous things! However his views are very backward and he states his opinion as facts which can be very misleading. Plus he is against birthright citizenship?!!! |
Completely normal grieving widow solo parenting small children behavior:
|
No he wasn't a proponent of free speech. He was only a proponent of free speech for his side. Not for others. For anyone else who he disagreed with, he and Turning Point USA maintained and published lists such as the "Professor Watchlist" targeting hundreds of academics who were deemed to be "leftist" - Many of the people who ended up on Kirk's list ended up being doxxed, receiving threats and harassment. |
| Charlie is more annoying dead than alive. Fortunately the right seems to be moving on. They didn’t get the story they wanted, the facts are looking a bit too inconvenient, and now it’s all being buried. Time to put the government back to work and release those Epstein files. |
|
You people are sick. This is a woman with 2 very young children who has agreed to carry on the mission of her husband who was murdered in front of the world. And you mock her. It is totally unsurprising that your candidate for VA AG fantasized about murdering his political opponent. It seems to run in the blood of democrats. |
There’s one political party that turned literally everything into a conspiracy starting maybe 15-20 years ago. One party who put this sort of discourse into the mainstream. And now you’re getting mad that people are turning this whole situation into another conspiracy. “Tone down the rhetoric!!!!111” for thee, but not for me. Btw the left/liberals/Democrats mostly don’t GAF about this anymore, most of those accounts Tweeting conspiracies are on the far right. LOL. Like noted extreme woke and progressive Democrat who has never once trafficked in conspiracies, Alex Jones. |
That is Chump every day. |
According to this woman’s own Christian trad wife philosophy, she should be at home, minding her two very young children, not reinventing herself. She and her husband are worth millions of dollars. Why is she fundraising for more? Who is watching her kids when she’s “carrying on the mission of her husband”? |
You haven’t been reading this board if you think the left hasn’t become the king of conspiracy theories. |
Plus she's not that bright and she's developed that laugh to try and distract from revealing it. But every time she opens her mouth, it shows. There's a reason why she wasn't in any of those college tour viral YT shorts and it's not because she's a stay-at-home baby producer. Also, why do they need to have guests for the TPUSA YT channel and the college tours? She's unfit to be the CEO of her kids' lemonade stand. |
I disagree. She is much better educated than he was and could probably run circles around him when it comes to being manipulative and politically astute. |